U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

Https

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock () or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

2 Year Modification

Idaho PYs 2022-2023 (Mod) Published Approved

WIOA State Plan Common Elements

Section Published
Previous Plan Year Value Current Revision
Enter Narrative
1 <p>For example, attracting and retaining qualified program staff should lead to higher levels of participation, retention, and outcomes for participants. Expanding services to rural communities may initially decrease certain aspects of program performance, as individuals in these communities have a higher likelihood of facing multiple barriers to employment and education. However, over the long-term, this strategy should improve outcomes as these communities build the capacity to support their residents through continued economic growth.</p> 1 <p>For example, attracting and retaining qualified program staff should lead to higher levels of participation, retention, and outcomes for participants. Expanding services to rural communities may initially decrease certain aspects of program performance, as individuals in these communities have a higher likelihood of facing multiple barriers to employment and education. However, over the long-term, this strategy should improve outcomes as these communities build the capacity to support their residents through continued economic growth.</p>
2 2
3 - <p>For Program Year (PY) 2016-2019 plans, certain primary indicators of performance were designated as “baseline” indicators to ensure an orderly transition from the requirements of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to those under WIOA. As a result, “baseline” indicators were not used to adjust year-end of performance levels nor were they used to determine failure to meet performance levels. The federal agencies designated indicators as “baseline” based on the likelihood of a State having insufficient data with which to make a reasonable determination of an expected level of performance.</p> 3 + <p>For Program Year (PY) 2016-2019 plans, certain primary indicators of performance were designated as “baseline” indicators to ensure an orderly transition from the requirements of the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 to those under WIOA. As a result, “baseline” indicators were not used to adjust year-end of performance levels nor were they used to determine failure to meet performance levels. The federal agencies designated indicators as baseline based on the likelihood of a State having insufficient data with which to make a reasonable determination of an expected level of performance.&nbsp; Due to unforeseen circumstances impacting the natural flow of operations, Title II and IV programs have been extended transitional delay in the imposition of sanctions on PY 2020 and 2021 data when available baselines are not sufficient to produce reliable estimates using the Statistical Adjustment Model (RSA-FAQ-22-01 &amp; RSA-TAC-20-02). The Primary Indicators of Performance for all programs under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act are:</p>
4 4
5 - <p>The Primary Indicators of Performance for all programs under the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act are:</p> 5 + <p>1.&nbsp; Percentage of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment (and/or education or training, for Title I-B Youth) during the second quarter after exit. (<strong>Employment Rate – ER Q2</strong>)</p>
6 6
7 - <p>1. &nbsp; Percentage of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment (and/or education or training, for Title I-B Youth) during the second quarter after exit. (<strong>Employment Rate – ER Q2</strong>)</p> 7 + <p>2.&nbsp; Percentage of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment (and/or education or training, for Title I-B Youth) during the fourth quarter after exit. (<strong>Employment Rate – ER Q4)</strong></p>
8 8
9 - <p>2. &nbsp; Percentage of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment (and/or education or training, for Title I-B Youth) during the fourth quarter after exit. (<strong>Employment Rate – ER Q4)</strong></p> 9 + <p>3.&nbsp; Median earnings of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the second quarter after exit from the program. (<strong>Median Earnings - ME Q2</strong>)</p>
10 10
11 - <p>3. &nbsp; Median earnings of program participants who are in unsubsidized employment during the second quarter after exit from the program. (<strong>Median Earnings - ME Q2</strong>)</p> 11 + <p>4.&nbsp; Percentage of program participants who obtain a recognized postsecondary credential, or a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent during participation in or within 1 year after exit from the program. (<strong>Credential Attainment Rate – CAR</strong>)</p>
12 12
13 - <p>4. &nbsp; Percentage of program participants who obtain a recognized postsecondary credential, or a secondary school diploma or its recognized equivalent during participation in or within 1 year after exit from the program. (<strong>Credential Attainment Rate – CAR</strong>)</p> 13 + <p>5.&nbsp; Percentage of program participants in an education or training program that led to a recognized postsecondary credential or employment and achieved a measurable skill gain, noting progress towards such a credential or employment. (<strong>Measurable Skill Gain – MSG</strong>)</p>
14 -
15 - <p>5.&nbsp;&nbsp; Percentage of program participants in an education or training program that led to a recognized postsecondary credential or employment and achieved a measurable skill gain, noting progress towards such a credential or employment. (<strong>Measurable Skill Gain – MSG</strong>)</p>
16 14
17 <p><u>Title I-B - Youth, Adult, Dislocated Worker</u></p> 15 <p><u>Title I-B - Youth, Adult, Dislocated Worker</u></p>
18 16
19 <p>The performance reports for the previous three program years for each of the youth, adult and dislocated worker programs are included in the three tables that follow.</p> 17 <p>The performance reports for the previous three program years for each of the youth, adult and dislocated worker programs are included in the three tables that follow.</p>
20 -
21 - <p><em>Youth Program -&nbsp;</em>The WIOA Youth program transitioned to 100% out-of-school youth in PY2015, which is a much harder population to serve. As a result, its performance results have dropped from its WIA period of performance. Idaho hopes to recalibrate the baseline for serving youth under WIOA.</p>
22 18
23 <p><strong>Table 25: Previous Assessment Results for WIOA Title I-B Youth</strong></p> 19 <p><strong>Table 25: Previous Assessment Results for WIOA Title I-B Youth</strong></p>
24 <tr> 20 <tr>
25 <th>WIOA Indicator/Measure</th> 21 <th>WIOA Indicator/Measure</th>
26 - <th>PY16 Negotiated</th>
27 - <th>PY16 Actual</th>
28 - <th>PY17 Negotiated</th>
29 - <th>PY17 Actual</th>
30 <th>PY18 Negotiated</th> 22 <th>PY18 Negotiated</th>
31 - <th>PY18&nbsp; Actual</th> 23 + <th>PY18 Actual</th>
24 + <th>PY19 Negotiated</th>
25 + <th>PY19 Actual</th>
26 + <th>PY20 Negotiated</th>
27 + <th>PY20&nbsp; Actual</th>
32 </tr> 28 </tr>
33 </thead> 29 </thead>
34 <tbody> 30 <tbody>
35 <tr> 31 <tr>
36 - <td>ER Q2</td> 32 + <td><strong>ER Q2</strong></td>
37 - <td>73.10%</td>
38 - <td>NA</td>
39 - <td>75.10%</td>
40 - <td>74.90%</td>
41 <td>69.50%</td> 33 <td>69.50%</td>
42 <td>80.34%</td> 34 <td>80.34%</td>
35 + <td>70.50%</td>
36 + <td>80.34%</td>
37 + <td>76.50%</td>
38 + <td>72.20%</td>
43 </tr> 39 </tr>
44 <tr> 40 <tr>
45 - <td>ER Q4</td> 41 + <td><strong>ER Q4</strong></td>
46 - <td>73.10%</td>
47 - <td>NA</td>
48 - <td>75.10%</td>
49 - <td>77.1%0</td>
50 <td>50.00%</td> 42 <td>50.00%</td>
51 <td>79.75%</td> 43 <td>79.75%</td>
44 + <td>52.00%</td>
45 + <td>79.75%</td>
46 + <td>78%</td>
47 + <td>77.60%</td>
52 </tr> 48 </tr>
53 <tr> 49 <tr>
54 - <td>ME Q2</td> 50 + <td><strong>ME Q2</strong></td>
55 <td>Baseline</td> 51 <td>Baseline</td>
56 - <td>NA</td> 52 + <td>$3,912</td>
57 - <td>Baseline</td>
58 - <td>NA</td>
59 <td>Baseline</td> 53 <td>Baseline</td>
60 <td>$3,912</td> 54 <td>$3,912</td>
55 + <td>$3,991</td>
56 + <td>$4,274</td>
61 </tr> 57 </tr>
62 <tr> 58 <tr>
63 - <td>CAR</td> 59 + <td><strong>CAR</strong></td>
64 - <td>72.20%</td>
65 - <td>NA-</td>
66 - <td>72.20%</td>
67 - <td>43.00%</td>
68 <td>52.00%</td> 60 <td>52.00%</td>
69 <td>51.04%</td> 61 <td>51.04%</td>
62 + <td>55.00%</td>
63 + <td>51.04%</td>
64 + <td>58%</td>
65 + <td>46.90%</td>
70 </tr> 66 </tr>
71 <tr> 67 <tr>
72 - <td>MSG</td> 68 + <td><strong>MSG</strong></td>
73 <td>Baseline</td> 69 <td>Baseline</td>
74 - <td>NA</td> 70 + <td>40.22%</td>
75 - <td>Baseline</td>
76 - <td>46.40%</td>
77 <td>Baseline</td> 71 <td>Baseline</td>
78 <td>40.22%</td> 72 <td>40.22%</td>
73 + <td>50%</td>
74 + <td>49.60%</td>
79 </tr> 75 </tr>
80 </tbody> 76 </tbody>
81 <tr> 77 <tr>
82 <th>WIOA Indicator/Measure</th> 78 <th>WIOA Indicator/Measure</th>
83 - <th>PY16 Negotiated</th>
84 - <th>PY16 Actual</th>
85 - <th>PY17 Negotiated</th>
86 - <th>PY17 Actual</th>
87 <th>PY18 Negotiated</th> 79 <th>PY18 Negotiated</th>
88 <th>PY18 Actual</th> 80 <th>PY18 Actual</th>
81 + <th>PY19 Negotiated</th>
82 + <th>PY19 Actual</th>
83 + <th>PY20 Negotiated</th>
84 + <th>PY20&nbsp; Actual</th>
89 </tr> 85 </tr>
90 </thead> 86 </thead>
91 <tbody> 87 <tbody>
92 <tr> 88 <tr>
93 - <td>ER Q2</td> 89 + <td><strong>ER Q2</strong></td>
94 - <td>81.50%</td>
95 - <td>NA</td>
96 - <td>83.50%</td>
97 - <td>80.80%</td>
98 <td>77.00%</td> 90 <td>77.00%</td>
99 <td>85.75%</td> 91 <td>85.75%</td>
92 + <td>78.00%</td>
93 + <td>85.30%</td>
94 + <td>81.50%</td>
95 + <td>73.60%</td>
100 </tr> 96 </tr>
101 <tr> 97 <tr>
102 - <td>ER Q4</td> 98 + <td><strong>ER Q4</strong></td>
103 - <td>68.30%</td>
104 - <td>NA</td>
105 - <td>70.30%</td>
106 - <td>82.90%</td>
107 <td>46.00%</td> 99 <td>46.00%</td>
108 <td>80.98%</td> 100 <td>80.98%</td>
101 + <td>49.00%</td>
102 + <td>85.60%</td>
103 + <td>82.00%</td>
104 + <td>76.90%</td>
109 </tr> 105 </tr>
110 <tr> 106 <tr>
111 - <td>ME Q2</td> 107 + <td><strong>ME Q2</strong></td>
112 - <td>$5,225</td>
113 - <td>NA</td>
114 - <td>$5,425</td>
115 - <td>NA</td>
116 <td>$6,000</td> 108 <td>$6,000</td>
117 <td>$7,202</td> 109 <td>$7,202</td>
110 + <td>$6,100</td>
111 + <td>$6,593</td>
112 + <td>$6,900</td>
113 + <td>$6,716</td>
118 </tr> 114 </tr>
119 <tr> 115 <tr>
120 - <td>CAR</td> 116 + <td><strong>CAR</strong></td>
121 - <td>68.90%</td>
122 - <td>NA</td>
123 - <td>70.90%</td>
124 - <td>40.30%</td>
125 <td>50.00%</td> 117 <td>50.00%</td>
126 <td>63.67%</td> 118 <td>63.67%</td>
119 + <td>53.00%</td>
120 + <td>74.70%</td>
121 + <td>70.00%</td>
122 + <td>73.30%</td>
127 </tr> 123 </tr>
128 <tr> 124 <tr>
129 - <td>MSG</td> 125 + <td><strong>MSG</strong></td>
130 <td>Baseline</td> 126 <td>Baseline</td>
131 - <td>NA</td> 127 + <td>47.23%</td>
132 <td>Baseline</td> 128 <td>Baseline</td>
133 - <td>40.90%</td> 129 + <td>30.50%</td>
134 - <td>Baseline</td> 130 + <td>50.00%</td>
135 - <td>47.23%</td> 131 + <td>64.30%</td>
136 </tr> 132 </tr>
137 </tbody> 133 </tbody>
138 <tr> 134 <tr>
139 <th>WIOA Indicator/ Measure</th> 135 <th>WIOA Indicator/ Measure</th>
140 - <th>PY16 Negotiated</th>
141 - <th>PY16 Actual</th>
142 - <th>PY17 Negotiated</th>
143 - <th>PY17 Actual</th>
144 <th>PY18 Negotiated</th> 136 <th>PY18 Negotiated</th>
145 <th>PY18 Actual</th> 137 <th>PY18 Actual</th>
138 + <th>PY19 Negotiated</th>
139 + <th>PY19 Actual</th>
140 + <th>PY20 Negotiated</th>
141 + <th>PY20&nbsp; Actual</th>
146 </tr> 142 </tr>
147 </thead> 143 </thead>
148 <tbody> 144 <tbody>
149 <tr> 145 <tr>
150 - <td>ER Q2</td> 146 + <td><strong>ER Q2</strong></td>
151 - <td>81.80%</td>
152 - <td>NA</td>
153 - <td>83.80%</td>
154 - <td>82.40%</td>
155 <td>85.90%</td> 147 <td>85.90%</td>
156 <td>83.46%</td> 148 <td>83.46%</td>
149 + <td>86.90%</td>
150 + <td>81.90%</td>
151 + <td>80.30%</td>
152 + <td>81.20%</td>
157 </tr> 153 </tr>
158 <tr> 154 <tr>
159 - <td>ER Q4</td> 155 + <td><strong>ER Q4</strong></td>
160 - <td>71.90%</td>
161 - <td>NA</td>
162 - <td>73.90%</td>
163 - <td>83.30%</td>
164 <td>49.00%</td> 156 <td>49.00%</td>
165 <td>83.47%</td> 157 <td>83.47%</td>
158 + <td>53.00%</td>
159 + <td>83.90%</td>
160 + <td>81.00%</td>
161 + <td>76.20%</td>
166 </tr> 162 </tr>
167 <tr> 163 <tr>
168 - <td>ME Q2</td> 164 + <td><strong>ME Q2</strong></td>
169 - <td>$6,433</td>
170 - <td>NA</td>
171 - <td>$6,633</td>
172 - <td>NA</td>
173 <td>$7,241</td> 165 <td>$7,241</td>
174 <td>$8,016</td> 166 <td>$8,016</td>
167 + <td>$7,400</td>
168 + <td>$7,923</td>
169 + <td>$8,016</td>
170 + <td>$7,876</td>
175 </tr> 171 </tr>
176 <tr> 172 <tr>
177 - <td>CAR</td> 173 + <td><strong>CAR</strong></td>
178 - <td>68.00%</td>
179 - <td>NA</td>
180 - <td>70.00%</td>
181 - <td>51.10%</td>
182 <td>45.00%</td> 174 <td>45.00%</td>
183 <td>69.08%</td> 175 <td>69.08%</td>
176 + <td>50.00%</td>
177 + <td>77.20%</td>
178 + <td>65.50%</td>
179 + <td>73.80%</td>
184 </tr> 180 </tr>
185 <tr> 181 <tr>
186 - <td>MSG</td> 182 + <td><strong>MSG</strong></td>
187 <td>Baseline</td> 183 <td>Baseline</td>
188 - <td>NA</td> 184 + <td>46.29%</td>
189 <td>Baseline</td> 185 <td>Baseline</td>
190 - <td>44.10%</td> 186 + <td>22.80%</td>
191 - <td>Baseline</td> 187 + <td>50.00%</td>
192 - <td>46.29%</td> 188 + <td>61.20%</td>
193 </tr> 189 </tr>
194 </tbody> 190 </tbody>
195 </table> 191 </table>
196 192
197 - <h5><strong>Title II - Adult Education and Family Literacy</strong></h5> 193 + <p><strong>Title II - Adult Education and Family Literacy</strong></p>
198 194
199 - <p>The Agency administering Title II Program (Idaho Career &amp;Technical Education) is required to negotiate performance targets with the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education at the US Department of Education each year. The table below shows the target and actual performance for Program Year PY16 (July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017), PY17 and PY18.</p> 195 + <p>The Agency administering Title II Program (Idaho Career &amp;Technical Education) is required to negotiate performance targets with the Office of Career, Technical, and Adult Education at the US Department of Education each year. The table below shows the target and actual performance for Program Year PY19 (July 1, 2019 - June 30, 2020) and PY20.</p>
200 196
201 <p><strong>Table 28: Previous Assessment Results for Title II, Adult Education Programs </strong></p> 197 <p><strong>Table 28: Previous Assessment Results for Title II, Adult Education Programs </strong></p>
202 <tr> 198 <tr>
203 <th>Educational Functioning Level</th> 199 <th>Educational Functioning Level</th>
204 - <th>PY16 Target</th> 200 + <th>PY20 Target</th>
205 - <th>PY16 Actual</th> 201 + <th>PY20 Actual</th>
206 - <th>PY17 Target</th>
207 - <th>PY17 Actual</th>
208 - <th>PY18 Target</th>
209 - <th>PY18 Actual</th>
210 </tr> 202 </tr>
211 </thead> 203 </thead>
212 <tbody> 204 <tbody>
213 <tr> 205 <tr>
214 - <td> 206 + <td>ABE Level 1</td>
215 - <p><strong>ABE Level 1</strong></p> 207 + <td>40%</td>
216 - </td> 208 + <td>26%</td>
217 - <td>
218 - <p>51%</p>
219 - </td>
220 - <td>
221 - <p>36%</p>
222 - </td>
223 - <td>
224 - <p>36%</p>
225 - </td>
226 - <td>
227 - <p>44%</p>
228 - </td>
229 - <td>
230 - <p>41%</p>
231 - </td>
232 - <td>
233 - <p>36%</p>
234 - </td>
235 </tr> 209 </tr>
236 <tr> 210 <tr>
237 - <td> 211 + <td>ABE Level 2</td>
238 - <p><strong>ABE Level 2</strong></p> 212 + <td>40%</td>
239 - </td> 213 + <td>28%</td>
240 - <td>
241 - <p>50%</p>
242 - </td>
243 - <td>
244 - <p>39%</p>
245 - </td>
246 - <td>
247 - <p>39%</p>
248 - </td>
249 - <td>
250 - <p>46%</p>
251 - </td>
252 - <td>
253 - <p>44%</p>
254 - </td>
255 - <td>
256 - <p>38%</p>
257 - </td>
258 </tr> 214 </tr>
259 <tr> 215 <tr>
260 - <td> 216 + <td>ABE Level 3</td>
261 - <p><strong>ABE Level 3</strong></p> 217 + <td>43%</td>
262 - </td> 218 + <td>30%</td>
263 - <td>
264 - <p>44%</p>
265 - </td>
266 - <td>
267 - <p>39%</p>
268 - </td>
269 - <td>
270 - <p>39%</p>
271 - </td>
272 - <td>
273 - <p>41%</p>
274 - </td>
275 - <td>
276 - <p>44%</p>
277 - </td>
278 - <td>
279 - <p>38%</p>
280 - </td>
281 </tr> 219 </tr>
282 <tr> 220 <tr>
283 - <td> 221 + <td>ABE Level 4</td>
284 - <p><strong>ABE Level 4</strong></p> 222 + <td>43%</td>
285 - </td> 223 + <td>32%</td>
286 - <td>
287 - <p>40%</p>
288 - </td>
289 - <td>
290 - <p>39%</p>
291 - </td>
292 - <td>
293 - <p>39%</p>
294 - </td>
295 - <td>
296 - <p>43%</p>
297 - </td>
298 - <td>
299 - <p>45%</p>
300 - </td>
301 - <td>
302 - <p>42%</p>
303 - </td>
304 </tr> 224 </tr>
305 <tr> 225 <tr>
306 - <td> 226 + <td>ABE Level 5</td>
307 - <p><strong>ABE Level 5</strong></p> 227 + <td>45%</td>
308 - </td> 228 + <td>26%</td>
309 - <td>
310 - <p>33%</p>
311 - </td>
312 - <td>
313 - <p>44%</p>
314 - </td>
315 - <td>
316 - <p>44%</p>
317 - </td>
318 - <td>
319 - <p>46%</p>
320 - </td>
321 - <td>
322 - <p>49%</p>
323 - </td>
324 - <td>
325 - <p>44%</p>
326 - </td>
327 </tr> 229 </tr>
328 <tr> 230 <tr>
329 - <td> 231 + <td>ABE Level 6</td>
330 - <p><strong>ABE Level 6</strong></p> 232 + <td>15%</td>
331 - </td> 233 + <td>40%</td>
332 - <td>
333 - <p>NA</p>
334 - </td>
335 - <td>
336 - <p>15%</p>
337 - </td>
338 - <td>
339 - <p>15%</p>
340 - </td>
341 - <td>
342 - <p>19%</p>
343 - </td>
344 - <td>
345 - <p>20%</p>
346 - </td>
347 - <td>
348 - <p>15%</p>
349 - </td>
350 </tr> 234 </tr>
351 <tr> 235 <tr>
352 - <td> 236 + <td>ESL Level 1</td>
353 - <p><strong>ESL Level 1</strong></p> 237 + <td>44%</td>
354 - </td> 238 + <td>15%</td>
355 - <td>
356 - <p>48%</p>
357 - </td>
358 - <td>
359 - <p>40%</p>
360 - </td>
361 - <td>
362 - <p>40%</p>
363 - </td>
364 - <td>
365 - <p>43%</p>
366 - </td>
367 - <td>
368 - <p>45%</p>
369 - </td>
370 - <td>
371 - <p>39%</p>
372 - </td>
373 </tr> 239 </tr>
374 <tr> 240 <tr>
375 - <td> 241 + <td>ESL Level 2</td>
376 - <p><strong>ESL Level 2</strong></p> 242 + <td>44%</td>
377 - </td> 243 + <td>22%</td>
378 - <td>
379 - <p>55%</p>
380 - </td>
381 - <td>
382 - <p>47%</p>
383 - </td>
384 - <td>
385 - <p>47%</p>
386 - </td>
387 - <td>
388 - <p>42%</p>
389 - </td>
390 - <td>
391 - <p>53%</p>
392 - </td>
393 - <td>
394 - <p>46%</p>
395 - </td>
396 </tr> 244 </tr>
397 <tr> 245 <tr>
398 - <td> 246 + <td>ESL Level 3</td>
399 - <p><strong>ESL Level 3</strong></p> 247 + <td>41%</td>
400 - </td> 248 + <td>19%</td>
401 - <td>
402 - <p>55%</p>
403 - </td>
404 - <td>
405 - <p>45%</p>
406 - </td>
407 - <td>
408 - <p>45%</p>
409 - </td>
410 - <td>
411 - <p>34%</p>
412 - </td>
413 - <td>
414 - <p>51%</p>
415 - </td>
416 - <td>
417 - <p>33%</p>
418 - </td>
419 </tr> 249 </tr>
420 <tr> 250 <tr>
421 - <td> 251 + <td>ESL Level 4</td>
422 - <p><strong>ESL Level 4</strong></p> 252 + <td>40%</td>
423 - </td> 253 + <td>13%</td>
424 - <td>
425 - <p>45%</p>
426 - </td>
427 - <td>
428 - <p>37%</p>
429 - </td>
430 - <td>
431 - <p>37%</p>
432 - </td>
433 - <td>
434 - <p>27%</p>
435 - </td>
436 - <td>
437 - <p>42%</p>
438 - </td>
439 - <td>
440 - <p>25%</p>
441 - </td>
442 </tr> 254 </tr>
443 <tr> 255 <tr>
444 - <td> 256 + <td>ESL Level 5</td>
445 - <p><strong>ESL Level 5</strong></p> 257 + <td>30%</td>
446 - </td> 258 + <td>17%</td>
447 - <td>
448 - <p>34%</p>
449 - </td>
450 - <td>
451 - <p>34%</p>
452 - </td>
453 - <td>
454 - <p>34%</p>
455 - </td>
456 - <td>
457 - <p>32%</p>
458 - </td>
459 - <td>
460 - <p>39%</p>
461 - </td>
462 - <td>
463 - <p>25%</p>
464 - </td>
465 </tr> 259 </tr>
466 <tr> 260 <tr>
467 - <td> 261 + <td>ESL Level 6</td>
468 - <p><strong>ESL Level 6</strong></p> 262 + <td>20%</td>
469 - </td> 263 + <td>8%</td>
470 - <td>
471 - <p>20%</p>
472 - </td>
473 - <td>
474 - <p>17%</p>
475 - </td>
476 - <td>
477 - <p>17%</p>
478 - </td>
479 - <td>
480 - <p>13%</p>
481 - </td>
482 - <td>
483 - <p>20%</p>
484 - </td>
485 - <td>
486 - <p>20%</p>
487 - </td>
488 </tr> 264 </tr>
489 </tbody> 265 </tbody>
490 <p><em>Measurable Skill Gain Assessment</em></p> 266 <p><em>Measurable Skill Gain Assessment</em></p>
491 267
492 - <p>The overall skill gain rate for Idaho’s CTE programs was 36% for PY18, compared to 38.59% in PY17. Despite not meeting the PY18 Educational Functioning Level (EFL) performance goals, Idaho’s Adult Education programs have identified trends and performance improvement solutions to address the MSG rate. The overall rate for measurable skill gain varied from 32% to 45% among local programs in PY18.</p> 268 + <p>The overall skill gain rate for Idaho’s CTE programs was 27% for PY20, compared to 36% in PY18. Despite not meeting the PY20 Educational Functioning Level (EFL) performance goals, Idaho’s Adult Education programs have identified trends and performance improvement solutions to address the MSG rate. The overall rate for measurable skill gain varied from 25% to 45% among local programs in PY20.</p>
493 269
494 - <p>Three related trends emerged in the PY18 Annual Reports which may help identify some causes of low MSG performance:</p> 270 + <p>Three related trends emerged in the PY20 Annual Reports which may help identify some causes of low MSG performance:</p>
495 271
496 <ul> 272 <ul>
497 - <li>The continued low unemployment rate in Idaho continues to be a challenge for retaining adult education students. Idaho just marked two years of an unemployment rate below three percent. Additionally, Adult Education students are balancing classes, childcare, personal, and professional responsibilities. The opportunity cost of attending classes is particularly challenging for many adult education students, as students have significant financial burdens of providing for their families’ immediate needs.&nbsp;</li> 273 + <li>The continued low unemployment rate in Idaho continues to be a challenge for retaining adult education students. Additionally, Adult Education students are balancing classes, childcare, personal, and professional responsibilities. The opportunity cost of attending classes is particularly challenging for many adult education students, as students have significant financial burdens of providing for their families’ immediate needs. In addition, region’s employers are accepting applicants with less than a high school diploma or GED, and this contributed to lower outcomes.&nbsp;</li>
498 - <li>The challenge of adapting to a new assessment was a significant factor for many of the program sites. Program sites are continuing to refine curriculum to better align with the TABE assessment.</li> 274 + <li>The limitations of our current statewide database (Idaho Management &amp; Accountability System) has meant program sites are unable to investigate their data in a meaningful way to determine underlying reasons behind the MSG drop. It is challenging for sites to be able to make data-informed programming decisions and changes due to the database’s limitations and low data quality. However, this has been reconciled with securing a new Management Information System called LACES.&nbsp; We anticipate data will be more accurate and reliable moving forward.&nbsp;</li>
499 - <li>The limitations of our current statewide database (Idaho Management &amp; Accountability System) has meant program sites are unable to investigate their data in a meaningful way to determine underlying reasons behind the MSG drop. It is challenging for sites to be able to make data-informed programming decisions and changes due to the database’s limitations and low data quality.</li> 275 + <li>Due to COVID, several outreach sites were closed of which a few are beginning to reopen.&nbsp; This situation in conjunction with a large reduction in attendance led to low MSG outcomes.&nbsp; In addition, program sites are continuing to refine curriculum to better align with the TABE assessment and the new CASAS Math Goals.</li>
500 </ul> 276 </ul>
501 -
502 - <p>For those programs whose performance was unusually low (compared to prior years), the State required a Program Improvement Plan, which was implemented in the winter 2016-2017.</p>
503 -
504 - <p><em>Post-Exit Outcomes</em></p>
505 -
506 - <p>The post exit targets were<em>&nbsp;not included in&nbsp;</em>Idaho’s PY17 and PY18 reporting requirements, as the data submitted will be used as a baseline for future negotiations. Title II actual performance for PY17 and PY18 post-exit outcomes are described in the following table.</p>
507 277
508 <p><strong>Table 29: Previous Post-Exit Outcomes for WIOA Title II Adult Education</strong></p> 278 <p><strong>Table 29: Previous Post-Exit Outcomes for WIOA Title II Adult Education</strong></p>
509 <thead> 279 <thead>
510 <tr> 280 <tr>
511 - <td> 281 + <td><strong>WIOA Indicator/Measure</strong></td>
512 - <p><strong>WIOA Indicator/Measure</strong></p> 282 + <td><strong>PY19 Negotiated</strong></td>
513 - </td> 283 + <td><strong>PY19 Actual</strong></td>
514 - <td> 284 + <td><strong>PY20 Negotiated</strong></td>
515 - <p><strong>PY17 Negotiated</strong></p> 285 + <td><strong>PY20 Actual</strong></td>
516 - </td>
517 - <td>
518 - <p><strong>PY17 Actual</strong></p>
519 - </td>
520 - <td>
521 - <p><strong>PY18 Negotiated</strong></p>
522 - </td>
523 - <td>
524 - <p><strong>PY18 Actual</strong></p>
525 - </td>
526 </tr> 286 </tr>
527 </thead> 287 </thead>
528 <tbody> 288 <tbody>
529 <tr> 289 <tr>
530 - <td> 290 + <td><strong>ER Q2</strong></td>
531 - <p>ER Q2</p> 291 + <td>Baseline</td>
532 - </td> 292 + <td>19.39%</td>
533 - <td> 293 + <td>55%</td>
534 - <p>NA</p> 294 + <td>4%</td>
535 - </td>
536 - <td>
537 - <p>55.69%</p>
538 - </td>
539 - <td>
540 - <p>NA</p>
541 - </td>
542 - <td>
543 - <p>60%</p>
544 - </td>
545 </tr> 295 </tr>
546 <tr> 296 <tr>
547 - <td> 297 + <td><strong>ER Q4</strong></td>
548 - <p>ER Q4</p> 298 + <td>Baseline</td>
549 - </td> 299 + <td>39.14%</td>
550 - <td> 300 + <td>40%</td>
551 - <p>NA</p> 301 + <td>21%</td>
552 - </td>
553 - <td>
554 - <p>57.43%</p>
555 - </td>
556 - <td>
557 - <p>NA</p>
558 - </td>
559 - <td>
560 - <p>39%</p>
561 - </td>
562 </tr> 302 </tr>
563 <tr> 303 <tr>
564 - <td> 304 + <td><strong>ME Q2</strong></td>
565 - <p>ME Q2</p> 305 + <td>Baseline</td>
566 - </td> 306 + <td>$4,570</td>
567 - <td> 307 + <td>$4500</td>
568 - <p>NA</p> 308 + <td>$3900</td>
569 - </td>
570 - <td>
571 - <p>$4,219</p>
572 - </td>
573 - <td>
574 - <p>NA</p>
575 - </td>
576 - <td>
577 - <p>$4,656</p>
578 - </td>
579 </tr> 309 </tr>
580 <tr> 310 <tr>
581 - <td> 311 + <td><strong>CAR</strong></td>
582 - <p>CAR</p> 312 + <td>Baseline</td>
583 - </td> 313 + <td>28.7%</td>
584 - <td> 314 + <td>35%</td>
585 - <p>NA</p> 315 + <td>100%</td>
586 - </td>
587 - <td>
588 - <p>37%</p>
589 - </td>
590 - <td>
591 - <p>NA</p>
592 - </td>
593 - <td>
594 - <p>.22%</p>
595 - </td>
596 </tr> 316 </tr>
597 <tr> 317 <tr>
598 - <td> 318 + <td><strong>MSG</strong></td>
599 - <p>MSG</p> 319 + <td>40.0%</td>
600 - </td> 320 + <td>27.0%</td>
601 - <td> 321 + <td>40%</td>
602 - <p>45%</p> 322 + <td>27%</td>
603 - </td>
604 - <td>
605 - <p>38.59%</p>
606 - </td>
607 - <td>
608 - <p>44%</p>
609 - </td>
610 - <td>
611 - <p>35.44%</p>
612 - </td>
613 </tr> 323 </tr>
614 </tbody> 324 </tbody>
615 </table> 325 </table>
616 326
617 - <p><u>Title III - Wagner-Peyser</u></p> 327 + <p><strong><u>Title III - Wagner-Peyser</u></strong></p>
618 328
619 - <p>The performance reports for the previous program years for the Wagner-Peyser program are included below. Under the Workforce Investment Act, Title III programs are considered to have met the performance goals if the actual results are within 80% of the negotiated goal. Idaho’s performance results indicate a very high quality Wagner-Peyser program. Wagner-Peyser is currently not required to include CAR and MSG as active program measures.</p> 329 + <p>The performance reports for the previous program years for the Wagner-Peyser program are included below. Under the Workforce Investment Act, Title III programs are considered to have met the performance goals if the actual results are within 80% of the negotiated goal. Idaho’s performance results indicate a very high-quality Wagner-Peyser program. Wagner-Peyser is currently not required to include CAR and MSG as active program measures.</p>
620 330
621 <p><strong>Table 30: Previous Assessment Results for WIOA Title III, Wagner Peyser Program</strong></p> 331 <p><strong>Table 30: Previous Assessment Results for WIOA Title III, Wagner Peyser Program</strong></p>
622 <thead> 332 <thead>
623 <tr> 333 <tr>
624 - <td> 334 + <td><strong>WIOA Indicator/Measure</strong></td>
625 - <p><strong>WIOA Indicator/Measure</strong></p> 335 + <td><strong>PY18 Negotiated</strong></td>
626 - </td> 336 + <td><strong>PY18 Actual</strong></td>
627 - <td> 337 + <td><strong>PY19 Negotiated</strong></td>
628 - <p><strong>PY16 Negotiated</strong></p> 338 + <td><strong>PY19 Actual</strong></td>
629 - </td> 339 + <td><strong>PY20 Negotiated</strong></td>
630 - <td> 340 + <td><strong>PY20&amp;nbsp; Actual</strong></td>
631 - <p><strong>PY16 Actual</strong></p>
632 - </td>
633 - <td>
634 - <p><strong>PY17 Negotiated</strong></p>
635 - </td>
636 - <td>
637 - <p><strong>PY17 Actual</strong></p>
638 - </td>
639 - <td>
640 - <p><strong>PY18 Negotiated</strong></p>
641 - </td>
642 - <td>
643 - <p>&lt;strong&gt;PY18 Actual</strong></p>
644 - </td>
645 </tr> 341 </tr>
646 </thead> 342 </thead>
647 <tbody> 343 <tbody>
648 <tr> 344 <tr>
649 - <td> 345 + <td><strong>ER Q2</strong></td>
650 - <p>ER Q2</p> 346 + <td>65.6%</td>
651 - </td> 347 + <td>72.90%</td>
652 - <td> 348 + <td>66.6%</td>
653 - <p>58.1%</p> 349 + <td>69.6%</td>
654 - </td> 350 + <td>70.1%</td>
655 - <td> 351 + <td>64.4%</td>
656 - <p>NA</p>
657 - </td>
658 - <td>
659 - <p>60.1%</p>
660 - </td>
661 - <td>
662 - <p>73.10%</p>
663 - </td>
664 - <td>
665 - <p>65.60%</p>
666 - </td>
667 - <td>
668 - <p>72.90%</p>
669 - </td>
670 </tr> 352 </tr>
671 <tr> 353 <tr>
672 - <td> 354 + <td><strong>ER Q4</strong></td>
673 - <p>ER Q4</p> 355 + <td>49.0%</td>
674 - </td> 356 + <td>72.90%</td>
675 - <td> 357 + <td>51.0%</td>
676 - <p>67.6%</p> 358 + <td>70.2%</td>
677 - </td> 359 + <td>70.0%</td>
678 - <td> 360 + <td>65.3%</td>
679 - <p>NA</p>
680 - </td>
681 - <td>
682 - <p>69.6%</p>
683 - </td>
684 - <td>
685 - <p>73.40%</p>
686 - </td>
687 - <td>
688 - <p>49.00%</p>
689 - </td>
690 - <td>
691 - <p>72.90%</p>
692 - </td>
693 </tr> 361 </tr>
694 <tr> 362 <tr>
695 - <td> 363 + <td><strong>ME Q2</strong></td>
696 - <p>ME Q2</p> 364 + <td>$4,859</td>
697 - </td> 365 + <td>$5,743</td>
698 - <td> 366 + <td>$5,110</td>
699 - <p>$4,545</p> 367 + <td>$5,912</td>
700 - </td> 368 + <td>$5,800</td>
701 - <td> 369 + <td>$6,135</td>
702 - <p>NA</p>
703 - </td>
704 - <td>
705 - <p>$4,745</p>
706 - </td>
707 - <td>
708 - <p>$5,592</p>
709 - </td>
710 - <td>
711 - <p>$4,859</p>
712 - </td>
713 - <td>
714 - <p>$5,743</p>
715 - </td>
716 </tr> 370 </tr>
717 </tbody> 371 </tbody>
718 </table> 372 </table>
719 373
720 - <p><u>Title IV - Vocational Rehabilitation</u></p> 374 + <p><strong><u>Title IV - Vocational Rehabilitation</u></strong></p>
721 375
722 - <p>Title IV Vocational Rehabilitation programs are using a phased-in approach to set levels of performance for all primary performance indicators under this Combined State Plan. RSA-TAC-18-01 released January 18, 2018 provided guidance on the requirements for these indicators for PYs 2018 and 2019, noting that the same required levels of performance for PYs 2016 and 2017 be used. The level of performance for PYs 2016 and 2017 were baseline therefore baseline levels of performance will continue to be collected for PYs 2018 and 2019 to be used in establishing initial levels of performance for future negotiation. As a result, not all results are being reported for the Primary Indicators of Performance listed: Data on Measurable Skill Gains are now coming online, and this preliminary baseline is reported in table 31 below Title IV programs anticipate negotiation of the MSG target for the first time next year, with other 116 primary performance indicators coming online before the next state plan.&nbsp; Title IV programs have provided emerging results for ER Q2 and ME Q2.&nbsp;</p> 376 + <p>Title IV Vocational Rehabilitation programs are using a phased-in approach to set levels of performance for all primary performance indicators under this Combined State Plan. RSA-TAC-18-01 released January 18, 2018 provided guidance on the requirements for these indicators for PYs 2018 and 2019, noting that the same required levels of performance for PYs 2016 and 2017 be used. The level of performance for PYs 2016 and 2017 were baseline therefore baseline levels of performance will continue to be collected for PYs 2018 and 2019 to be used in establishing initial levels of performance for future negotiation. Later, PY20 was also included in this practice. As a result, not all results are being reported for the Primary Indicators of Performance listed: Data on Measurable Skill Gains are now coming online, and this preliminary baseline is reported in table 31 below. Title IV programs anticipate negotiation of the MSG target for the first time next year, with other 116 primary performance indicators coming online before the next state plan. Title IV programs have provided emerging results for ER Q2 and ME Q2.</p>
723 377
724 <p><strong>Table 31: Previous Assessment Results for WIOA Title IV VR Programs</strong></p> 378 <p><strong>Table 31: Previous Assessment Results for WIOA Title IV VR Programs</strong></p>
725 <thead> 379 <thead>
726 <tr> 380 <tr>
727 - <td> 381 + <td><strong>WIOA Indicator/Measure</strong></td>
728 - <p><strong>WIOA Indicator/Measure</strong></p> 382 + <td><strong>PY18 Negotiated</strong></td>
729 - </td> 383 + <td><strong>PY18 Actual</strong></td>
730 - <td> 384 + <td><strong>PY19 Negotiated</strong></td>
731 - <p><strong>PY16 Negotiated</strong></p> 385 + <td><strong>PY19 Actual</strong></td>
732 - </td> 386 + <td><strong>PY20 Negotiated</strong></td>
733 - <td> 387 + <td><strong>PY20&amp;nbsp; Actual</strong></td>
734 - <p><strong>PY16 Actual</strong></p>
735 - </td>
736 - <td>
737 - <p><strong>PY17 Negotiated</strong></p>
738 - </td>
739 - <td>
740 - <p><strong>PY17 Actual</strong></p>
741 - </td>
742 - <td>
743 - <p><strong>PY18 Negotiated</strong></p>
744 - </td>
745 - <td>
746 - <p>&lt;strong&gt;PY18 Actual</strong></p>
747 - </td>
748 </tr> 388 </tr>
749 </thead> 389 </thead>
750 <tbody> 390 <tbody>
751 <tr> 391 <tr>
752 - <td> 392 + <td><strong>ER Q2</strong></td>
753 - <p>ER Q2</p> 393 + <td>Baseline</td>
754 - </td> 394 + <td>53.6%</td>
755 - <td> 395 + <td>Baseline</td>
756 - <p>NA</p> 396 + <td>59.3%</td>
757 - </td> 397 + <td>Baseline</td>
758 - <td> 398 + <td>58.9%</td>
759 - <p>NA</p>
760 - </td>
761 - <td>
762 - <p>NA</p>
763 - </td>
764 - <td>
765 - <p>NA</p>
766 - </td>
767 - <td>
768 - <p>NA</p>
769 - </td>
770 - <td>
771 - <p>53.6%</p>
772 - </td>
773 </tr> 399 </tr>
774 <tr> 400 <tr>
775 - <td> 401 + <td><strong>ER Q4</strong></td>
776 - <p>ER Q4</p> 402 + <td>Baseline</td>
777 - </td> 403 + <td>NA</td>
778 - <td> 404 + <td>Baseline</td>
779 - <p>NA</p> 405 + <td>54.6%</td>
780 - </td> 406 + <td>Baseline</td>
781 - <td> 407 + <td>57.3%</td>
782 - <p>NA</p>
783 - </td>
784 - <td>
785 - <p>NA</p>
786 - </td>
787 - <td>
788 - <p>NA</p>
789 - </td>
790 - <td>
791 - <p>NA</p>
792 - </td>
793 - <td>
794 - <p>NA</p>
795 - </td>
796 </tr> 408 </tr>
797 <tr> 409 <tr>
798 - <td> 410 + <td><strong>ME Q2</strong></td>
799 - <p>ME Q2</p> 411 + <td>Baseline</td>
800 - </td> 412 + <td>$3,734</td>
801 - <td> 413 + <td>Baseline</td>
802 - <p>NA</p> 414 + <td>$4,055</td>
803 - </td> 415 + <td>Baseline</td>
804 - <td> 416 + <td>$4,259</td>
805 - <p>NA</p>
806 - </td>
807 - <td>
808 - <p>NA</p>
809 - </td>
810 - <td>
811 - <p>NA</p>
812 - </td>
813 - <td>
814 - <p>NA</p>
815 - </td>
816 - <td>
817 - <p>$3,734</p>
818 - </td>
819 </tr> 417 </tr>
820 <tr> 418 <tr>
821 - <td> 419 + <td><strong>CAR</strong></td>
822 - <p>CAR</p> 420 + <td>Baseline</td>
823 - </td> 421 + <td>NA</td>
824 - <td> 422 + <td>Baseline</td>
825 - <p>NA</p> 423 + <td>NA</td>
826 - </td> 424 + <td>Baseline</td>
827 - <td> 425 + <td>40.3</td>
828 - <p>NA</p>
829 - </td>
830 - <td>
831 - <p>NA</p>
832 - </td>
833 - <td>
834 - <p>NA</p>
835 - </td>
836 - <td>
837 - <p>NA</p>
838 - </td>
839 - <td>
840 - <p>NA</p>
841 - </td>
842 </tr> 426 </tr>
843 <tr> 427 <tr>
844 - <td> 428 + <td><strong>MSG</strong></td>
845 - <p>MSG</p> 429 + <td>Baseline</td>
846 - </td> 430 + <td>35.3%</td>
847 - <td> 431 + <td>Baseline</td>
848 - <p>NA</p> 432 + <td>NA</td>
849 - </td> 433 + <td>38.5%</td>
850 - <td> 434 + <td>52.6%</td>
851 - <p>NA</p>
852 - </td>
853 - <td>
854 - <p>NA</p>
855 - </td>
856 - <td>
857 - <p>NA</p>
858 - </td>
859 - <td>
860 - <p>NA</p>
861 - </td>
862 - <td>
863 - <p>35.3%</p>
864 - </td>
865 </tr> 435 </tr>
866 </tbody> 436 </tbody>
867 </table> 437 </table>
868 438
869 - <p><u>OAA Title V - Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP)</u></p> 439 + <p><strong><u>OAA Title V - Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP)</u></strong></p>
870 440
871 - <p>Performance level goals for each core indicator are agreed upon by USDOL and the grantee before the start of each program year (PY). USDOL evaluates the goals and performance of each grantee annually, making both available for public review. Prior to 2018, SCSEP was previously measured by six core performance measures, subject to goal setting and corrective action. These performance measures, along with a description of each, are listed below.</p> 441 + <p>Performance level goals for each core indicator are agreed upon by USDOL and the grantee before the start of each program year (PY). USDOL evaluates the goals and performance of each grantee annually, making both available for public review. SCSEP performance is measured by seven core performance measures, subject to goal setting and corrective action. These performance measures, along with a description of each, are listed below.</p>
872 442
873 - <ul> 443 + <p><strong>1. Service Level:</strong> The number of participants who are active on the last day of the reporting period or who exited during the reporting period divided by the number of modified community service positions<br />
874 - <li><strong>Community Service:&nbsp;</strong>The total number of hours of community service provided by participants divided by the number of hours of community service funded by the grant.</li> 444 + <strong>2. Community Service:&nbsp;</strong>The total number of hours of community service provided by participants divided by the number of hours of community service funded by the grant.<br />
875 - <li><strong>Entered Employment:&nbsp;</strong>The number of participants who are employed divided by the number of participants who exit.</li> 445 + <strong>3. Service Most in Need:&nbsp;</strong>Average number of employment barriers per participant. Barriers include having a severe disability; frail; age 75 or older; meet the eligibility requirements related to age for, but do not receive, benefits under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.); live in an area with persistent unemployment; have limited English proficiency; have low literacy skills; reside in a rural area; veteran; have low employment prospects; have failed to find employment after using services through the American Job Center system; or are homeless or at risk for homelessness.<br />
876 - <li><strong>Employment Retention:&nbsp;</strong>The number of participants who are employed divided by the number of participants who exit.</li> 446 + <strong>4. Employment Rate – 2<sup>nd</sup> Quarter after Exit:&nbsp;</strong>The number of participants employed in the second quarter after the exit quarter divided by the number of participants who exited two quarters earlier<br />
877 - <li><strong>Average Earnings:&amp;nbsp;</strong>Total earnings in the second and third quarters after exit; divided by the number of employed participants who exited.</li> 447 + <strong>5. Employment Rate – 4<sup>th&lt;/sup&gt; Quarter after Exit:</strong> The number of participants employed in the fourth quarter after the exit quarter divided by the number of participants who exited four quarters earlier<br />
878 - <li><strong>Service Level:&nbsp;</strong>Total number of participants served divided by a grantee’s authorized number of positions.</li> 448 + <strong>6. Median Earnings:&nbsp;</strong>Of those participants who are employed in the second quarter after the quarter of program exit, the median value of earnings in the second quarter after the exit quarter<br />
879 - <li><strong>Service Most in Need:&nbsp;</strong>Average number of employment barriers per participant. Barriers include having a severe disability; frail; age 75 or older; meet the eligibility requirements related to age for, but do not receive, benefits under title II of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 401 et seq.); live in an area with persistent unemployment; have limited English proficiency; have low literacy skills; reside in a rural area; veteran; have low employment prospects; have failed to find employment after using services through the American Job Center system; or are homeless or at risk for homelessness.</li> 449 + <strong>7. Effectiveness in serving employers, participants and host agencies:&nbsp;</strong>Customer satisfaction surveys for the SCSEP are distributed to all parties in involved in SCSEP efforts (i.e., employers, participants, and host agencies). Easterseals-Goodwill and ICOA are communicating the purpose of the survey to respondents and ensuring that they are being completed appropriately and mailed back on time.</p>
880 - </ul>
881 450
882 <p><strong>Table 32: Previous Assessment Results for the SCSEP Program</strong></p> 451 <p><strong>Table 32: Previous Assessment Results for the SCSEP Program</strong></p>
883 <thead> 452 <thead>
884 <tr> 453 <tr>
885 - <td> 454 + <td><strong>Performance Measure</strong></td>
886 - <p><strong>Performance Measure</strong></p> 455 + <td><strong>PY 18 Goal</strong></td>
887 - </td> 456 + <td><strong>PY 18 Actual</strong></td>
888 - <td> 457 + <td><strong>PY 18 %&nbsp;Met</strong></td>
889 - <p><strong>PY 16 Goal</strong></p> 458 + <td><strong>PY 19 Goal</strong></td>
890 - </td> 459 + <td><strong>PY 19 Actual</strong></td>
891 - <td> 460 + <td><strong>PY 19 % Met</strong></td>
892 - <p><strong>PY 16 Actual</strong></p>
893 - </td>
894 - <td>
895 - <p><strong>PY 16 %&nbsp; Met</strong></p>
896 - </td>
897 - <td>
898 - <p><strong>PY 17 Goal</strong></p>
899 - </td>
900 - <td>
901 - <p><strong>PY 17 Actual</strong></p>
902 - </td>
903 - <td>
904 - <p><strong>PY 17 % Met</strong></p>
905 - </td>
906 </tr> 461 </tr>
907 </thead> 462 </thead>
908 <tbody> 463 <tbody>
909 <tr> 464 <tr>
910 - <td> 465 + <td>Service Level</td>
911 - <p>Community Service</p> 466 + <td>150.0%</td>
912 - </td> 467 + <td>123.3%</td>
913 - <td> 468 + <td>82.2%</td>
914 - <p>80.0 %</p> 469 + <td>151.3%</td>
915 - </td> 470 + <td>143.2%</td>
916 - <td> 471 + <td>94.6%</td>
917 - <p>N/A</p>
918 - </td>
919 - <td>
920 - <p>N/A</p>
921 - </td>
922 - <td>
923 - <p>80.0%</p>
924 - </td>
925 - <td>
926 - <p>79.3%</p>
927 - </td>
928 - <td>
929 - <p>99.1%</p>
930 - </td>
931 </tr> 472 </tr>
932 <tr> 473 <tr>
933 - <td> 474 + <td>Community Service</td>
934 - <p>Entered Employment</p> 475 + <td>75.9%</td>
935 - </td> 476 + <td>76.9%</td>
936 - <td> 477 + <td>101.3%</td>
937 - <p>46.1%</p> 478 + <td>76.9%</td>
938 - </td> 479 + <td>74.4%</td>
939 - <td> 480 + <td>96.7%</td>
940 - <p>39.1%</p>
941 - </td>
942 - <td>
943 - <p>84.8%</p>
944 - </td>
945 - <td>
946 - <p>46.2%</p>
947 - </td>
948 - <td>
949 - <p>5.6%</p>
950 - </td>
951 - <td>
952 - <p>12.1%</p>
953 - </td>
954 </tr> 481 </tr>
955 <tr> 482 <tr>
956 - <td> 483 + <td>Service to Most in Need</td>
957 - <p>Employment Retention</p> 484 + <td>2.90</td>
958 - </td> 485 + <td>3.11</td>
959 - <td> 486 + <td>107.2%</td>
960 - <p>73.0%</p> 487 + <td>2.90</td>
961 - </td> 488 + <td>3.35</td>
962 - <td> 489 + <td>115.5%</td>
963 - <p>36.4%</p>
964 - </td>
965 - <td>
966 - <p>49.9</p>
967 - </td>
968 - <td>
969 - <p>72.1%</p>
970 - </td>
971 - <td>
972 - <p>50.0%</p>
973 - </td>
974 - <td>
975 - <p>69.3%</p>
976 - </td>
977 </tr> 490 </tr>
978 <tr> 491 <tr>
979 - <td> 492 + <td>Employment Rate – Q2</td>
980 - <p>Average Earnings</p> 493 + <td>33.5%</td>
981 - </td> 494 + <td>19.0%</td>
982 - <td> 495 + <td>56.7%</td>
983 - <p>7597</p> 496 + <td>31.5%</td>
984 - </td> 497 + <td>21.7%</td>
985 - <td> 498 + <td>68.9%</td>
986 - <p>10001</p>
987 - </td>
988 - <td>
989 - <p>131.6%</p>
990 - </td>
991 - <td>
992 - <p>8711</p>
993 - </td>
994 - <td>
995 - <p>3965</p>
996 - </td>
997 - <td>
998 - <p>45.5%</p>
999 - </td>
1000 </tr> 499 </tr>
1001 <tr> 500 <tr>
1002 - <td> 501 + <td>Employment Rate – Q4</td>
1003 - <p>Service Level</p> 502 + <td>32.1%</td>
1004 - </td> 503 + <td>13.0%</td>
1005 - <td> 504 + <td>40.5%</td>
1006 - <p>175.0%</p> 505 + <td>26.0%</td>
1007 - </td> 506 + <td>13.6%</td>
1008 - <td> 507 + <td>52.3%</td>
1009 - <p>N/A</p> 508 + </tr>
1010 - </td> 509 + <tr>
1011 - <td> 510 + <td>Median Earnings</td>
1012 - <p>N/A</p> 511 + <td>$2792</td>
1013 - </td> 512 + <td>$2080</td>
1014 - <td> 513 + <td>74.5%</td>
1015 - <p>175.0%</p> 514 + <td>2758</td>
1016 - </td> 515 + <td>1734</td>
1017 - <td> 516 + <td>62.9%</td>
1018 - <p>137.2%</p>
1019 - </td>
1020 - <td>
1021 - <p>78.4%</p>
1022 - </td>
1023 </tr> 517 </tr>
1024 <tr> 518 <tr>
519 + <td>Employer, Participant, &amp; Host Agency Effectiveness</td>
1025 <td> 520 <td>
1026 - <p>Service Most in Need</p> 521 + <ul>
522 + <li>&nbsp;</li>
523 + </ul>
1027 </td> 524 </td>
1028 <td> 525 <td>
1029 - <p>2.80</p> 526 + <ul>
527 + <li>&nbsp;</li>
528 + </ul>
1030 </td> 529 </td>
1031 <td> 530 <td>
1032 - <p>2.74</p> 531 + <ul>
532 + <li>&nbsp;</li>
533 + </ul>
1033 </td> 534 </td>
1034 <td> 535 <td>
1035 - <p>97.9%</p> 536 + <ul>
537 + <li>&nbsp;</li>
538 + </ul>
1036 </td> 539 </td>
1037 <td> 540 <td>
1038 - <p>2.75</p> 541 + <ul>
542 + <li>&nbsp;</li>
543 + </ul>
1039 </td> 544 </td>
1040 <td> 545 <td>
1041 - <p>2.71</p> 546 + <ul>
1042 - &lt;/td&gt; 547 + <li>&amp;nbsp;</li>
1043 - <td> 548 + </ul>
1044 - <p>98.5%</p>
1045 </td> 549 </td>
550 + </tr>
551 + <tr>
552 + <td>Employers</td>
553 + <td>85.8</td>
554 + <td>N/A</td>
555 + <td>N/A</td>
556 + <td>85.8</td>
557 + <td>N/A</td>
558 + <td>N/A</td>
559 + </tr>
560 + <tr>
561 + <td>Participants</td>
562 + <td>79.5</td>
563 + <td>N/A</td>
564 + <td>N/A</td>
565 + <td>80.5</td>
566 + <td>N/A</td>
567 + <td>N/A</td>
568 + </tr>
569 + <tr>
570 + <td>Host Agencies</td>
571 + <td>79.7</td>
572 + <td>N/A</td>
573 + <td>N/A</td>
574 + <td>80.7</td>
575 + <td>N/A</td>
576 + <td>N/A</td>
1046 </tr> 577 </tr>
1047 </tbody> 578 </tbody>
1048 </table> 579 </table>
1049 580
1050 - <p>The Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration adopted as a final rule, without change, the interim final rule (IFR) published by the Department in the December 1, 2017 Federal Register. The IFR revised performance accountability measures for the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP). The Older Americans Act (OAA) Reauthorization Act of 2016 amended the measures of performance for the SCSEP program in large part to align them with the performance measures mandated for programs under WIOA (listed earlier) and required implementation, including through regulation by December 31, 2017. Below are the core performance measures for PY18 with the newly revised performance measures:</p> 581 + <p>The Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration adopted as a final rule, without change, the interim final rule (IFR) published by the Department in the December 1, 2017 Federal Register. The IFR revised performance accountability measures for the Senior Community Service Employment Program (SCSEP). The Older Americans Act (OAA) Reauthorization Act of 2016 amended the measures of performance for the SCSEP program in large part to align them with the performance measures mandated for programs under WIOA (listed earlier) and required implementation, including through regulation by December 31, 2017. Below are the core performance measures for PY20 with the newly revised performance measures:</p>
1051 582
1052 <p><strong>Table 33: Previous Assessment Results for SCSEP Program –WIOA Basis</strong></p> 583 <p><strong>Table 33: Previous Assessment Results for SCSEP Program –WIOA Basis</strong></p>
1053 <thead> 584 <thead>
1054 <tr> 585 <tr>
1055 - <td> 586 + <td><strong>Performance Measure</strong></td>
1056 - <p><strong>Performance Measure</strong></p> 587 + <td><strong>PY 20 Goal</strong></td>
1057 - </td> 588 + <td><strong>PY 20 Actual</strong></td>
1058 - <td> 589 + <td><strong>PY 20 %&nbsp; Met</strong></td>
1059 - <p><strong>PY 18 Goal</strong></p>
1060 - </td>
1061 - <td>
1062 - <p><strong>PY 18 Actual</strong></p>
1063 - </td>
1064 - <td>
1065 - <p><strong>PY 18 %&nbsp; Met</strong></p>
1066 - </td>
1067 </tr> 590 </tr>
1068 </thead> 591 </thead>
1069 <tbody> 592 <tbody>
1070 <tr> 593 <tr>
1071 - <td> 594 + <td>Service Level*</td>
1072 - <p>Service Level</p> 595 + <td>N/A</td>
1073 - </td> 596 + <td>N/A</td>
1074 - <td> 597 + <td>N/A</td>
1075 - <p>150.0%</p>
1076 - </td>
1077 - <td>
1078 - <p>123.3%</p>
1079 - </td>
1080 - <td>
1081 - <p>82.2%</p>
1082 - </td>
1083 </tr> 598 </tr>
1084 <tr> 599 <tr>
1085 - <td> 600 + <td>Community Service*</td>
1086 - <p>Community Service</p> 601 + <td>N/A</td>
1087 - </td> 602 + <td>N/A</td>
1088 - <td> 603 + <td>N/A</td>
1089 - <p>75.9%</p>
1090 - </td>
1091 - <td>
1092 - <p>76.9%</p>
1093 - </td>
1094 - <td>
1095 - <p>101.3%</p>
1096 - </td>
1097 </tr> 604 </tr>
1098 <tr> 605 <tr>
1099 - <td> 606 + <td>Service to Most in Need</td>
1100 - <p>Service to Most in Need</p> 607 + <td>2.90</td>
1101 - </td> 608 + <td>3.47</td>
1102 - <td> 609 + <td>119.7%</td>
1103 - <p>2.90</p>
1104 - </td>
1105 - <td>
1106 - <p>3.11</p>
1107 - </td>
1108 - <td>
1109 - <p>107.2%</p>
1110 - </td>
1111 </tr> 610 </tr>
1112 <tr> 611 <tr>
1113 - <td> 612 + <td>Employment Rate - Q2</td>
1114 - <p>ER Q2</p> 613 + <td>28.5%</td>
1115 - </td> 614 + <td>27.8%</td>
1116 - <td> 615 + <td>97.5%</td>
1117 - <p>33.5%</p>
1118 - </td>
1119 - <td>
1120 - <p>19.0%</p>
1121 - </td>
1122 - <td>
1123 - <p>56.7%</p>
1124 - </td>
1125 </tr> 616 </tr>
1126 <tr> 617 <tr>
1127 - <td> 618 + <td>Employment Rate - Q4</td>
1128 - <p>ER Q4</p> 619 + <td>23.5%</td>
1129 - </td> 620 + <td>26.3%</td>
1130 - <td> 621 + <td>111.9%</td>
1131 - <p>32.1%</p>
1132 - </td>
1133 - <td>
1134 - <p>13.0%</p>
1135 - </td>
1136 - <td>
1137 - <p>40.5%</p>
1138 - </td>
1139 </tr> 622 </tr>
1140 <tr> 623 <tr>
1141 - <td> 624 + <td>Median Earnings</td>
1142 - <p>ME Q2</p> 625 + <td>$2735</td>
1143 - </td> 626 + <td>$3656</td>
1144 - <td> 627 + <td>133.7%</td>
1145 - <p>$2792</p>
1146 - </td>
1147 - <td>
1148 - <p>$2080</p>
1149 - </td>
1150 - <td>
1151 - <p>74.5%</p>
1152 - </td>
1153 </tr> 628 </tr>
1154 <tr> 629 <tr>
1155 - <td> 630 + <td>Employers</td>
1156 - <p>Employer, Participant, &amp; Host Agency Effectiveness</p> 631 + <td>85.8%</td>
1157 - </td> 632 + <td>N/A</td>
1158 - <td> 633 + <td>N/A</td>
1159 - <p>&nbsp;</p>
1160 - </td>
1161 - <td>
1162 - <p>&nbsp;</p>
1163 - </td>
1164 - <td>
1165 - <p>&nbsp;</p>
1166 - </td>
1167 </tr> 634 </tr>
1168 <tr> 635 <tr>
1169 - <td> 636 + <td>Participants</td>
1170 - <p>Employers</p> 637 + <td>80.5%</td>
1171 - </td> 638 + <td>N/A</td>
1172 - <td> 639 + <td>N/A</td>
1173 - <p>85.8%</p>
1174 - </td>
1175 - <td>
1176 - <p>N/A</p>
1177 - </td>
1178 - <td>
1179 - <p>N/A</p>
1180 - </td>
1181 </tr> 640 </tr>
1182 <tr> 641 <tr>
1183 - <td> 642 + <td>Host Agencies</td>
1184 - <p>Participants</p> 643 + <td>80.7%</td>
1185 - </td> 644 + <td>N/A</td>
1186 - <td> 645 + <td>N/A</td>
1187 - <p>79.5%</p>
1188 - </td>
1189 - <td>
1190 - <p>N/A</p>
1191 - </td>
1192 - <td>
1193 - <p>N/A</p>
1194 - </td>
1195 - </tr>
1196 - <tr>
1197 - <td>
1198 - <p>Host Agencies</p>
1199 - </td>
1200 - <td>
1201 - <p>79.7%</p>
1202 - </td>
1203 - <td>
1204 - <p>N/A</p>
1205 - </td>
1206 - <td>
1207 - <p>N/A</p>
1208 - </td>
1209 </tr> 646 </tr>
1210 </tbody> 647 </tbody>
1211 </table> 648 </table>
649 +
650 + <p><em>*</em><sup>Because of the pandemic, USDOL determined that <em>Service Level</em> and <em>Community Service</em> measures would not be tracked due to host agency shutdowns.</sup></p>
1212 651
1213 <p><em>SCSEP Strategies to Improve Performance Measures</em></p> 652 <p><em>SCSEP Strategies to Improve Performance Measures</em></p>
1214 653
1215 - <p><strong>Community service and Service Level:</strong>&nbsp;The U.S. Department of Labor determines every year how many positions will be available for the SCSEP on a national and state level. After negotiations and or funding changes, sometimes positions will get modified. The assessment results above show that the modified positions were changed in the middle of the third quarter of PY 2016 to reflect the awards made to national grantees by the 2016 competition and changes to Equitable Distribution based on the latest Census data. Fields in the Quarterly Performance Reports cannot be accurately reported for the third and fourth quarters of PY 2016 or for the final end-of-year QPR for PY 2016.</p> 654 + <p><strong>Community service and Service Level:</strong>&nbsp;The U.S. Department of Labor determines every year how many positions will be available for the SCSEP on a national and state level. After negotiations and or funding changes, positions may get modified. The assessment results above show that the performance measures for “Service Level” and “Community Service” were not taken into account due to the effect that the COVID-19 pandemic had on SCSEP participation.</p>
1216 655
1217 - <p>The&nbsp;<strong>employment rate</strong>&nbsp;(after 2<sup>nd</sup> and 4<sup>th</sup> quarters) measure did not meet project goals (56.7% and 40.5%, respectively). ICOA is working on making program improvements with a new subrecipient, Easterseals-Goodwill, in order to ensure that employment rate goals are met.</p> 656 + <p>The&nbsp;<strong>employment rate&nbsp;after 2<sup>nd</sup> quarter</strong> measure did not meet the project goal of 28.5% (actual: 27.8%); however, the <strong>employment rate after 4<sup>th</sup> quarter</strong> (goal: 23.5%) was exceeded (actual: 26.3%).</p>
1218 657
1219 - <p&gt;The&nbsp;<strong>employment retention</strong>&nbsp;measure increased from 36.4% to 50% under the previous subrecipient. With the new subrecipient and newly revised core performance measures in place, consistent follow up with exited participants will be emphasized in order to ensure that employment retention goals are met. The individual employment plan (IEP) of every participant that Easterseals-Goodwill is tailored to ensure that employment after SCSEP is plausible and aligned with the participants’ long term goals.</p> 658 + <p><strong>The median earnings</strong>&nbsp;goal (goal: $2735) for PY 20 was exceeded (actual: $3656). ICOA’s subrecipient, Easterseals-Goodwill, will continue working with participants in searching for and securing employment that compensates adequately to maintain this goal.</p>
1220 659
1221 - <p><strong>The average earnings</strong>&nbsp;goal for PY 17 were not met at 45.5%. With the new performance measure of median earnings for PY 18, the goal was not met at 74.5%. The new subrecipient, Easterseals-Goodwill, will work with participants in searching for and securing employment that compensates adequately to maintain this goal.</p> 660 + <p>The&nbsp;<strong>service to most in need</strong>&nbsp;performance measure (goal: 2.90) exceeded the PY goal (actual: 3.47). As positions open Easterseals-Goodwill will prioritize participants with barriers to employment first. Easterseals-Goodwill will also ensure that priority of service is given to veterans and ensure positions are filled in rural areas where employment opportunities are limited.</p>
1222 -
1223 - <p>The&nbsp;<strong>most in need</strong>&nbsp;performance measure increased from 2.71% to 3.11% average employment barriers per participant. As positions open Easterseals-Goodwill will prioritize participants with barriers to employment first. Easterseals-Goodwill will also ensure that priority of service is given to veterans and ensure positions are filled in rural areas where employment opportunities are limited.</p>
1224 661
1225 <p><strong>SCSEP Customer Satisfaction Surveys – American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for employers, participants, and host agencies</strong>: Customer satisfaction surveys for the SCSEP are distributed to all parties in involved in SCSEP efforts (i.e., employers, participants, and host agencies). Easterseals-Goodwill and ICOA are communicating the purpose of the survey to respondents and ensuring that they are being completed appropriately and mailed back on time.</p> 662 <p><strong>SCSEP Customer Satisfaction Surveys – American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) for employers, participants, and host agencies</strong>: Customer satisfaction surveys for the SCSEP are distributed to all parties in involved in SCSEP efforts (i.e., employers, participants, and host agencies). Easterseals-Goodwill and ICOA are communicating the purpose of the survey to respondents and ensuring that they are being completed appropriately and mailed back on time.</p>
1226 663
1227 - <p><u>Trade Adjustment Assistance</u></p> 664 + <p><strong><u>Trade Adjustment Assistance</u></strong></p>
1228 665
1229 <p>The Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program does not have state negotiated performance measures. The Trade Adjustment Assistance program previously reported two sets of measures - those defined by the Trade Adjustment Assistance Act (aligned with WIOA under TAARA 2015) and Common Measures. USDOL only established TAA program goals under Common Measures and not, however, for the TAA measures. The program now reports solely under the first three WIOA primary indicators of performance listed at the beginning of this section.</p> 666 <p>The Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program does not have state negotiated performance measures. The Trade Adjustment Assistance program previously reported two sets of measures - those defined by the Trade Adjustment Assistance Act (aligned with WIOA under TAARA 2015) and Common Measures. USDOL only established TAA program goals under Common Measures and not, however, for the TAA measures. The program now reports solely under the first three WIOA primary indicators of performance listed at the beginning of this section.</p>
1230 667
1231 - <p>For FY18, Idaho well exceeded the national results for entered employment rates, which was slightly lower in the previous fiscal year.&nbsp; TAA performance measure period is based on federal fiscal year (FY), which ranges from October through September. FY17 measures October 1, 2016 through September 30, 2017, while FY18 would measure the same period the following year.</p> 668 + <p>For FY18, Idaho well exceeded the national results for entered employment rates, which was slightly lower in the previous fiscal year.&nbsp; TAA performance measure period is based on federal fiscal year (FY), which ranges from October through September. FY19 measures October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019, while FY20 and FY21 would measure the same period the following years.</p>
1232 669
1233 <p><strong>Table 34: Previous Assessment Results for TAA Program&nbsp;</strong></p> 670 <p><strong>Table 34: Previous Assessment Results for TAA Program&nbsp;</strong></p>
1234 <thead> 671 <thead>
1235 <tr> 672 <tr>
1236 - <td> 673 + <td><strong>Measure</strong></td>
1237 - <p><strong>Measure</strong></p> 674 + <td><strong>FY19 Actual</strong></td>
1238 - </td> 675 + <td><strong>FY20 Actual</strong></td>
1239 - <td> 676 + <td><strong>FY21&amp;nbsp; Actual</strong></td>
1240 - <p><strong>FY17 </strong></p>
1241 -
1242 - <p><strong>Idaho Results</strong></p>
1243 - </td>
1244 - <td>
1245 - <p><strong>FY17 </strong></p>
1246 -
1247 - <p><strong>National Results</strong></p>
1248 - </td>
1249 - <td>
1250 - <p><strong>FY18 &lt;/strong&gt;</p>
1251 -
1252 - <p><strong>Idaho Results</strong></p>
1253 - </td>
1254 - <td>
1255 - <p><strong>FY18 </strong></p>
1256 -
1257 - <p><strong>National Results</strong></p>
1258 - </td>
1259 </tr> 677 </tr>
1260 </thead> 678 </thead>
1261 <tbody> 679 <tbody>
1262 <tr> 680 <tr>
1263 - <td> 681 + <td><strong>ER Q2</strong></td>
1264 - <p>ER Q2</p> 682 + <td>83.7%</td>
1265 - </td> 683 + <td>73.7%</td>
1266 - <td> 684 + <td>81.8%</td>
1267 - <p>74.8%</p>
1268 - </td>
1269 - <td>
1270 - <p>74.8%</p>
1271 - </td>
1272 - <td>
1273 - <p>84.6%</p>
1274 - </td>
1275 - <td>
1276 - <p>76.6%</p>
1277 - </td>
1278 </tr> 685 </tr>
1279 <tr> 686 <tr>
1280 - <td> 687 + <td><strong>ER Q4</strong></td>
1281 - <p>ER Q4</p> 688 + <td>86.7%</td>
1282 - </td> 689 + <td>82.9%</td>
1283 - <td> 690 + <td>68.8%</td>
1284 - <p>49.3%</p>
1285 - </td>
1286 - <td>
1287 - <p>74.0%</p>
1288 - </td>
1289 - <td>
1290 - <p>83.5%</p>
1291 - </td>
1292 - <td>
1293 - <p>75.2%</p>
1294 - </td>
1295 </tr> 691 </tr>
1296 <tr> 692 <tr>
1297 - <td> 693 + <td><strong>ME Q2</strong></td>
1298 - <p>ME Q2</p> 694 + <td>$9,738</td>
1299 - </td> 695 + <td>$9,629</td>
1300 - <td> 696 + <td>$8,527</td>
1301 - <p>$7,022</p> 697 + </tr>
1302 - </td> 698 + <tr>
1303 - <td> 699 + <td><strong>CAR</strong></td>
1304 - <p>$8,039</p> 700 + <td>80.0%</td>
1305 - </td> 701 + <td>84.0%</td>
1306 - <td> 702 + <td>78.1%</td>
1307 - <p>$7,827</p> 703 + </tr>
1308 - </td> 704 + <tr>
1309 - <td> 705 + <td><strong>MSG</strong></td>
1310 - <p>$8,892</p> 706 + <td>18.9%</td>
1311 - </td> 707 + <td>24.2%</td>
708 + <td>61.7%</td>
1312 </tr> 709 </tr>
1313 </tbody> 710 </tbody>
1314 </table> 711 </table>
1315 712
1316 - <p>It should be noted when comparing Idaho’s wages to the nation’s there is a significant difference between the wage markets. The annual mean wage in the United States for all occupations (May 2018 – U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics) is $51,960 while the wage in Idaho for the same period is $43,480. Increasing wages for the Idaho workforce is definitely a priority and directly corresponds to expanding services to rural communities.</p> 713 + <p>It should be noted when comparing Idaho’s wages to the nation’s there is a significant difference between the wage markets. The annual mean wage in the United States for all occupations (May 2020 – U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics) is $56,310 while the mean wage in Idaho for the same period is $46,800. Increasing wages for the Idaho workforce is definitely a priority and directly corresponds to expanding services to rural communities.</p>
1317 714
1318 - <p><u>Veterans’ Employment</u></p> 715 + <p><strong><u>Veterans’ Employment</u></strong></p>
1319 716
1320 - <p>As noted in the State’s PY2018 Modification, USDOL did not require performance measures for states implementing Veterans’ Employment and Training Service (VETS) programs. It was estimated new program performance measures would be in place for PY 2018. USDOL resumed quarterly reporting for the program, with the first reports to be submitted in November of 2018.&nbsp;&nbsp;Previously, the program had had established thirteen performance measures, (similar to those under WIA) which focus on the effectiveness of the services delivered to veterans, noting the two distinct sets of services: the Local Veterans Employment Representatives (LVERs) and Disabled Veterans Outreach Program specialists (DVOPs). However, like many other programs, VETS now only requires states to address the first three primary indicators of performance under WIOA.&nbsp; Because of the implementation of this recent change and lack of data, the state has only last year’s data to present.&nbsp;</p> 717 + <p>VETS did not initially require states to report on all five WIOA measures since it did not collect all the data necessary to complete reporting on each measure. However, since then, it began data collection for all five which are shown in the table below. This now mirrors reporting for most WIOA Title I-B and TAA programs.</p>
1321 718
1322 <p><strong>Table 35: Previous Assessment Results for VETS Program</strong></p> 719 <p><strong>Table 35: Previous Assessment Results for VETS Program</strong></p>
1323 <thead> 720 <thead>
1324 <tr> 721 <tr>
1325 - <td> 722 + <td><strong>Measure</strong></td>
1326 - <p><strong>Measure</strong></p> 723 + <td><strong>PY19 Goals</strong></td>
1327 - </td> 724 + <td><strong>PY19 ID Results</strong></td>
1328 - <td> 725 + <td><strong>PY20 Goals</strong></td>
1329 - <p><strong>PY18 </strong></p> 726 + <td><strong>PY20 ID Results </strong></td>
1330 -
1331 - <p><strong>Goals</strong></p>
1332 - </td>
1333 - <td>
1334 - <p><strong>PY18&nbsp; </strong></p>
1335 -
1336 - <p><strong>ID Results</strong></p>
1337 - </td>
1338 - <td>
1339 - <p><strong>PY19 </strong></p>
1340 -
1341 - <p><strong>Goals</strong></p>
1342 - </td>
1343 - <td>
1344 - <p><strong>PY19&nbsp;</strong></p>
1345 -
1346 - <p><strong>ID Results (Q1)</strong></p>
1347 - </td>
1348 </tr> 727 </tr>
1349 </thead> 728 </thead>
1350 <tbody> 729 <tbody>
1351 <tr> 730 <tr>
1352 - <td> 731 + <td><strong>ER Q2</strong></td>
1353 - <p>ER Q2</p> 732 + <td>64.0%</td>
1354 - </td> 733 + <td>65.9%</td>
1355 - <td> 734 + <td>63.0%</td>
1356 - <p>63.0%</p> 735 + <td>63.4%</td>
1357 - </td>
1358 - <td>
1359 - <p>65.9%</p>
1360 - </td>
1361 - <td>
1362 - <p>64.0%</p>
1363 - </td>
1364 - <td>
1365 - <p>66.7%</p>
1366 - </td>
1367 </tr> 736 </tr>
1368 <tr> 737 <tr>
1369 - <td> 738 + <td><strong>ER Q4</strong></td>
1370 - <p>ER Q4</p> 739 + <td>62.0%</td>
1371 - </td> 740 + <td>56.2%</td>
1372 - <td> 741 + <td>61.0%</td>
1373 - <p>61.0%</p> 742 + <td>63.8%</td>
1374 - </td>
1375 - <td>
1376 - <p>56.2%</p>
1377 - </td>
1378 - <td>
1379 - <p>62.0%</p>
1380 - </td>
1381 - <td>
1382 - <p>58.1%</p>
1383 - </td>
1384 </tr> 743 </tr>
1385 <tr> 744 <tr>
1386 - <td> 745 + <td><strong>ME Q2</strong></td>
1387 - <p>ME Q2</p> 746 + <td>$6,500</td>
1388 - </td> 747 + <td>$6,067</td>
1389 - <td> 748 + <td>$5,500</td>
1390 - <p>$5,400</p> 749 + <td>$5,308</td>
1391 - </td>
1392 - <td>
1393 - <p>$6,067</p>
1394 - </td>
1395 - <td>
1396 - <p>$6,500</p>
1397 - </td>
1398 - <td>
1399 - <p>$5,963</p>
1400 - </td>
1401 </tr> 750 </tr>
1402 </tbody> 751 </tbody>
1403 </table> 752 </table>
1404 753
1405 - <p><u>Unemployment Insurance</u></p> 754 + <p><strong><u>Unemployment Insurance</u></strong></p>
1406 755
1407 <p>The Unemployment Insurance program has approximately 30 reports that reflect various aspects of the program performance. However in the context of the One-Stop service delivery system, the Unemployment Insurance program will be assessed by evaluating its performance in service delivery to claimants. The cores measure for services to claimants in the UI program are: “All First Payments 14/21-day Timeliness” and “Nonmonetary Determinations 21-day Timeliness.” These performance measures reveal the timeliness of processing and paying UI claimants’ claims.</p> 756 <p>The Unemployment Insurance program has approximately 30 reports that reflect various aspects of the program performance. However in the context of the One-Stop service delivery system, the Unemployment Insurance program will be assessed by evaluating its performance in service delivery to claimants. The cores measure for services to claimants in the UI program are: “All First Payments 14/21-day Timeliness” and “Nonmonetary Determinations 21-day Timeliness.” These performance measures reveal the timeliness of processing and paying UI claimants’ claims.</p>
1408 757
1409 - <p>The standard for first unemployment insurance payments made within 14 days is 87%. Idaho not only exceeds the standard, but ranks among the highest in the nation in its percent.</p> 758 + <p>The standard for first unemployment insurance payments made within 14 days is 87%. Idaho not only exceeds the standard but ranks among the highest in the nation in its percent.</p>
1410 759
1411 <p>A second core measure is the timeliness of nonmonetary determinations. A nonmonetary determination is a written notice to the worker and other interested parties which advises of the worker’s eligibility with respect to acts or circumstances which are potentially disqualifying. The standard for these decisions to be made is 80% within 21 days. Idaho does not currently meet the standard of 80% but continues to work on methods to improve non-mon timeliness including training, monitoring individual performance and process improvement.</p> 760 <p>A second core measure is the timeliness of nonmonetary determinations. A nonmonetary determination is a written notice to the worker and other interested parties which advises of the worker’s eligibility with respect to acts or circumstances which are potentially disqualifying. The standard for these decisions to be made is 80% within 21 days. Idaho does not currently meet the standard of 80% but continues to work on methods to improve non-mon timeliness including training, monitoring individual performance and process improvement.</p>
1412 <thead> 761 <thead>
1413 <tr> 762 <tr>
1414 - <td> 763 + <td><strong>Fiscal Year</strong></td>
1415 - <p><strong>Fiscal Year</strong></p> 764 + <td><strong>First Payments within 14 days</strong></td>
1416 - </td> 765 + <td><strong>Rank</strong></td>
1417 - <td>
1418 - <p><strong>First Payments within 14 days</strong></p>
1419 - </td>
1420 - <td>
1421 - <p><strong>Rank</strong></p>
1422 - </td>
1423 </tr> 766 </tr>
1424 </thead> 767 </thead>
1425 <tbody> 768 <tbody>
1426 <tr> 769 <tr>
1427 - <td> 770 + <td>FY 2013</td>
1428 - <p>FY 2013</p> 771 + <td>90.5%</td>
1429 - </td> 772 + <td>9<sup>th</sup></td>
1430 - <td>
1431 - <p>90.5%</p>
1432 - </td>
1433 - <td>
1434 - <p>9<sup>th</sup></p>
1435 - </td>
1436 </tr> 773 </tr>
1437 <tr> 774 <tr>
1438 - <td> 775 + <td>FY 2014</td>
1439 - <p>FY 2014</p> 776 + <td>87.2%</td>
1440 - </td> 777 + <td>24<sup>th</sup></td>
1441 - <td>
1442 - <p>87.2%</p>
1443 - </td>
1444 - <td>
1445 - <p>24<sup>th</sup></p>
1446 - </td>
1447 </tr> 778 </tr>
1448 <tr> 779 <tr>
1449 - <td> 780 + <td>FY 2015</td>
1450 - <p>FY 2015</p> 781 + <td>96.5%</td>
1451 - </td> 782 + <td>2<sup>nd</sup></td>
1452 - <td>
1453 - <p>96.5%</p>
1454 - </td>
1455 - <td>
1456 - <p>2<sup>nd</sup></p>
1457 - </td>
1458 </tr> 783 </tr>
1459 <tr> 784 <tr>
1460 - <td> 785 + <td>FY 2016</td>
1461 - <p>FY 2016</p> 786 + <td>96.5%</td>
1462 - </td> 787 + <td>1<sup>st</sup></td>
1463 - <td>
1464 - <p>96.5%</p>
1465 - </td>
1466 - <td>
1467 - <p>1<sup>st</sup></p>
1468 - </td>
1469 </tr> 788 </tr>
1470 <tr> 789 <tr>
1471 - <td> 790 + <td>FY 2017</td>
1472 - <p>FY 2017</p> 791 + <td>97.1%</td>
1473 - </td> 792 + <td>2<sup>nd</sup></td>
1474 - <td>
1475 - <p>97.1%</p>
1476 - </td>
1477 - <td>
1478 - <p>2<sup>nd</sup></p>
1479 - </td>
1480 </tr> 793 </tr>
1481 <tr> 794 <tr>
1482 - <td> 795 + <td>FY 2018</td>
1483 - <p>FY 2018</p> 796 + <td>96.9%</td>
1484 - </td> 797 + <td>2<sup>nd</sup></td>
1485 - <td>
1486 - <p>96.9%</p>
1487 - </td>
1488 - <td>
1489 - <p>2<sup>nd</sup></p>
1490 - </td>
1491 </tr> 798 </tr>
1492 <tr> 799 <tr>
1493 - <td> 800 + <td>FY 2019</td>
1494 - <p>FY 2019</p> 801 + <td>97.1%</td>
1495 - </td> 802 + <td>3<sup>rd</sup></td>
1496 - <td> 803 + </tr>
1497 - <p>97.1%</p> 804 + <tr>
1498 - </td> 805 + <td>FY 2020</td>
1499 - <td> 806 + <td>66.3%</td>
1500 - <p>3<sup>rd</sup></p> 807 + <td>42<sup>nd</sup></td>
1501 - </td> 808 + </tr>
809 + <tr>
810 + <td>FY 2021</td>
811 + <td>65.7%</td>
812 + <td>20<sup>th</sup></td>
1502 </tr> 813