U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Located in:

e. 6. C. Data Assessment

Review the previous four years Wagner-Peyser data reports on performance. Note whether the State has been meeting its goals to provide MSFWs quantitatively proportionate services as compared to non-MSFWs. If it has not met these goals, explain why the State believes such goals were not met and how the State intends to improve its provision of services in order to meet such goals.

Current Narrative:

The following data regarding Idaho’s performance versus actual attainment of minimum service levels was provided by the department of Labor’s IdahoWorks MIS system and the department’s electronic outreach log records.

Prior to the full implementation of WIOA, the state struggled to achieve Attained status for all three of the MSFW Compliance Indicators. Since then, the state has seen improvement with few measures lacking. However, this may be attributed to several issues, mostly due to the reporting requirements under WIOA. Many of these measures are based on wage-related data. The lag time in reporting wages, which relies on automated reporting from employers, can cause a delay. In addition, because of WIOA’s requirements, an individual that is considered active in any of the partner programs, despite obtaining employment, is not considered as exited from a program and therefore not immediately counted in the measures. As a result of both of these reporting issues, some placements may not be counted if one continues their active status in a program such as Wagner-Peyser (Labor Exchange).

With regards to the MSFW Equity Indicators, IDOL notes that a comparison of these over the years shows that the state is consistently meeting the majority of these numbers. Unfortunately, the overall number of applications has decreased which subsequently affects the indicators.  The pandemic played a significant role in the establishment of these annual universes, as noted with the decrease in the number of non-MSFWs during each PY.

The Idaho Department of Labor also notes that the Compliance Indicators goals were established by USDOL in the 1970’s, and strongly recommends a review of these fixed outcomes. Updating the static measures to something more equitable and reasonable would be more in line with the philosophy behind WIOA to consider current, up-to-date data which reflects economic and labor conditions, as well as the technology applies more relevance to these measures relevant.

Corrective Action - Wagner-Peyser management and outreach staff will assess data collection options to increase documentation of placements on job orders listed with AJCs. Connections with agricultural employers will increase as outreach staff continue to connect with the department’s employer service efforts implemented under WIOA. One-Stop partners have also been encouraged to refer MSFWs to the AJCs to assist them in fully accessing the state’s labor exchange system. Future staff presentations will include an emphasis to ensure that MSFWs receive a full complement of services when present in an AJC or mobile office location, including referrals to WIOA Title I-B as necessary.

PY 2017                                                          MSFW Equity Indicators# of MSFWs% of MSFWs# of Non-MSFWs% of Non-MSFWsEquity
Total Applications89100%13,555100% 
Referred to Employment3640.45%3,27224.14%Yes
Received Staff Assisted Services8797.75%12,56392.68%Yes
Referred to Support Service00.00%00.00%Yes
Career Guidance1820.22%3,50125.83%No
Job Development Contact4955.06%7,89858.27%No
Compliance Indicators# of MSFWs% of MSFWs# of Non-MSFWs% of Non-MSFWsCompliance 
Placed in Job8494.38%11,56985.35%Yes
Placed $.50 above min Wage00.00%20.01%No
Placed in Long Term non-ag Job8494.38%11,56985.35%Yes
      
PY 2018                                                          MSFW Equity Indicators# of MSFWs% of MSFWs# of Non-MSFWs% of Non-MSFWsEquity
Total Applications240100%16,308100% 
Referred to Employment6727.92%2,60715.99%Yes
Received Staff Assisted Services22895.00%15,39994.43%Yes
Referred to Support Service00.00%00.00%Yes
Career Guidance4117.08%3,13919.25%No
Job Development Contact13656.67%9,46158.01%No
Compliance Indicators# of MSFWs% of MSFWs# of Non-MSFWs% of Non-MSFWsCompliance 
Placed in Job14460.00%9,01955.30%Yes
Placed $.50 above min Wage00.00%00.00%Yes
Placed in Long Term non-ag Job14460.00%9,01955.30%Yes
PY 2019                                                      MSFW Equity Indicators# of MSFWs% of MSFWs# of Non-MSFWs% of Non-MSFWsEquity
Total Applications219100%17,006100%Yes
Referred to Employment4922.37%1,91811.28%Yes
Received Staff Assisted Services21598.17%9,91658.31%Yes
Referred to Support Service00.00%00.00%Yes
Career Guidance3315.07%2,37113.94%Yes
Job Development Contact14666.67%10,21060.04%Yes
Compliance Indicators# of MSFWs% of MSFWs# of Non-MSFWs% of Non-MSFWsCompliance 
Placed in Job15075.76%9,04969.50%Yes
Placed $.50 above min WageNANANANANA
Placed in Long Term non-ag Job9886.73%6,94788.54%No
PY 2020                                                   MSFW Equity Indicators# of MSFWs% of MSFWs# of Non-MSFWs% of Non-MSFWsEquity
Total Applications109100%13,173100%Yes
Referred to Employment98.26%7595.76%Yes
Received Staff Assisted Services109100%13,11699.57%Yes
Referred to Support Service00.00%00.00%Yes
Career Guidance1211.01%1,2479.47%Yes
Job Development Contact6862.39%7,73358.70%Yes
Compliance Indicators# of MSFWs% of MSFWs# of Non-MSFWs% of Non-MSFWsCompliance 
Placed in Job13071.04%9,06664.28Yes
Placed $.50 above min WageNANANANANA
Placed in Long Term non-ag Job10785.60%8,32186.77%No