Enter Narrative |
1 |
- |
<p>(i) Employment and Unemployment Trends</p>
|
1 |
+ |
<p><strong><em>The state plans on addressing several technical assistance items identified by the federal review team after the plan’s submission.</em></strong></p>
|
|
|
|
2 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
3 |
+ |
<p><strong><em>(i) EMPLOYMENT AND UNEMPLOYMENT TRENDS</em></strong></p>
|
2 |
|
|
4 |
|
|
3 |
|
<p><strong>General Employment Trends</strong></p>
|
5 |
|
<p><strong>General Employment Trends</strong></p>
|
4 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
5 |
- |
<p>In Idaho, jobs grew at a healthy pace from 2003 through 2006. By mid-2007, the growth began to slow and ended in August when the number of people employed began to decline and continued to decline through mid-2009. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased from a record low of 2.9 percent in March 2007 to 9.6 percent in June 2009. At this point, the unemployment rate reached its highest level and remained at this level for the longest period of time since the recession in 1982 and 1983 when the rate peaked at 10.2 percent in December 1982.</p>
|
7 |
+ |
<p>In Idaho, jobs grew at a healthy pace from 2003 through 2006. By mid-2007, the growth began to slow and ended in August when the number of people employed began to decline and continued to decrease through mid-2009. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate increased from a low of 2.9 percent in March 2007 to 9.6 percent in June 2009. However, following this sharp increase in the unemployment rate, Idaho’s economy began to recover, and the unemployment rate steadily declined over the next several years to a record low of 2.5 percent in late-2019.</p>
|
6 |
|
|
8 |
|
|
7 |
- |
<p>However, Idaho’s economy has now fully recovered. The unemployment experienced a record low seasonally adjusted unemployment rate of 2.7 percent in September and October 2018. The rate has since fluctuated between 2.8 percent and 2.9 percent. The seasonally adjusted unemployment rate has stayed below the national rate since August 2009 (Figure 3). </p>
|
9 |
+ |
<p>Following the emergence in COVID-19 in early 2020 and the Idaho Governor’s Stay-at-Home order in response, Idaho experienced a sharp spike in unemployment, reaching a record high of 11.6 percent unemployment in April 2020. By the end of 2020, Idaho’s economy showed signs of recovery, with unemployment rates declining to 3.8 percent by December. Idaho’s unemployment rate has continued to remain below the national average since 2001. Figure 3 (below) shows the comparison of Idaho’s seasonally adjusted unemployment rate to the national average.</p>
|
8 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
9 |
- |
<p><img alt="Figure 3 - Comparison of Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Rates between Idaho and the nation, from January 1979 through January 2019" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="ba7ba5c9-1367-41c4-be4c-4407c22b0ea2" src="/sites/default/files/inline-images/Figure%203%20-%20Comparison%20of%20Seasonally%20Adjusted%20Unemployment%20Rates_2.jpg" /></p>
|
11 |
+ |
<p><strong>Figure 3.</strong> Comparison of Idaho’s Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment rate to the U.S. Average</p>
|
10 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
11 |
- |
<p>&nbsp;</p>
|
13 |
+ |
<p><img alt="ID's Seasonally Adjusted Unemployment Rate compared to U.S. Average, 1980-2020" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="e33f479b-c2f3-4bca-b1d9-417e4c51845d" data-image-style="export_full_page" height="231" src="https://wioaplans.ed.gov/sites/default/files/styles/export_full_page/public/inline-images/Fig.%203%20-ID%27s%20Seasonally%20Adjusted%20Unemployment.png?itok=5CCqHa2Q" width="600" /></p>
|
12 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
13 |
- |
<p>Idaho’s economy has been exhibiting strong healthy growth. The year-over-year number of employed workers has increased and the year-over-year number of unemployed workers has decreased each month since the recession ended in July 2009, with a few minor upticks early on in the recovery. The upward trend has continued for more than 90 straight months.</p>
|
15 |
+ |
<p>Prior to COVID-19, Idaho’s economy had been exhibiting strong healthy growth. The year-over-year number of employed workers increased, and the year-over-year number of unemployed workers decreased each month since the recession ended in July 2009, with a few minor upticks early on in the recovery.</p>
|
14 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
15 |
- |
<p>Unemployment characteristics were easily obtained for the five target sectors. Between 2010 and 2019 all major industrial sectors experienced a decline in the number of new claimants filing for unemployment. Construction and manufacturing reported the most significant decreases. Construction reported 6,912 unemployment workers in 2019 compared to 20,991 in 2010. Manufacturing reported 5,206 unemployed workers down from 15,480 in 2010. In spite of the decrease in the number unemployed across all industries, construction and manufacturing continue to have the highest percent of total unemployed, 18.1 percent and 13.6 percent respectively. </p>
|
17 |
+ |
<p>When Idaho’s Governor enacted a Stay-at-Home order at the end of March 2020, Idaho’s initial unemployment claims spiked from a typical level of 1,031 to nearly 33,000 within two weeks. Idaho’s continued claims reached a peak of 71,794 claimants filing in early May of 2020. The industries most affected include accommodation and food service, health care and social assistance, and retail trade, together accounting for more than half of initial claims at the peak. One year later – in March of 2021 – initial claims in those three industries returned to near pre-pandemic levels, each having more than an 80 percent reduction.</p>
|
16 |
|
|
18 |
|
|
17 |
- |
<p>Many of the construction occupations are in two categories – construction and extraction and installation, maintenance and repair – reported 7,338 unemployed in 2019 compared to 22,847 in 2010. Manufacturing occupations are primarily in the production group, which reported 2,980 unemployed workers in 2019 compared to 10,827 in 2010.</p>
|
19 |
+ |
<p>Retail trade and health care account for the top two industries by projected employment in 2030. Since 2010, employment in health care and social assistance has increased 37 percent from 72,800 to 99,800; retail trade was reported at 93,200 in January of 2021, up more than 24 percent from 75,000 in 2010. While retail trade is projected to account for the second-most employment in the state, relative growth is projected to slow down to under 10 percent, less than half the relative growth from 2010 – 2020.</p>
|
18 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
19 |
- |
<p>Health care and social services, the only sector posting steady growth through the recession, experienced a decline in unemployment with a very slight uptick in 2017. Healthcare practitioners and technician and healthcare support, the occupation groups that encompass the majority of health care’s occupations, accounted for only 3.36 percent of the unemployed in 2019.</p>
|
21 |
+ |
<p>Top occupations held by unemployment claimants in December of 2020 include construction and extraction – accounting for 15 percent – building cleaning and maintenance, and transportation and material moving. Compared to December of 2019, the number of claimants in those occupations have increased by more than 10 percent.</p>
|
20 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
21 |
- |
<p>Some characteristics of the unemployed are: 64 percent are male, 16 percent are Hispanic (by ethnicity), 75 percent are white and 65 percent are between the ages of 25 and 54. (Detail data is in Data Appendix Table 17 – UI-Claimant Characteristics).</p>
|
23 |
+ |
<p>Some characteristics of the unemployed are: 62 percent are male, 16 percent are Hispanic (by ethnicity), 53 percent are white and 59 percent are between the ages of 25 and 54. Most of these metrics are close to the demographic figures for the entire civilian labor force (employed and unemployed) with the exception of race. Idaho’s civilian labor force is comprised of 90 percent workers who are white, a significantly higher proportion than the 53 percent of unemployed workers of the same race.</p>
|
22 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
23 |
|
<p><strong>Overall Labor Force Participation</strong></p>
|
25 |
|
<p><strong>Overall Labor Force Participation</strong></p>
|
24 |
|
|
26 |
|
|
25 |
- |
<p>The labor force consists of individuals who are in the workforce employed or looking for work. Idaho’s civilian labor force participation rate—percentage of civilians 16 years and over who are employed or looking or work—in 2018 was 64.2 percent, down from Idaho’s highest participation rate of 70.0 percent in 2005. Idaho’s labor force participation rates have consistently been above the national rates since 2010. In 2005 the state’s participation rate was 70.0 percent compared to the national rate of 66.0 percent. Idaho’s participation rate has been around 64.0 since 2013 except for 2014 when it was 63.1percent. The national rate has hovered around 62.9 during the same period.</p>
|
27 |
+ |
<p>The labor force consists of individuals who are in the workforce employed or looking for work. Idaho’s civilian labor force participation rate—percentage of civilians 16 years and over who are employed or looking or work—in 2019 was 63.2 percent, down from Idaho’s highest participation rate of 70.0 percent in 2005. Idaho’s labor force participation rates have consistently been above the national rates since 2010. In 2005 the state’s participation rate was 70.0 percent compared to the national rate of 66.0 percent. Idaho’s participation rate has been around 64.0 since 2013 except for 2014 when it was 63.1percent. The national rate has hovered around 62.9 during the same period.</p>
|
26 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
27 |
- |
<p>The labor force participation rate varies by age group and gender. The most notable difference between 2005 and 2018 was the decrease in the participation rate of Idahoans 16 to 24 years of age. Interestingly, the oldest age group’s participation rate increased.</p>
|
29 |
+ |
<p>The labor force participation rate varies by age group and gender. In the 1-Year American Community Survey 2019 estimates (2020 data was not released due to COVID-19), ages 25-54 had the highest labor participation rate at 81.3 percent. The next highest was ages 16-24 at 67.4 percent. Men had a participation rate of 68.2 percent and women 58.5 percent. Table 9 shows the labor participation rate by age and gender.</p>
|
28 |
|
|
30 |
|
|
29 |
- |
<p><strong>Table 10: 2018 Labor Force Participation Rates Compared to 2005 Rates (Population in Thousands)</strong></p>
|
31 |
+ |
<p><strong>Table 9: 2019 Labor Force Participation Rates by Age and Gender (Population in Thousands)</strong></p>
|
30 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
31 |
|
<table>
|
33 |
|
<table>
|
32 |
|
<thead>
|
34 |
|
<thead>
|
33 |
|
<tr>
|
35 |
|
<tr>
|
34 |
- |
<th> </th>
|
36 |
+ |
<td>
|
35 |
- |
<th>2018 Civilian Population</th>
|
37 |
+ |
<p> </p>
|
36 |
- |
<th>2018 Civilian Population Labor Force</th>
|
38 |
+ |
</td>
|
37 |
- |
<th>2018 Labor Force Participation Rate</th>
|
39 |
+ |
<td>
|
38 |
- |
<th>2005 Civilian Population</th>
|
40 |
+ |
<p>2019 Civilian Population</p>
|
39 |
- |
<th>2005 Civilian Population Labor Force</th>
|
41 |
+ |
</td>
|
40 |
- |
<th>2005 Labor Force Participation Rate</th>
|
42 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
43 |
+ |
<p>2019 Civilian Population Labor Force</p>
|
|
|
|
44 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
45 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
46 |
+ |
<p>2019 Labor Force Participation Rate</p>
|
|
|
|
47 |
+ |
</td>
|
41 |
|
</tr>
|
48 |
|
</tr>
|
42 |
|
</thead>
|
49 |
|
</thead>
|
43 |
|
<tbody>
|
50 |
|
<tbody>
|
44 |
|
<tr>
|
51 |
|
<tr>
|
45 |
- |
<td>Population 16 and Over</td>
|
52 |
+ |
<td>
|
46 |
- |
<td>1,337</td>
|
53 |
+ |
<p>Population 16 and Over</p>
|
47 |
- |
<td>858</td>
|
54 |
+ |
</td>
|
48 |
- |
<td>64.2%</td>
|
55 |
+ |
<td>
|
49 |
- |
<td>1,073</td>
|
56 |
+ |
<p>1,386</p>
|
50 |
- |
<td>751</td>
|
57 |
+ |
</td>
|
51 |
- |
<td>70.0%</td>
|
58 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
59 |
+ |
<p>877</p>
|
|
|
|
60 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
61 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
62 |
+ |
<p>63.2%</p>
|
|
|
|
63 |
+ |
</td>
|
52 |
|
</tr>
|
64 |
|
</tr>
|
53 |
|
<tr>
|
65 |
|
<tr>
|
54 |
- |
<td>16-24</td>
|
66 |
+ |
<td>
|
55 |
- |
<td>206</td>
|
67 |
+ |
<p>16-24</p>
|
56 |
- |
<td>129</td>
|
68 |
+ |
</td>
|
57 |
- |
<td>62.6%</td>
|
69 |
+ |
<td>
|
58 |
- |
<td>204</td>
|
70 |
+ |
<p>215</p>
|
59 |
- |
<td>140</td>
|
71 |
+ |
</td>
|
60 |
- |
<td>68.6%</td>
|
72 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
73 |
+ |
<p>145</p>
|
|
|
|
74 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
75 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
76 |
+ |
<p>67.4%</p>
|
|
|
|
77 |
+ |
</td>
|
61 |
|
</tr>
|
78 |
|
</tr>
|
62 |
|
<tr>
|
79 |
|
<tr>
|
63 |
- |
<td>25-54</td>
|
80 |
+ |
<td>
|
64 |
- |
<td>643</td>
|
81 |
+ |
<p>25-54</p>
|
65 |
- |
<td>534</td>
|
82 |
+ |
</td>
|
66 |
- |
<td>83.0%</td>
|
83 |
+ |
<td>
|
67 |
- |
<td>577</td>
|
84 |
+ |
<p>664</p>
|
68 |
- |
<td>489</td>
|
85 |
+ |
</td>
|
69 |
- |
<td>84.7%</td>
|
86 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
87 |
+ |
<p>540</p>
|
|
|
|
88 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
89 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
90 |
+ |
<p>81.3%</p>
|
|
|
|
91 |
+ |
</td>
|
70 |
|
</tr>
|
92 |
|
</tr>
|
71 |
|
<tr>
|
93 |
|
<tr>
|
72 |
- |
<td>55-64</td>
|
94 |
+ |
<td>
|
73 |
- |
<td>222</td>
|
95 |
+ |
<p>55-64</p>
|
74 |
- |
<td>151</td>
|
96 |
+ |
</td>
|
75 |
- |
<td>68.0%</td>
|
97 |
+ |
<td>
|
76 |
- |
<td>143</td>
|
98 |
+ |
<p>219</p>
|
77 |
- |
<td>99</td>
|
99 |
+ |
</td>
|
78 |
- |
<td>69.2%</td>
|
100 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
101 |
+ |
<p>141</p>
|
|
|
|
102 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
103 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
104 |
+ |
<p>64.3%</p>
|
|
|
|
105 |
+ |
</td>
|
79 |
|
</tr>
|
106 |
|
</tr>
|
80 |
|
<tr>
|
107 |
|
<tr>
|
81 |
- |
<td>65 and older</td>
|
108 |
+ |
<td>
|
82 |
- |
<td>265</td>
|
109 |
+ |
<p>65 and older</p>
|
83 |
- |
<td>44</td>
|
110 |
+ |
</td>
|
84 |
- |
<td>16.6%</td>
|
111 |
+ |
<td>
|
85 |
- |
<td>148</td>
|
112 |
+ |
<p>288</p>
|
86 |
- |
<td>23</td>
|
113 |
+ |
</td>
|
87 |
- |
<td>16.4%</td>
|
114 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
115 |
+ |
<p>51</p>
|
|
|
|
116 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
117 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
118 |
+ |
<p>17.7%</p>
|
|
|
|
119 |
+ |
</td>
|
88 |
|
</tr>
|
120 |
|
</tr>
|
89 |
|
<tr>
|
121 |
|
<tr>
|
90 |
- |
<td>Population 20 to 64 Years</td>
|
122 |
+ |
<td>
|
91 |
- |
<td>979</td>
|
123 |
+ |
<p>Population 20 to 64 Years</p>
|
92 |
- |
<td>773</td>
|
124 |
+ |
</td>
|
93 |
- |
<td>79.0%</td>
|
125 |
+ |
<td>
|
94 |
- |
<td>826</td>
|
126 |
+ |
<p>1,002</p>
|
95 |
- |
<td>673</td>
|
127 |
+ |
</td>
|
96 |
- |
<td>81.5%</td>
|
128 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
129 |
+ |
<p>778</p>
|
|
|
|
130 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
131 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
132 |
+ |
<p>77.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
133 |
+ |
</td>
|
97 |
|
</tr>
|
134 |
|
</tr>
|
98 |
|
<tr>
|
135 |
|
<tr>
|
99 |
- |
<td>Men</td>
|
136 |
+ |
<td>
|
100 |
- |
<td>493</td>
|
137 |
+ |
<p>Men</p>
|
101 |
- |
<td>428</td>
|
138 |
+ |
</td>
|
102 |
- |
<td>86.8%</td>
|
139 |
+ |
<td>
|
103 |
- |
<td>407</td>
|
140 |
+ |
<p>692</p>
|
104 |
- |
<td>365</td>
|
141 |
+ |
</td>
|
105 |
- |
<td>89.7%</td>
|
142 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
143 |
+ |
<p>472</p>
|
|
|
|
144 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
145 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
146 |
+ |
<p>68.2%</p>
|
|
|
|
147 |
+ |
</td>
|
106 |
|
</tr>
|
148 |
|
</tr>
|
107 |
|
<tr>
|
149 |
|
<tr>
|
108 |
- |
<td>Women</td>
|
150 |
+ |
<td>
|
109 |
- |
<td>486</td>
|
151 |
+ |
<p>Women</p>
|
110 |
- |
<td>345</td>
|
152 |
+ |
</td>
|
111 |
- |
<td>71.0%</td>
|
153 |
+ |
<td>
|
112 |
- |
<td>419</td>
|
154 |
+ |
<p>694</p>
|
113 |
- |
<td>308</td>
|
155 |
+ |
</td>
|
114 |
- |
<td>73.6%</td>
|
156 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
157 |
+ |
<p>406</p>
|
|
|
|
158 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
159 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
160 |
+ |
<p>58.5%</p>
|
|
|
|
161 |
+ |
</td>
|
115 |
|
</tr>
|
162 |
|
</tr>
|
116 |
|
</tbody>
|
163 |
|
</tbody>
|
117 |
|
</table>
|
164 |
|
</table>
|
118 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
119 |
- |
<p><sup>Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey</sup></p>
|
166 |
+ |
<p><sup>Source: Census.gov, American Community Survey</sup></p>
|
120 |
|
|
167 |
|
|
121 |
|
<p><strong>Employment Trends by Population</strong></p>
|
168 |
|
<p><strong>Employment Trends by Population</strong></p>
|
122 |
|
|
169 |
|
|
123 |
- |
<p>The table below provides employment information for Idaho’s labor force by age, race, and gender, taken from the American Community Survey (ACS) five-year estimates for 2014-2018. This information provides insight into whether specific groups may face barriers to employment. Specific trends are discussed following Table 11.</p>
|
170 |
+ |
<p>The table below provides employment information for Idaho’s labor force by age, race, and gender, taken from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) five-year estimates for 2015-2019. This information provides insight into whether specific groups may face barriers to employment. Specific trends are discussed following Table 10.</p>
|
124 |
|
|
171 |
|
|
125 |
- |
<p>The American Community Survey (ACS) five-year data is the only source for detailed information on unemployment rate by age, race and ethnicity. The Census Bureau released the 2014-2018 estimates in December 2019.</p>
|
172 |
+ |
<p>This American Community Survey data is the only source for detailed information on unemployment rate by age, race and ethnicity.</p>
|
126 |
|
|
173 |
|
|
127 |
- |
<p><strong>Table 11: Idaho Labor Force by Age, Race and Gender</strong></p>
|
174 |
+ |
<p><strong>Table 10: Idaho Labor Force by Age, Race and Gender</strong></p>
|
128 |
|
|
175 |
|
|
129 |
|
<table>
|
176 |
|
<table>
|
130 |
|
<tbody>
|
177 |
|
<tbody>
|
131 |
|
<tr>
|
178 |
|
<tr>
|
132 |
- |
<td>Total Population, aged 16 Yrs & Older</td>
|
179 |
+ |
<td>Total Population, aged 16 Yrs. & Older</td>
|
133 |
- |
<td>1,298,537</td>
|
180 |
+ |
<td>1,327,132</td>
|
134 |
- |
<td>810,287</td>
|
181 |
+ |
<td>828,116</td>
|
135 |
- |
<td>768,734</td>
|
182 |
+ |
<td>792,237</td>
|
136 |
- |
<td>38,083</td>
|
183 |
+ |
<td>35,879</td>
|
137 |
- |
<td>4.7%</td>
|
184 |
+ |
<td>4.50%</td>
|
138 |
- |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
139 |
- |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
140 |
- |
<td><em>Civilian Labor Force</em></td>
|
|
|
|
141 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
|
|
|
142 |
- |
<td><em>806,373</em></td>
|
|
|
|
143 |
- |
<td><em>768,701</em></td>
|
|
|
|
144 |
- |
<td><em>37,672</em></td>
|
|
|
|
145 |
- |
<td><em>4.7%</em></td>
|
|
|
|
146 |
|
</tr>
|
185 |
|
</tr>
|
147 |
|
<tr>
|
186 |
|
<tr>
|
148 |
|
<td><strong>Age</strong></td>
|
187 |
|
<td><strong>Age</strong></td>
|
149 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
188 |
+ |
<td>Total Population</td>
|
150 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
189 |
+ |
<td>Civilian Labor Force</td>
|
151 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
190 |
+ |
<td>Employed</td>
|
152 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
191 |
+ |
<td>Unemployed</td>
|
153 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
192 |
+ |
<td>Unemployment Rate</td>
|
154 |
|
</tr>
|
193 |
|
</tr>
|
155 |
|
<tr>
|
194 |
|
<tr>
|
156 |
|
<td>16 to 19 years</td>
|
195 |
|
<td>16 to 19 years</td>
|
157 |
- |
<td>95,886</td>
|
196 |
+ |
<td>96,966</td>
|
158 |
- |
<td>43,724</td>
|
197 |
+ |
<td>45,373</td>
|
159 |
- |
<td>36,820</td>
|
198 |
+ |
<td>38,548</td>
|
160 |
- |
<td>6,777</td>
|
199 |
+ |
<td>6,825</td>
|
161 |
- |
<td>15.5%</td>
|
200 |
+ |
<td>17.70%</td>
|
162 |
|
</tr>
|
201 |
|
</tr>
|
163 |
|
<tr>
|
202 |
|
<tr>
|
164 |
|
<td>20 to 24 years</td>
|
203 |
|
<td>20 to 24 years</td>
|
165 |
- |
<td>113,385</td>
|
204 |
+ |
<td>114,610</td>
|
166 |
- |
<td>88,327</td>
|
205 |
+ |
<td>89,499</td>
|
167 |
- |
<td>80,050</td>
|
206 |
+ |
<td>82,685</td>
|
168 |
- |
<td>7,331</td>
|
207 |
+ |
<td>6,814</td>
|
169 |
- |
<td>8.3%</td>
|
208 |
+ |
<td>8.20%</td>
|
170 |
|
</tr>
|
209 |
|
</tr>
|
171 |
|
<tr>
|
210 |
|
<tr>
|
172 |
|
<td>25 to 29 years</td>
|
211 |
|
<td>25 to 29 years</td>
|
173 |
- |
<td>111,480</td>
|
212 |
+ |
<td>114,370</td>
|
174 |
- |
<td>87,735</td>
|
213 |
+ |
<td>89,932</td>
|
175 |
- |
<td>81,938</td>
|
214 |
+ |
<td>85,322</td>
|
176 |
- |
<td>4,738</td>
|
215 |
+ |
<td>4,610</td>
|
177 |
- |
<td>5.4%</td>
|
216 |
+ |
<td>5.40%</td>
|
178 |
|
</tr>
|
217 |
|
</tr>
|
179 |
|
<tr>
|
218 |
|
<tr>
|
180 |
|
<td>30 to 34 years</td>
|
219 |
|
<td>30 to 34 years</td>
|
181 |
- |
<td>108,726</td>
|
220 |
+ |
<td>110,604</td>
|
182 |
- |
<td>85,459</td>
|
221 |
+ |
<td>86,876</td>
|
183 |
- |
<td>81,871</td>
|
222 |
+ |
<td>84,043</td>
|
184 |
- |
<td>2,906</td>
|
223 |
+ |
<td>2,833</td>
|
185 |
- |
<td>3.4%</td>
|
224 |
+ |
<td>3.40%</td>
|
186 |
|
</tr>
|
225 |
|
</tr>
|
187 |
|
<tr>
|
226 |
|
<tr>
|
188 |
|
<td>35 to 44 years</td>
|
227 |
|
<td>35 to 44 years</td>
|
189 |
- |
<td>209,204</td>
|
228 |
+ |
<td>214,214</td>
|
190 |
- |
<td>171,338</td>
|
229 |
+ |
<td>174,713</td>
|
191 |
- |
<td>164,853</td>
|
230 |
+ |
<td>169,469</td>
|
192 |
- |
<td>5,654</td>
|
231 |
+ |
<td>5,244</td>
|
193 |
- |
<td>3.3%</td>
|
232 |
+ |
<td>3.10%</td>
|
194 |
|
</tr>
|
233 |
|
</tr>
|
195 |
|
<tr>
|
234 |
|
<tr>
|
196 |
|
<td>45 to 54 years</td>
|
235 |
|
<td>45 to 54 years</td>
|
197 |
- |
<td>199,059</td>
|
236 |
+ |
<td>200,024</td>
|
198 |
- |
<td>160,641</td>
|
237 |
+ |
<td>162,304</td>
|
199 |
- |
<td>155,465</td>
|
238 |
+ |
<td>157,956</td>
|
200 |
- |
<td>4,819</td>
|
239 |
+ |
<td>4,348</td>
|
201 |
- |
<td>3.0%</td>
|
240 |
+ |
<td>2.80%</td>
|
202 |
|
</tr>
|
241 |
|
</tr>
|
203 |
|
<tr>
|
242 |
|
<tr>
|
204 |
|
<td>55 to 59 years</td>
|
243 |
|
<td>55 to 59 years</td>
|
205 |
- |
<td>105,507</td>
|
244 |
+ |
<td>107,070</td>
|
206 |
- |
<td>76,809</td>
|
245 |
+ |
<td>77,870</td>
|
207 |
- |
<td>74,488</td>
|
246 |
+ |
<td>75,672</td>
|
208 |
- |
<td>2,304</td>
|
247 |
+ |
<td>2,198</td>
|
209 |
- |
<td>3.0%</td>
|
248 |
+ |
<td>2.90%</td>
|
210 |
|
</tr>
|
249 |
|
</tr>
|
211 |
|
<tr>
|
250 |
|
<tr>
|
212 |
|
<td>60 to 64 years</td>
|
251 |
|
<td>60 to 64 years</td>
|
213 |
- |
<td>101,489</td>
|
252 |
+ |
<td>104,385</td>
|
214 |
- |
<td>55,007</td>
|
253 |
+ |
<td>56,992</td>
|
215 |
- |
<td>53,079</td>
|
254 |
+ |
<td>55,271</td>
|
216 |
- |
<td>1,925</td>
|
255 |
+ |
<td>1,721</td>
|
217 |
- |
<td>3.5%</td>
|
256 |
+ |
<td>3.10%</td>
|
218 |
|
</tr>
|
257 |
|
</tr>
|
219 |
|
<tr>
|
258 |
|
<tr>
|
220 |
|
<td>65 to 74 years</td>
|
259 |
|
<td>65 to 74 years</td>
|
221 |
- |
<td>153,600</td>
|
260 |
+ |
<td>160,197</td>
|
222 |
- |
<td>35,328</td>
|
261 |
+ |
<td>38,057</td>
|
223 |
- |
<td>34,099</td>
|
262 |
+ |
<td>37,048</td>
|
224 |
- |
<td>1,201</td>
|
263 |
+ |
<td>1,009</td>
|
225 |
- |
<td>3.4%</td>
|
264 |
+ |
<td>2.70%</td>
|
226 |
|
</tr>
|
265 |
|
</tr>
|
227 |
|
<tr>
|
266 |
|
<tr>
|
228 |
|
<td>75 years and over</td>
|
267 |
|
<td>75 years and over</td>
|
229 |
- |
<td>100,201</td>
|
268 |
+ |
<td>104,692</td>
|
230 |
- |
<td>6,112</td>
|
269 |
+ |
<td>6,500</td>
|
231 |
- |
<td>5,912</td>
|
270 |
+ |
<td>6,223</td>
|
232 |
- |
<td>214</td>
|
271 |
+ |
<td>277</td>
|
233 |
- |
<td>3.5%</td>
|
272 |
+ |
<td>4.50%</td>
|
234 |
|
</tr>
|
273 |
|
</tr>
|
235 |
|
<tr>
|
274 |
|
<tr>
|
236 |
|
<td><strong>Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin</strong></td>
|
275 |
|
<td><strong>Race and Hispanic or Latino Origin</strong></td>
|
237 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
276 |
+ |
<td>Total Population</td>
|
238 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
277 |
+ |
<td>Civilian Labor Force</td>
|
239 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
278 |
+ |
<td>Employed</td>
|
240 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
279 |
+ |
<td>Unemployed</td>
|
241 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
280 |
+ |
<td>Unemployment Rate</td>
|
242 |
|
</tr>
|
281 |
|
</tr>
|
243 |
|
<tr>
|
282 |
|
<tr>
|
244 |
|
<td>White Alone</td>
|
283 |
|
<td>White Alone</td>
|
245 |
- |
<td>1,186,723</td>
|
284 |
+ |
<td>1,205,357</td>
|
246 |
- |
<td>735,768</td>
|
285 |
+ |
<td>747,756</td>
|
247 |
- |
<td>700,167</td>
|
286 |
+ |
<td>716,611</td>
|
248 |
- |
<td>32,374</td>
|
287 |
+ |
<td>31,145</td>
|
249 |
- |
<td>4.4%</td>
|
288 |
+ |
<td>4.20%</td>
|
250 |
|
</tr>
|
289 |
|
</tr>
|
251 |
|
<tr>
|
290 |
|
<tr>
|
252 |
|
<td>Black Alone</td>
|
291 |
|
<td>Black Alone</td>
|
253 |
- |
<td>8,481</td>
|
292 |
+ |
<td>8,317</td>
|
254 |
- |
<td>5,682</td>
|
293 |
+ |
<td>5,252</td>
|
255 |
- |
<td>4,715</td>
|
294 |
+ |
<td>4,804</td>
|
256 |
- |
<td>636</td>
|
295 |
+ |
<td>448</td>
|
257 |
- |
<td>11.2%</td>
|
296 |
+ |
<td>8.50%</td>
|
258 |
|
</tr>
|
297 |
|
</tr>
|
259 |
|
<tr>
|
298 |
|
<tr>
|
260 |
|
<td>American Indian & Alaska Native Alone</td>
|
299 |
|
<td>American Indian & Alaska Native Alone</td>
|
261 |
- |
<td>17,128</td>
|
300 |
+ |
<td>17,859</td>
|
262 |
- |
<td>9,934</td>
|
301 |
+ |
<td>10,435</td>
|
263 |
- |
<td>8,752</td>
|
302 |
+ |
<td>9,475</td>
|
264 |
- |
<td>1,182</td>
|
303 |
+ |
<td>960</td>
|
265 |
- |
<td>11.9%</td>
|
304 |
+ |
<td>9.20%</td>
|
266 |
|
</tr>
|
305 |
|
</tr>
|
267 |
|
<tr>
|
306 |
|
<tr>
|
268 |
|
<td>Asian Alone</td>
|
307 |
|
<td>Asian Alone</td>
|
269 |
- |
<td>19,382</td>
|
308 |
+ |
<td>20,022</td>
|
270 |
- |
<td>11,862</td>
|
309 |
+ |
<td>12,421</td>
|
271 |
- |
<td>11,377</td>
|
310 |
+ |
<td>12,042</td>
|
272 |
- |
<td>356</td>
|
311 |
+ |
<td>379</td>
|
273 |
- |
<td>3.0%</td>
|
312 |
+ |
<td>3.10%</td>
|
274 |
|
</tr>
|
313 |
|
</tr>
|
275 |
|
<tr>
|
314 |
|
<tr>
|
276 |
|
<td>Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander Alone</td>
|
315 |
|
<td>Native Hawaiian & Other Pacific Islander Alone</td>
|
277 |
- |
<td>2,182</td>
|
316 |
+ |
<td>2,114</td>
|
278 |
- |
<td>1,353</td>
|
317 |
+ |
<td>1,331</td>
|
279 |
- |
<td>1,187</td>
|
318 |
+ |
<td>1,178</td>
|
280 |
- |
<td>88</td>
|
319 |
+ |
<td>153</td>
|
281 |
- |
<td>6.5%</td>
|
320 |
+ |
<td>11.50%</td>
|
282 |
|
</tr>
|
321 |
|
</tr>
|
283 |
|
<tr>
|
322 |
|
<tr>
|
284 |
|
<td>Some Other Race Alone</td>
|
323 |
|
<td>Some Other Race Alone</td>
|
285 |
- |
<td>37,630</td>
|
324 |
+ |
<td>43,399</td>
|
286 |
- |
<td>27,658</td>
|
325 |
+ |
<td>31,271</td>
|
287 |
- |
<td>26,190</td>
|
326 |
+ |
<td>29,979</td>
|
288 |
- |
<td>1,355</td>
|
327 |
+ |
<td>1,292</td>
|
289 |
- |
<td>4.9%</td>
|
328 |
+ |
<td>4.10%</td>
|
290 |
|
</tr>
|
329 |
|
</tr>
|
291 |
|
<tr>
|
330 |
|
<tr>
|
292 |
|
<td>Two or More Races</td>
|
331 |
|
<td>Two or More Races</td>
|
293 |
- |
<td>27,011</td>
|
332 |
+ |
<td>30,064</td>
|
294 |
- |
<td>17,584</td>
|
333 |
+ |
<td>19,650</td>
|
295 |
- |
<td>15,801</td>
|
334 |
+ |
<td>18,148</td>
|
296 |
- |
<td>1,723</td>
|
335 |
+ |
<td>1,502</td>
|
297 |
- |
<td>9.8%</td>
|
336 |
+ |
<td>7.60%</td>
|
298 |
|
</tr>
|
337 |
|
</tr>
|
299 |
|
<tr>
|
338 |
|
<tr>
|
300 |
|
<td>Hispanic or Latino Origin of any race</td>
|
339 |
|
<td>Hispanic or Latino Origin of any race</td>
|
301 |
- |
<td>137,536</td>
|
340 |
+ |
<td>143,364</td>
|
302 |
- |
<td>97,238</td>
|
341 |
+ |
<td>100,856</td>
|
303 |
- |
<td>91,461</td>
|
342 |
+ |
<td>95,712</td>
|
304 |
- |
<td>5,445</td>
|
343 |
+ |
<td>5,144</td>
|
305 |
- |
<td>5.6%</td>
|
344 |
+ |
<td>5.10%</td>
|
306 |
|
</tr>
|
345 |
|
</tr>
|
307 |
|
<tr>
|
346 |
|
<tr>
|
308 |
|
<td>White Alone, not Hispanic or Latino</td>
|
347 |
|
<td>White Alone, not Hispanic or Latino</td>
|
309 |
- |
<td>1,095,852</td>
|
348 |
+ |
<td>1,115,497</td>
|
310 |
- |
<td>672,853</td>
|
349 |
+ |
<td>684,818</td>
|
311 |
- |
<td>641,073</td>
|
350 |
+ |
<td>657,137</td>
|
312 |
- |
<td>28,933</td>
|
351 |
+ |
<td>27,681</td>
|
313 |
- |
<td>4.3%</td>
|
352 |
+ |
<td>4.00%</td>
|
314 |
|
</tr>
|
353 |
|
</tr>
|
315 |
|
<tr>
|
354 |
|
<tr>
|
316 |
|
<td><strong>Gender (Civilian Labor Force)</strong></td>
|
355 |
|
<td><strong>Gender (Civilian Labor Force)</strong></td>
|
317 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
356 |
+ |
<td>Total Population</td>
|
318 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
357 |
+ |
<td>Civilian Labor Force</td>
|
319 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
358 |
+ |
<td>Employed</td>
|
320 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
359 |
+ |
<td>Unemployed</td>
|
321 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
360 |
+ |
<td>Unemployment Rate</td>
|
322 |
|
</tr>
|
361 |
|
</tr>
|
323 |
|
<tr>
|
362 |
|
<tr>
|
324 |
|
<td>Male</td>
|
363 |
|
<td>Male</td>
|
325 |
- |
<td>646,704</td>
|
364 |
+ |
<td>660,777</td>
|
326 |
- |
<td>438,106</td>
|
365 |
+ |
<td>448,460</td>
|
327 |
- |
<td>417,289</td>
|
366 |
+ |
<td>428,611</td>
|
328 |
- |
<td>20,817</td>
|
367 |
+ |
<td>19,849</td>
|
329 |
- |
<td>4.6%</td>
|
368 |
+ |
<td>4.40%</td>
|
330 |
|
</tr>
|
369 |
|
</tr>
|
331 |
|
<tr>
|
370 |
|
<tr>
|
332 |
|
<td>Female</td>
|
371 |
|
<td>Female</td>
|
333 |
- |
<td>651,833</td>
|
372 |
+ |
<td>666,355</td>
|
334 |
- |
<td>368,267</td>
|
373 |
+ |
<td>379,656</td>
|
335 |
- |
<td>351,412</td>
|
374 |
+ |
<td>363,626</td>
|
336 |
- |
<td>16,855</td>
|
375 |
+ |
<td>16,030</td>
|
337 |
- |
<td>4.8%</td>
|
376 |
+ |
<td>0.00%</td>
|
338 |
|
</tr>
|
377 |
|
</tr>
|
339 |
|
</tbody>
|
378 |
|
</tbody>
|
340 |
|
</table>
|
379 |
|
</table>
|
341 |
|
|
380 |
|
|
342 |
- |
<p><sup>Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Population Survey</sup></p>
|
381 |
+ |
<p><sup>Source: Census.gov, American Community Survey</sup></p>
|
343 |
|
|
382 |
|
|
344 |
- |
<p>As Table 11 shows, the largest age cohort for Idaho workers is those 35 to 44 years old. The age group experiencing the highest unemployment rate is teens 16 to 19 years old, while the group with the lowest unemployment rate are 45 to 59 years old. </p>
|
383 |
+ |
<p>As Table 10 shows, the largest age cohort for Idaho workers is those 35 to 44 years old. The age group experiencing the highest unemployment rate is teens 16 to 19 years old, while the group with the lowest unemployment rate are 45 to 54 years old.</p>
|
345 |
|
|
384 |
|
|
346 |
|
<p>It is important to note that the youth listed in this table are those who are part of the workforce and actively looking for work. The state is implementing several strategies designed to increase employment, education and skill attainment opportunities for this youth demographic.</p>
|
385 |
|
<p>It is important to note that the youth listed in this table are those who are part of the workforce and actively looking for work. The state is implementing several strategies designed to increase employment, education and skill attainment opportunities for this youth demographic.</p>
|
347 |
|
|
386 |
|
|
348 |
- |
<p>During the five year period (2014-2018) more than 90 percent of Idaho’s labor force is White alone, and this group has an unemployment rate of 4.4 percent—the second lowest among racial and ethnic groups. The lowest unemployment rate was among Asian alone at 3 percent. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone make up the smallest portion of Idaho’s labor force at 0.2 percent, and have a 6.5 percent unemployment rate. The highest unemployment rate—11.9 percent— was reported for American Indian and Alaska Native alone, who make up 1.2 percent of Idaho’s labor force. The Black alone also experienced double-digit unemployment rates, 11.2 percent.</p>
|
387 |
+ |
<p>During the five-year period (2015-2019) more than 90 percent of Idaho’s labor force is White alone, and this group has an unemployment rate of 4.2 percent—the third lowest among racial and ethnic groups. The lowest unemployment rate was among Asian alone at 3.1 percent. Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone make up the smallest portion of Idaho’s labor force at 0.1 percent and yet have an 11.5 percent unemployment rate – the highest of all racial groups. American Indian and Alaska Native alone as well as Black experienced the next highest unemployment rates, at 9.2 and 8.5 percent, respectively.</p>
|
349 |
|
|
388 |
|
|
350 |
- |
<p>People of Hispanic or Latino origin—a designation which crosses multiple racial groups— represent 12 percent of Idaho’s workforce and had an unemployment rate of 5.6 percent.</p>
|
389 |
+ |
<p>People of Hispanic or Latino origin—a designation which crosses multiple racial groups— represent 12 percent of Idaho’s workforce and had an unemployment rate of 5.1 percent.</p>
|
351 |
|
|
390 |
|
|
352 |
- |
<p>Men in the workforce were unemployed at a rate of 4.6 percent compared to 4.8 percent for women. </p>
|
391 |
+ |
<p>Men in the workforce were unemployed at a rate of 4.4 percent compared to 4.2 percent for women.</p>
|
353 |
|
|
392 |
|
|
354 |
- |
<p>Veterans, another important demographic group in Idaho, totaled 115,045 according to the American Community Survey 2014-2018 data. Over 95 percent of Idaho's veterans are White and males account for 92 percent while 42 percent are between the ages of 35 and 64. This group is well educated with 41 percent having some college or an associate degree and 26 percent with a bachelor’s degree or higher. The unemployment rate for veterans was 4.5 percent, just above the state’s average rate. Additional information is found in Data Appendix Table 19 - Idaho’s Veterans.</p>
|
393 |
+ |
<p>Military veterans, another important demographic group in Idaho, totaled 116,157 according to the American Community Survey 2015-2019 data. Nearly 95 percent of Idaho's veterans are White, and males account for 92 percent while 36 percent are between the ages of 35 and 64. This group is well educated with nearly 30 percent having a bachelor’s degree or higher. The unemployment rate for veterans was 4.4 percent, more than 50 percent higher than the state’s average unemployment rate in 2019.</p>
|
355 |
|
|
394 |
|
|
356 |
- |
<p>Idaho is home to five Indian reservations - the Coeur d’Alene and the Kootenai (both in northern Idaho), the Nez Perce (north central Idaho), the Shoshone-Paiute (Duck Valley on the Idaho-Nevada border) and the Shoshone-Bannock (Fort Hall in southeastern Idaho). Total statewide reservation population is 33,887 and includes a variety of races outside of Native American. The largest race is White at 22,973, or 68 percent of the total reservation population. The American Indian and Alaska Native population is second with 9,320, or 28 percent. Most of the workers are in management, business, science and arts occupations. Education services, health care and social assistance provide the largest number of jobs at 2,840. Arts, entertainment and recreation, and accommodations and food services has the second largest number of jobs with over 1,500. Four other industry groups—agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting and mining; manufacturing; retail trade; and public administration (government) employ more than 1,000 workers. One-third of the reservations’ population 25 years and over has a high school diploma or equivalency. Over 53 percent have some college or more. Data Appendix Tables 18a and 18b - Idaho Indian Reservations detail further information specific to reservations.</p>
|
395 |
+ |
<p>Idaho is home to five Indian reservations - the Coeur d’Alene and the Kootenai (both in northern Idaho), the Nez Perce (north central Idaho), the Shoshone-Paiute (Duck Valley on the Idaho-Nevada border) and the Shoshone-Bannock (Fort Hall in southeastern Idaho). Total reservation population for Idaho is 33,377 and includes a variety of races outside of Native American. The largest race is White at 21,950, or 66 percent of the total reservation population. The American Indian and Alaska Native population is second with 8,933, or 27 percent. Most of the workers are in management, business, science and arts occupations. Education services, health care and social assistance provide the largest number of jobs at 2,758. Arts, entertainment and recreation, and accommodations and food services have the second largest number of jobs with over 1,661. Four other industry groups—agriculture, forestry, fishing, hunting and mining; manufacturing; retail trade; and public administration (government) employ more than 1,000 workers. One-third of the reservations’ population 25 years and over has a high school diploma or equivalency. Over 68 percent have some college or more.</p>
|
|
|
|
396 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
397 |
+ |
<p><strong>Employment by Poverty Status</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
398 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
399 |
+ |
<p>In 2021, the federal poverty guideline is $12,880 for a 1-person household and increases by $4,540 for each additional household member. In Idaho, the 5-year ACS estimates reveal that 141,903 — or 10.4 percent of Idahoans —were living in poverty. Of those individuals, 56 percent were female. Slightly less than half (45 percent) of persons living below the poverty threshold were in the labor force — 89 percent of whom were actively employed and the remaining 11 percent unemployed but looking for work. The remaining 55 percent of persons in poverty were not in the labor force. This contrasts with the 90 percent of Idahoans with income at or above poverty level. For those above the poverty level, more than 65 percent of persons were considered in the labor force, with 97 percent of those actively employed. The unemployment rate of persons living below the poverty threshold was more than 4 times higher than those not living in poverty. Table 12 outlines the labor force participation of persons by poverty status.</p>
|
|
|
|
400 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
401 |
+ |
<p><strong>Table 11: Labor Force by Poverty Status</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
402 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
403 |
+ |
<table>
|
|
|
|
404 |
+ |
<thead>
|
|
|
|
405 |
+ |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
406 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
407 |
+ |
<p> </p>
|
|
|
|
408 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
409 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
410 |
+ |
<p>Total</p>
|
|
|
|
411 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
412 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
413 |
+ |
<p>Percent</p>
|
|
|
|
414 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
415 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
416 |
+ |
<p>Labor Force Participation Rate</p>
|
|
|
|
417 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
418 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
419 |
+ |
<p>Employed</p>
|
|
|
|
420 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
421 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
422 |
+ |
<p>Unemployed</p>
|
|
|
|
423 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
424 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
425 |
+ |
<p>Unemployment Rate</p>
|
|
|
|
426 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
427 |
+ |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
428 |
+ |
</thead>
|
|
|
|
429 |
+ |
<tbody>
|
|
|
|
430 |
+ |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
431 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
432 |
+ |
<p>Below Poverty Level</p>
|
|
|
|
433 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
434 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
435 |
+ |
<p>141,903</p>
|
|
|
|
436 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
437 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
438 |
+ |
<p>10.4%</p>
|
|
|
|
439 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
440 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
441 |
+ |
<p>45.9%</p>
|
|
|
|
442 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
443 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
444 |
+ |
<p>57,967</p>
|
|
|
|
445 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
446 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
447 |
+ |
<p>7,099</p>
|
|
|
|
448 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
449 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
450 |
+ |
<p>10.9%</p>
|
|
|
|
451 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
452 |
+ |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
453 |
+ |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
454 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
455 |
+ |
<p>Above Poverty Level</p>
|
|
|
|
456 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
457 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
458 |
+ |
<p>1,214,936</p>
|
|
|
|
459 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
460 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
461 |
+ |
<p>89.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
462 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
463 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
464 |
+ |
<p>66.5%</p>
|
|
|
|
465 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
466 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
467 |
+ |
<p>787,133</p>
|
|
|
|
468 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
469 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
470 |
+ |
<p>21,331</p>
|
|
|
|
471 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
472 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
473 |
+ |
<p>2.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
474 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
475 |
+ |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
476 |
+ |
</tbody>
|
|
|
|
477 |
+ |
</table>
|
|
|
|
478 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
479 |
+ |
<p><sup>SOURCE: American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates: 2019</sup></p>
|
357 |
|
|
480 |
|
|
358 |
|
<p><strong>Idahoans with Disabilities </strong></p>
|
481 |
|
<p><strong>Idahoans with Disabilities </strong></p>
|
359 |
|
|
482 |
|
|
360 |
- |
<p>The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act calls for enhanced services and opportunities for individuals with disabilities in the workforce system. As a result, this population has been analyzed in greater detail in Idaho’s Combined State Plan. The information below provides a deeper look at Idaho’s population of people with disabilities and the employment trends therein. Data is sourced from the American Community Survey estimates unless otherwise noted.</p>
|
483 |
+ |
<p>The Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act calls for enhanced services and opportunities for individuals with disabilities in the workforce system. The information below provides a deeper look at Idaho’s population of people with disabilities and the employment trends therein. Data is sourced from the American Community Survey estimates unless otherwise noted.</p>
|
361 |
|
|
484 |
|
|
362 |
- |
<p>The number of people with disabilities in Idaho is growing. The American Community Survey one-year estimates of individuals with disabilities in Idaho increased from 204,780 in 2014 to 233,494 in 2018, representing an increase of 14 percent over four years. This indicates Idaho’s population of people with disabilities is increasing at a rate faster than growth in the general population.</p>
|
485 |
+ |
<p>The number of people with disabilities in Idaho is growing. The American Community Survey one-year estimates of individuals with disabilities in Idaho increased from 204,780 in 2014 to 241,391 in 2019, representing an increase of 17 percent over five years, which is a faster rate of increase than the general population growth. An increase in disability awareness may also be contributing to the rise in numbers.</p>
|
363 |
|
|
486 |
|
|
364 |
- |
<p>According to data from the 2018 American Community Survey, 13.5 percent of Idaho civilians living in the community report having a disability, including 11.6 percent of residents of working age (18-64). The prevalence of disability in Idaho roughly corresponds to that of the United States, with estimates all within one-percentage point each of the past eight-years, with the exception of 2015. </p>
|
487 |
+ |
<p>According to data from the 2019 American Community Survey, 12.7 percent of Idaho civilians living in the community report having a disability, including 10.5 percent of residents of working age (18-64). The prevalence of disability in Idaho roughly corresponds to that of the United States, with estimates all within one-percentage point each of the past eight-years, with the exception of 2015.</p>
|
365 |
|
|
488 |
|
|
366 |
|
<p><strong>Table 12: Civilians Living in the Community by Age and Disability Status</strong></p>
|
489 |
|
<p><strong>Table 12: Civilians Living in the Community by Age and Disability Status</strong></p>
|
367 |
|
<thead>
|
490 |
|
<thead>
|
368 |
|
<tr>
|
491 |
|
<tr>
|
369 |
- |
<th>Civilian Population</th>
|
492 |
+ |
<td>
|
370 |
- |
<th>Total</th>
|
493 |
+ |
<p>Civilian Population</p>
|
371 |
- |
<th>Population With Disability</th>
|
494 |
+ |
</td>
|
372 |
- |
<th>Percent</th>
|
495 |
+ |
<td>
|
373 |
- |
<th>Population Without Disability</th>
|
496 |
+ |
<p>Total</p>
|
374 |
- |
<th>Percent</th>
|
497 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
498 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
499 |
+ |
<p>Population With Disability</p>
|
|
|
|
500 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
501 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
502 |
+ |
<p>Percent</p>
|
|
|
|
503 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
504 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
505 |
+ |
<p>Population Without Disability</p>
|
|
|
|
506 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
507 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
508 |
+ |
<p>Percent</p>
|
|
|
|
509 |
+ |
</td>
|
375 |
|
</tr>
|
510 |
|
</tr>
|
376 |
|
</thead>
|
511 |
|
</thead>
|
377 |
|
<tbody>
|
512 |
|
<tbody>
|
378 |
|
<tr>
|
513 |
|
<tr>
|
379 |
- |
<td>US Population</td>
|
514 |
+ |
<td>
|
380 |
- |
<td>322,249,485</td>
|
515 |
+ |
<p>US Population</p>
|
381 |
- |
<td>40,637,764</td>
|
516 |
+ |
</td>
|
382 |
- |
<td>12.6%</td>
|
517 |
+ |
<td>
|
383 |
- |
<td>281,611,721</td>
|
518 |
+ |
<p>323,120,678</p>
|
384 |
- |
<td>87.4%</td>
|
519 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
520 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
521 |
+ |
<p>41,089,958</p>
|
|
|
|
522 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
523 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
524 |
+ |
<p>12.7%</p>
|
|
|
|
525 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
526 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
527 |
+ |
<p>282,030,720</p>
|
|
|
|
528 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
529 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
530 |
+ |
<p>87.3%</p>
|
|
|
|
531 |
+ |
</td>
|
385 |
|
</tr>
|
532 |
|
</tr>
|
386 |
|
<tr>
|
533 |
|
<tr>
|
387 |
- |
<td>Idaho Population</td>
|
534 |
+ |
<td>
|
388 |
- |
<td>1,733,484</td>
|
535 |
+ |
<p>Idaho Population</p>
|
389 |
- |
<td>233,494</td>
|
536 |
+ |
</td>
|
390 |
- |
<td>13.5%</td>
|
537 |
+ |
<td>
|
391 |
- |
<td>1,499,990</td>
|
538 |
+ |
<p>1,764,911</p>
|
392 |
- |
<td>86.5%</td>
|
539 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
540 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
541 |
+ |
<p>241,391</p>
|
|
|
|
542 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
543 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
544 |
+ |
<p>13.7%</p>
|
|
|
|
545 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
546 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
547 |
+ |
<p>1,523,520</p>
|
|
|
|
548 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
549 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
550 |
+ |
<p>86.3%</p>
|
|
|
|
551 |
+ |
</td>
|
393 |
|
</tr>
|
552 |
|
</tr>
|
394 |
|
<tr>
|
553 |
|
<tr>
|
395 |
- |
<td>Under 5 Years</td>
|
554 |
+ |
<td>
|
396 |
- |
<td>113,693</td>
|
555 |
+ |
<p>Under 5 Years</p>
|
397 |
- |
<td>1,171</td>
|
556 |
+ |
</td>
|
398 |
- |
<td>1.0%</td>
|
557 |
+ |
<td>
|
399 |
- |
<td>112,522</td>
|
558 |
+ |
<p>115,837</p>
|
400 |
- |
<td>99.0%</td>
|
559 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
560 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
561 |
+ |
<p>1,063</p>
|
|
|
|
562 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
563 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
564 |
+ |
<p>0.9%</p>
|
|
|
|
565 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
566 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
567 |
+ |
<p>114,774</p>
|
|
|
|
568 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
569 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
570 |
+ |
<p>99.1%</p>
|
|
|
|
571 |
+ |
</td>
|
401 |
|
</tr>
|
572 |
|
</tr>
|
402 |
|
<tr>
|
573 |
|
<tr>
|
403 |
- |
<td>5 to 17 Years</td>
|
574 |
+ |
<td>
|
404 |
- |
<td>330,828</td>
|
575 |
+ |
<p>5 to 17 Years</p>
|
405 |
- |
<td>17,799</td>
|
576 |
+ |
</td>
|
406 |
- |
<td>5.4%</td>
|
577 |
+ |
<td>
|
407 |
- |
<td>313,029</td>
|
578 |
+ |
<p>332,592</p>
|
408 |
- |
<td>94.6%</td>
|
579 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
580 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
581 |
+ |
<p>20,065</p>
|
|
|
|
582 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
583 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
584 |
+ |
<p>6.0%</p>
|
|
|
|
585 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
586 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
587 |
+ |
<p>312,527</p>
|
|
|
|
588 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
589 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
590 |
+ |
<p>94.0%</p>
|
|
|
|
591 |
+ |
</td>
|
409 |
|
</tr>
|
592 |
|
</tr>
|
410 |
|
<tr>
|
593 |
|
<tr>
|
411 |
- |
<td>18 to 34 Years</td>
|
594 |
+ |
<td>
|
412 |
- |
<td>385,145</td>
|
595 |
+ |
<p>18 to 34 Years</p>
|
413 |
- |
<td>33,109</td>
|
596 |
+ |
</td>
|
414 |
- |
<td>8.6%</td>
|
597 |
+ |
<td>
|
415 |
- |
<td>352,036</td>
|
598 |
+ |
<p>393,026</p>
|
416 |
- |
<td>91.4%</td>
|
599 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
600 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
601 |
+ |
<p>35,011</p>
|
|
|
|
602 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
603 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
604 |
+ |
<p>8.9%</p>
|
|
|
|
605 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
606 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
607 |
+ |
<p>358,015</p>
|
|
|
|
608 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
609 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
610 |
+ |
<p>91.1%</p>
|
|
|
|
611 |
+ |
</td>
|
417 |
|
</tr>
|
612 |
|
</tr>
|
418 |
|
<tr>
|
613 |
|
<tr>
|
419 |
- |
<td>35 to 64 Years</td>
|
614 |
+ |
<td>
|
420 |
- |
<td>629,208</td>
|
615 |
+ |
<p>35 to 64 Years</p>
|
421 |
- |
<td>84,452</td>
|
616 |
+ |
</td>
|
422 |
- |
<td>13.4%</td>
|
617 |
+ |
<td>
|
423 |
- |
<td>544,756</td>
|
618 |
+ |
<p>639,586</p>
|
424 |
- |
<td>86.6%</td>
|
619 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
620 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
621 |
+ |
<p>86,897</p>
|
|
|
|
622 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
623 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
624 |
+ |
<p>13.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
625 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
626 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
627 |
+ |
<p>552,689</p>
|
|
|
|
628 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
629 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
630 |
+ |
<p>86.4%</p>
|
|
|
|
631 |
+ |
</td>
|
425 |
|
</tr>
|
632 |
|
</tr>
|
426 |
|
<tr>
|
633 |
|
<tr>
|
427 |
- |
<td>65 to 74 Years</td>
|
634 |
+ |
<td>
|
428 |
- |
<td>167,252</td>
|
635 |
+ |
<p>65 to 74 Years</p>
|
429 |
- |
<td>42,386</td>
|
636 |
+ |
</td>
|
430 |
- |
<td>25.3%</td>
|
637 |
+ |
<td>
|
431 |
- |
<td>124,866</td>
|
638 |
+ |
<p>172,552</p>
|
432 |
- |
<td>74.7%</td>
|
639 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
640 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
641 |
+ |
<p>42,440</p>
|
|
|
|
642 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
643 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
644 |
+ |
<p>24.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
645 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
646 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
647 |
+ |
<p>130,112</p>
|
|
|
|
648 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
649 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
650 |
+ |
<p>75.4%</p>
|
|
|
|
651 |
+ |
</td>
|
433 |
|
</tr>
|
652 |
|
</tr>
|
434 |
|
<tr>
|
653 |
|
<tr>
|
435 |
- |
<td>75 Years and Over</td>
|
654 |
+ |
<td>
|
436 |
- |
<td>107,358</td>
|
655 |
+ |
<p>75 Years and Over</p>
|
437 |
- |
<td>54,577</td>
|
656 |
+ |
</td>
|
438 |
- |
<td>50.8%</td>
|
657 |
+ |
<td>
|
439 |
- |
<td>52,781</td>
|
658 |
+ |
<p>111,318</p>
|
440 |
- |
<td>49.2%</td>
|
659 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
660 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
661 |
+ |
<p>55,915</p>
|
|
|
|
662 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
663 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
664 |
+ |
<p>50.2%</p>
|
|
|
|
665 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
666 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
667 |
+ |
<p>55,403</p>
|
|
|
|
668 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
669 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
670 |
+ |
<p>49.8%</p>
|
|
|
|
671 |
+ |
</td>
|
441 |
|
</tr>
|
672 |
|
</tr>
|
442 |
|
</tbody>
|
673 |
|
</tbody>
|
443 |
|
</table>
|
674 |
|
</table>
|
444 |
|
|
675 |
|
|
445 |
- |
<p><sup>SOURCE: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates: 2018 (Table B18101)</sup></p>
|
676 |
+ |
<p><sup>SOURCE: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates: 2019</sup></p>
|
446 |
|
|
677 |
|
|
447 |
- |
<p>The table above demonstrates that the percentage of Idahoans who experience disability varies significantly by age. While this variance can be attributed to a number of factors, in general this rate increases over time with substantial increases both early in life as congenital disabilities are initially identified, and later in life as disabilities are acquired through events or emerge due to the natural aging process. This trend is illustrated in Table 12 above, with only 5.4 percent of individuals aged 5 to17 experiencing disability compared to 13.4 percent for those aged 35 to 64 and 35.3 percent for those aged 65 or older. Because the 35 to 64 age group is quite large, the variance within that group is large as well: around half as many individuals age 18 to 34 experienced a disability</p>
|
678 |
+ |
<p>The table above demonstrates that the percentage of Idahoans who experience disability varies significantly by age. While this variance can be attributed to a number of factors, in general this rate increases over time with substantial increases both early in life as congenital disabilities are initially identified, and later in life as disabilities are acquired through events or emerge due to the natural aging process. This trend is illustrated in Table 12 above, with only 6.0 percent of individuals aged 5 to17 experiencing disability compared to 13.6 percent for those aged 35 to 64 and 34.6 percent for those aged 65 or older. Because the 35 to 64 age group is quite large, the variance within that group is large as well: around half as many individuals age 18 to 34 experienced a disability.</p>
|
448 |
|
|
679 |
|
|
449 |
|
<p>When conducting its research, the American Community Survey includes questions related to six disability categories. Residents are asked if they have difficulty in any of the following areas:</p>
|
680 |
|
<p>When conducting its research, the American Community Survey includes questions related to six disability categories. Residents are asked if they have difficulty in any of the following areas:</p>
|
450 |
|
<thead>
|
681 |
|
<thead>
|
451 |
|
<tr>
|
682 |
|
<tr>
|
452 |
- |
<th>Disability Category</th>
|
683 |
+ |
<td>
|
453 |
- |
<th>Number of Idahoans Reporting a Disability*</th>
|
684 |
+ |
<p>Disability Category</p>
|
454 |
- |
<th>Percent of Idaho’s Total Population (18-64)</th>
|
685 |
+ |
</td>
|
455 |
- |
<th>Percent with a Disability Reporting a Disability within a Category</th>
|
686 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
687 |
+ |
<p>Number of Idahoans Reporting a Disability</p>
|
|
|
|
688 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
689 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
690 |
+ |
<p>Percent of Idaho’s Total Population (18-64)</p>
|
|
|
|
691 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
692 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
693 |
+ |
<p>Percent with a Disability Reporting a Disability within a Category</p>
|
|
|
|
694 |
+ |
</td>
|
456 |
|
</tr>
|
695 |
|
</tr>
|
457 |
|
</thead>
|
696 |
|
</thead>
|
458 |
|
<tbody>
|
697 |
|
<tbody>
|
459 |
|
<tr>
|
698 |
|
<tr>
|
460 |
- |
<td>Hearing</td>
|
699 |
+ |
<td>
|
461 |
- |
<td>31,407</td>
|
700 |
+ |
<p>Hearing</p>
|
462 |
- |
<td>3.1%</td>
|
701 |
+ |
</td>
|
463 |
- |
<td>26.7%</td>
|
702 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
703 |
+ |
<p>27,334</p>
|
|
|
|
704 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
705 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
706 |
+ |
<p>2.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
707 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
708 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
709 |
+ |
<p>2.4%</p>
|
|
|
|
710 |
+ |
</td>
|
464 |
|
</tr>
|
711 |
|
</tr>
|
465 |
|
<tr>
|
712 |
|
<tr>
|
466 |
- |
<td>Vision</td>
|
713 |
+ |
<td>
|
467 |
- |
<td>23,844</td>
|
714 |
+ |
<p>Vision</p>
|
468 |
- |
<td>2.4%</td>
|
715 |
+ |
</td>
|
469 |
- |
<td>20.3%</td>
|
716 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
717 |
+ |
<p>22,142</p>
|
|
|
|
718 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
719 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
720 |
+ |
<p>2.1%</p>
|
|
|
|
721 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
722 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
723 |
+ |
<p>18.2%</p>
|
|
|
|
724 |
+ |
</td>
|
470 |
|
</tr>
|
725 |
|
</tr>
|
471 |
|
<tr>
|
726 |
|
<tr>
|
472 |
- |
<td>Cognitive</td>
|
727 |
+ |
<td>
|
473 |
- |
<td>56,814</td>
|
728 |
+ |
<p>Cognitive</p>
|
474 |
- |
<td>5.6%</td>
|
729 |
+ |
</td>
|
475 |
- |
<td>48.3%</td>
|
730 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
731 |
+ |
<p>56,065</p>
|
|
|
|
732 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
733 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
734 |
+ |
<p>5.4%</p>
|
|
|
|
735 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
736 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
737 |
+ |
<p>45.9%</p>
|
|
|
|
738 |
+ |
</td>
|
476 |
|
</tr>
|
739 |
|
</tr>
|
477 |
|
<tr>
|
740 |
|
<tr>
|
478 |
- |
<td>Ambulatory</td>
|
741 |
+ |
<td>
|
479 |
- |
<td>49,209</td>
|
742 |
+ |
<p>Ambulatory</p>
|
480 |
- |
<td>4.9%</td>
|
743 |
+ |
</td>
|
481 |
- |
<td>41.9%</td>
|
744 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
745 |
+ |
<p>51,911</p>
|
|
|
|
746 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
747 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
748 |
+ |
<p>5.0%</p>
|
|
|
|
749 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
750 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
751 |
+ |
<p>42.5%</p>
|
|
|
|
752 |
+ |
</td>
|
482 |
|
</tr>
|
753 |
|
</tr>
|
483 |
|
<tr>
|
754 |
|
<tr>
|
484 |
- |
<td>Self-Care</td>
|
755 |
+ |
<td>
|
485 |
- |
<td>19,925</td>
|
756 |
+ |
<p>Self-Care</p>
|
486 |
- |
<td>2.0%</td>
|
757 |
+ |
</td>
|
487 |
- |
<td>16.9%</td>
|
758 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
759 |
+ |
<p>16,493</p>
|
|
|
|
760 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
761 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
762 |
+ |
<p>1.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
763 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
764 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
765 |
+ |
<p>13.5%</p>
|
|
|
|
766 |
+ |
</td>
|
488 |
|
</tr>
|
767 |
|
</tr>
|
489 |
|
<tr>
|
768 |
|
<tr>
|
490 |
- |
<td>Independent Living</td>
|
769 |
+ |
<td>
|
491 |
- |
<td>40,716</td>
|
770 |
+ |
<p>Independent Living</p>
|
492 |
- |
<td>4.0%</td>
|
771 |
+ |
</td>
|
493 |
- |
<td>34.6%</td>
|
772 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
773 |
+ |
<p>38,429</p>
|
|
|
|
774 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
775 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
776 |
+ |
<p>3.7%</p>
|
|
|
|
777 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
778 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
779 |
+ |
<p>31.5%</p>
|
|
|
|
780 |
+ |
</td>
|
494 |
|
</tr>
|
781 |
|
</tr>
|
495 |
|
</tbody>
|
782 |
|
</tbody>
|
496 |
|
<p><sup>SOURCE: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates: 2018 (Table B18120)</sup></p>
|
783 |
|
<p><sup>SOURCE: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates: 2018 (Table B18120)</sup></p>
|
497 |
|
|
784 |
|
|
498 |
- |
<p><strong>Table 14: Civilians Aged 18 to 64, Living in the Community by Disability Type</strong></p>
|
785 |
+ |
<p><strong>Table 14: Employment Status by Disability Type</strong></p>
|
499 |
|
|
786 |
|
|
500 |
|
<table>
|
787 |
|
<table>
|
501 |
|
<thead>
|
788 |
|
<thead>
|
502 |
|
<tr>
|
789 |
|
<tr>
|
503 |
- |
<th>Disability Type</th>
|
790 |
+ |
<td>
|
504 |
- |
<th>Total Population*</th>
|
791 |
+ |
<p>Disability Type</p>
|
505 |
- |
<th>Number Employed</th>
|
792 |
+ |
</td>
|
506 |
- |
<th>Number Unemployed</th>
|
793 |
+ |
<td>
|
507 |
- |
<th>Unemployment Rate for those in Labor Force</th>
|
794 |
+ |
<p>Total Population</p>
|
508 |
- |
<th>Number Not in Labor Force</th>
|
795 |
+ |
</td>
|
509 |
- |
<th>Percent Not in Labor Force</th>
|
796 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
797 |
+ |
<p>Number Employed</p>
|
|
|
|
798 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
799 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
800 |
+ |
<p>Number Unemployed</p>
|
|
|
|
801 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
802 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
803 |
+ |
<p>Unemployment Rate for those in Labor Force</p>
|
|
|
|
804 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
805 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
806 |
+ |
<p>Number Not in Labor Force</p>
|
|
|
|
807 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
808 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
809 |
+ |
<p>Percent Not in Labor Force</p>
|
|
|
|
810 |
+ |
</td>
|
510 |
|
</tr>
|
811 |
|
</tr>
|
511 |
|
</thead>
|
812 |
|
</thead>
|
512 |
|
<tbody>
|
813 |
|
<tbody>
|
513 |
|
<tr>
|
814 |
|
<tr>
|
514 |
- |
<td>Cognitive</td>
|
815 |
+ |
<td>
|
515 |
- |
<td>56,814</td>
|
816 |
+ |
<p>Cognitive</p>
|
516 |
- |
<td>16,778</td>
|
817 |
+ |
</td>
|
517 |
- |
<td>3,762</td>
|
818 |
+ |
<td>
|
518 |
- |
<td>18.3%</td>
|
819 |
+ |
<p>56,065</p>
|
519 |
- |
<td>35,409</td>
|
820 |
+ |
</td>
|
520 |
- |
<td>62.3%</td>
|
821 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
822 |
+ |
<p>19,977</p>
|
|
|
|
823 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
824 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
825 |
+ |
<p>2,066</p>
|
|
|
|
826 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
827 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
828 |
+ |
<p>10.3%</p>
|
|
|
|
829 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
830 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
831 |
+ |
<p>34,022</p>
|
|
|
|
832 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
833 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
834 |
+ |
<p>60.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
835 |
+ |
</td>
|
521 |
|
</tr>
|
836 |
|
</tr>
|
522 |
|
<tr>
|
837 |
|
<tr>
|
523 |
- |
<td>Hearing</td>
|
838 |
+ |
<td>
|
524 |
- |
<td>31,407</td>
|
839 |
+ |
<p>Hearing</p>
|
525 |
- |
<td>18,884</td>
|
840 |
+ |
</td>
|
526 |
- |
<td>2454</td>
|
841 |
+ |
<td>
|
527 |
- |
<td>11.5%</td>
|
842 |
+ |
<p>27,334</p>
|
528 |
- |
<td>12,175</td>
|
843 |
+ |
</td>
|
529 |
- |
<td>38.8%</td>
|
844 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
845 |
+ |
<p>16,445</p>
|
|
|
|
846 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
847 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
848 |
+ |
<p>822</p>
|
|
|
|
849 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
850 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
851 |
+ |
<p>4.9%</p>
|
|
|
|
852 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
853 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
854 |
+ |
<p>10,067</p>
|
|
|
|
855 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
856 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
857 |
+ |
<p>36.8%</p>
|
|
|
|
858 |
+ |
</td>
|
530 |
|
</tr>
|
859 |
|
</tr>
|
531 |
|
<tr>
|
860 |
|
<tr>
|
532 |
- |
<td>Self-care</td>
|
861 |
+ |
<td>
|
533 |
- |
<td>19,925</td>
|
862 |
+ |
<p>Self-care</p>
|
534 |
- |
<td>4,543</td>
|
863 |
+ |
</td>
|
535 |
- |
<td>630</td>
|
864 |
+ |
<td>
|
536 |
- |
<td>12.2%</td>
|
865 |
+ |
<p>16,493</p>
|
537 |
- |
<td>14,752</td>
|
866 |
+ |
</td>
|
538 |
- |
<td>74.0%</td>
|
867 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
868 |
+ |
<p>2,783</p>
|
|
|
|
869 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
870 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
871 |
+ |
<p>218</p>
|
|
|
|
872 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
873 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
874 |
+ |
<p>7.8%</p>
|
|
|
|
875 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
876 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
877 |
+ |
<p>13,492</p>
|
|
|
|
878 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
879 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
880 |
+ |
<p>81.8%</p>
|
|
|
|
881 |
+ |
</td>
|
539 |
|
</tr>
|
882 |
|
</tr>
|
540 |
|
<tr>
|
883 |
|
<tr>
|
541 |
- |
<td>Vision</td>
|
884 |
+ |
<td>
|
542 |
- |
<td>23,844</td>
|
885 |
+ |
<p>Vision</p>
|
543 |
- |
<td>11,255</td>
|
886 |
+ |
</td>
|
544 |
- |
<td>1417</td>
|
887 |
+ |
<td>
|
545 |
- |
<td>11.2%</td>
|
888 |
+ |
<p>22,142</p>
|
546 |
- |
<td>11,172</td>
|
889 |
+ |
</td>
|
547 |
- |
<td>46.9%</td>
|
890 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
891 |
+ |
<p>11,302</p>
|
|
|
|
892 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
893 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
894 |
+ |
<p>218</p>
|
|
|
|
895 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
896 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
897 |
+ |
<p>1.9%</p>
|
|
|
|
898 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
899 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
900 |
+ |
<p>10,622</p>
|
|
|
|
901 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
902 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
903 |
+ |
<p>48.0%</p>
|
|
|
|
904 |
+ |
</td>
|
548 |
|
</tr>
|
905 |
|
</tr>
|
549 |
|
<tr>
|
906 |
|
<tr>
|
550 |
- |
<td>Ambulatory</td>
|
907 |
+ |
<td>
|
551 |
- |
<td>49,209</td>
|
908 |
+ |
<p>Ambulatory</p>
|
552 |
- |
<td>14,512</td>
|
909 |
+ |
</td>
|
553 |
- |
<td>2,333</td>
|
910 |
+ |
<td>
|
554 |
- |
<td>13.8%</td>
|
911 |
+ |
<p>51,911</p>
|
555 |
- |
<td>32,364</td>
|
912 |
+ |
</td>
|
556 |
- |
<td>65.8%</td>
|
913 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
914 |
+ |
<p>16,026</p>
|
|
|
|
915 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
916 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
917 |
+ |
<p>1,455</p>
|
|
|
|
918 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
919 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
920 |
+ |
<p>9.1%</p>
|
|
|
|
921 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
922 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
923 |
+ |
<p>34,430</p>
|
|
|
|
924 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
925 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
926 |
+ |
<p>66.3%</p>
|
|
|
|
927 |
+ |
</td>
|
557 |
|
</tr>
|
928 |
|
</tr>
|
558 |
|
<tr>
|
929 |
|
<tr>
|
559 |
- |
<td>Independent living</td>
|
930 |
+ |
<td>
|
560 |
- |
<td>40,716</td>
|
931 |
+ |
<p>Independent living</p>
|
561 |
- |
<td>8,532</td>
|
932 |
+ |
</td>
|
562 |
- |
<td>1,234</td>
|
933 |
+ |
<td>
|
563 |
- |
<td>12.6%</td>
|
934 |
+ |
<p>38,429</p>
|
564 |
- |
<td>30,950</td>
|
935 |
+ |
</td>
|
565 |
- |
<td>76.0%</td>
|
936 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
937 |
+ |
<p>9,189</p>
|
|
|
|
938 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
939 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
940 |
+ |
<p>1,069</p>
|
|
|
|
941 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
942 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
943 |
+ |
<p>11.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
944 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
945 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
946 |
+ |
<p>28,171</p>
|
|
|
|
947 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
948 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
949 |
+ |
<p>73.3%</p>
|
|
|
|
950 |
+ |
</td>
|
566 |
|
</tr>
|
951 |
|
</tr>
|
567 |
|
<tr>
|
952 |
|
<tr>
|
568 |
- |
<td>All Disabilities</td>
|
953 |
+ |
<td>
|
569 |
- |
<td>117,561</td>
|
954 |
+ |
<p>All Disabilities</p>
|
570 |
- |
<td>49,464</td>
|
955 |
+ |
</td>
|
571 |
- |
<td>6,842</td>
|
956 |
+ |
<td>
|
572 |
- |
<td>12.2%</td>
|
957 |
+ |
<p>121,908</p>
|
573 |
- |
<td>61,255</td>
|
958 |
+ |
</td>
|
574 |
- |
<td>52.1%</td>
|
959 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
960 |
+ |
<p>54,417</p>
|
|
|
|
961 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
962 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
963 |
+ |
<p>4,007</p>
|
|
|
|
964 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
965 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
966 |
+ |
<p>7.3%</p>
|
|
|
|
967 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
968 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
969 |
+ |
<p>63,484</p>
|
|
|
|
970 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
971 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
972 |
+ |
<p>52.1%</p>
|
|
|
|
973 |
+ |
</td>
|
575 |
|
</tr>
|
974 |
|
</tr>
|
576 |
|
<tr>
|
975 |
|
<tr>
|
577 |
- |
<td>No disability</td>
|
976 |
+ |
<td>
|
578 |
- |
<td>896,792</td>
|
977 |
+ |
<p>No disability</p>
|
579 |
- |
<td>700,555</td>
|
978 |
+ |
</td>
|
580 |
- |
<td>23,615</td>
|
979 |
+ |
<td>
|
581 |
- |
<td>3.3%</td>
|
980 |
+ |
<p>910,704</p>
|
582 |
- |
<td>172,622</td>
|
981 |
+ |
</td>
|
583 |
- |
<td>19.2%</td>
|
982 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
983 |
+ |
<p>727,649</p>
|
|
|
|
984 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
985 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
986 |
+ |
<p>22,429</p>
|
|
|
|
987 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
988 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
989 |
+ |
<p>3.1%</p>
|
|
|
|
990 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
991 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
992 |
+ |
<p>160,626</p>
|
|
|
|
993 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
994 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
995 |
+ |
<p>17.6%</p>
|
|
|
|
996 |
+ |
</td>
|
584 |
|
</tr>
|
997 |
|
</tr>
|
585 |
|
</tbody>
|
998 |
|
</tbody>
|
586 |
|
</table>
|
999 |
|
</table>
|
587 |
|
|
1000 |
|
|
588 |
- |
<p><sup>SOURCE: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates: 2018 (Table B18120)</sup></p>
|
1001 |
+ |
<p><sup>SOURCE: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates: 2019 </sup></p>
|
589 |
|
|
1002 |
|
|
590 |
- |
<p>Table 14 shows the employment status of Idahoans by self-reported disability type. Variation in employment between disability categories is substantial. For example, those individuals with hearing impairments participate in the labor force at a rate of 53 percent, and of those only 11.2 percent are unemployed. Whereas those with a cognitive disability participate in the labor force at a rate of 36 percent, and 18.3 percent are unemployed. When taken as a group, Idahoans with disabilities participated in the labor force at a rate of 48 percent, compared to 80 percent for people without disabilities, and the unemployment rate for Idahoans with disabilities was 12.2 percent, on average, compared to 3.3 percent for those without disabilities.</p>
|
1003 |
+ |
<p>Table 14 shows the employment status of Idahoans by self-reported disability type. Variation in employment between disability categories is substantial. For example, those individuals with hearing impairments participate in the labor force at a rate of 63 percent, and of those only 4.9 percent are unemployed. Whereas those with a cognitive disability participate in the labor force at a rate of 39 percent, and 10.3 percent of this collection are unemployed. When taken as a total group, Idahoans with disabilities participated in the labor force at a rate of 48 percent, compared to 82 percent for people without disabilities, and the unemployment rate for Idahoans with disabilities was 7.3 percent, on average, compared to 3.1 percent for those without disabilities.</p>
|
591 |
|
|
1004 |
|
|
592 |
- |
<p>Disability is also strongly associated with poverty: 26.36 percent of Idahoans below age 65, fall below the poverty threshold (ACS, 2018 1-year estimates).</p>
|
1005 |
+ |
<p>Disability is also strongly associated with poverty: 24.7 percent of Idahoans below age 65 having a disability fall below the poverty threshold (ACS, 2019 1-year estimates).</p>
|
593 |
|
|
1006 |
|
|
594 |
- |
<p>Finally, it is worth noting that 71 percent of Idaho’s growth can be attributed to people moving to the state. Further analysis of population trends by age across time suggest a significant portion of Idaho’s population growth can be attributed to people age 65 and over moving to the state to enjoy a comparatively cheaper cost of living during retirement. These individuals, due to their age, are more likely to report experiencing a disability, and are less likely to be seeking employment than Idaho’s population on average. This trend is illustrated by a significantly reduced poverty rate for Idahoans with disabilities in retirement age, (13.6 percent for ages 65-74 and 12.1 percent for ages 75 years and over): Those Idahoans with disabilities between 15-65 experience far higher rates of poverty, with all working age cohorts’ poverty rates ranging between 25 and 29 percent. </p>
|
1007 |
+ |
<p>Finally, it is worth noting that a significant percent of Idaho’s growth can be attributed to people moving to the state. Further analysis of population trends by age across time suggest a significant portion of Idaho’s population growth can be attributed to people age 65 and over moving to the state to enjoy a comparatively cheaper cost of living during retirement. These individuals, due to their age, are more likely to report experiencing a disability, and are less likely to be seeking employment than Idaho’s population on average. This trend is illustrated by a significantly reduced poverty rate for Idahoans with disabilities in retirement age, (8.8 percent for ages 65-74 and 8.3 percent for ages 75 years and over). Compared to the 2014 1-Year ACS estimates, both age groups have seen reductions in poverty rate from 13.8 and 9.9 percent, respectively. Those Idahoans with disabilities between 18-65 experience far higher rates of poverty, with all working age cohorts’ poverty rates ranging between 23 and 32 percent.</p>
|
595 |
|
|
1008 |
|
|
596 |
- |
<p><strong>(ii) Labor Market Trends</strong></p>
|
1009 |
+ |
<p><em><strong>(ii) LABOR MARKET TRENDS</strong></em></p>
|
597 |
|
|
1010 |
|
|
598 |
|
<p>This part of Section (II)(a)(1)(B) discusses general trends regarding Idaho’s population and workforce, a discussion of in-migration to our state, as well as trends and changes in Idaho’s population demographics. It also examines wage and income information, and finally, trends relating to Idaho’s job market.</p>
|
1011 |
|
<p>This part of Section (II)(a)(1)(B) discusses general trends regarding Idaho’s population and workforce, a discussion of in-migration to our state, as well as trends and changes in Idaho’s population demographics. It also examines wage and income information, and finally, trends relating to Idaho’s job market.</p>
|
599 |
|
<p><strong>General Population Trends</strong></p>
|
1012 |
|
<p><strong>General Population Trends</strong></p>
|
600 |
|
|
1013 |
|
|
601 |
- |
<p>Idaho’s economy and workforce have historically been, and continue to be, impacted by the state’s geography and population distribution. Idaho is a large, sparsely populated state with a 2018 population of 1.754 million spread across more than 82,000 square miles. Idaho’s average population density is 21.4 persons per square mile, though the population tends to cluster within the six urban counties, Ada, Canyon, Kootenai, Bonneville, Bannock and Twin Falls. The density in these counties is over 94.3 persons per square mile while density in the rest of the state is only 8.5 people per square mile. Ada County has the highest density at 434 persons per square mile. Camas County, one of Idaho’s smaller counties, has the smallest density at 4 persons per 10 square miles. The rural areas, often separated by large distances, mountain ranges and rivers from the nearest urban hubs, pose a challenge for service access and require special consideration in creating any statewide system.</p>
|
1014 |
+ |
<p>Idaho’s economy and workforce have historically been, and continue to be, impacted by the state’s geography and population distribution. Idaho is a large, sparsely populated state with a 2020 census population of 1.839 million spread across more than 82,000 square miles. Idaho’s average population density is 21.9 persons per square mile, though the population tends to cluster within the six urban counties, Ada, Canyon, Kootenai, Bonneville, Bannock and Twin Falls. The density in these counties is over 140 persons per square mile while density in the rest of the state is only 7.9 people per square mile. Ada County has the highest density at 424 persons per square mile. Camas County, one of Idaho’s smaller counties, has the smallest density at 6 persons per 10 square miles. The rural areas, often separated by large distances, mountain ranges and rivers from the nearest urban hubs, pose a challenge for service access and require special consideration in creating any statewide system.</p>
|
602 |
|
|
1015 |
|
|
603 |
- |
<p>The steady shift of Idaho’s population from rural counties to urban counties continued in 2018. From 1920 until 1972, the population in rural Idaho exceeded that of urban counties. However, from the ‘70s on a new demographic era began as people increasingly moved from more rural to less rural areas resulting in increased concentrations in what today are Idaho’s six most populous counties. The population of those six counties account for nearly two-third of the state’s total population while one third is distributed among the other 38 counties.</p>
|
1016 |
+ |
<p>The steady shift of Idaho’s population from rural counties to urban counties continues. From 1920 until 1972, the population in rural Idaho exceeded that of urban counties. However, from the 1970s on a new demographic era began as people increasingly moved from more rural to less rural areas resulting in increased concentrations in what today are Idaho’s six most populous counties. The population of those six counties account for nearly two-thirds of the state’s total population while one third is distributed among the other 38 counties.</p>
|
604 |
|
|
1017 |
|
|
605 |
- |
<p>The six urban counties had a combined population of 1,145,043 in 2018, accounting for 80 percent of the growth in the state’s population and 65 percent of overall population. Idaho’s largest county, Ada, is located in Southwest Idaho. It is the only county with a population over 400,000. </p>
|
1018 |
+ |
<p>The six urban counties had a combined population of 1,198,462 in 2020, accounting for more than 75 percent of the growth in the state’s population since 2019 and 65 percent of overall population. Idaho’s largest county, Ada, is located in Southwest Idaho. It is the only county with a population over 400,000.</p>
|
606 |
|
|
1019 |
|
|
607 |
- |
<p>The Boise Metropolitan Statistical Area (Ada, Boise, Canyon, Gem and Owyhee counties) ranked 8<sup>th</sup> out of 383 in percentage growth.</p>
|
1020 |
+ |
<p>Idaho had four counties with a population of 10,000 or more that ranked nationally in the top 100 counties for percentage growth between years 2010 – 2020. These include Madison (41 percent), Ada (26 percent), Kootenai (23 percent) and Canyon (22 percent).</p>
|
608 |
- |
|
|
|
|
609 |
- |
<p>Idaho had four counties with a population of 10,000 or more that ranked nationally in the top 100 counties for percentage growth in 2018 – Jefferson and Valley (3.3 percent), Canyon (3.1 percent) and Bonner (2.5 percent). </p>
|
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
1021 |
|
|
611 |
|
<p>Idaho’s population and economy are expected to see continued growth. The forces that drove Idaho’s expansion prior to the recession still exist as they did in the 1990s. Population has grown primarily through in-migration of people attracted by Idaho’s quality of life—despite wage and income levels that rank near the bottom of the states. Many of those coming to Idaho are retirees over the age of 65. Increasing population—and an aging population—create more demand for goods and services, which has led to the predominance of the service sector. Our aging population has also increased demand for occupations in the health care industry.</p>
|
1022 |
|
<p>Idaho’s population and economy are expected to see continued growth. The forces that drove Idaho’s expansion prior to the recession still exist as they did in the 1990s. Population has grown primarily through in-migration of people attracted by Idaho’s quality of life—despite wage and income levels that rank near the bottom of the states. Many of those coming to Idaho are retirees over the age of 65. Increasing population—and an aging population—create more demand for goods and services, which has led to the predominance of the service sector. Our aging population has also increased demand for occupations in the health care industry.</p>
|
612 |
|
|
1023 |
|
|
613 |
- |
<p>Idaho’s population has grown 38 percent since the turn of the century. The 2019 population estimate, released in December, showed the continuation of Idaho’s strong growth with a 2.1 percent increase, making it the fastest-growing state. Its growth was much faster than the national growth rate of 0.5 percentage points. That was about seven percentage points below the state’s growth in the 1990s but more than three times the growth rate in the last recession decade of the 1980s. Idaho’s population increased by 36,529 in 2018 to 1,787,065. Idaho ranks 40<sup>th</sup> among the states in overall population, unchanged from 2010.</p>
|
1024 |
+ |
<p>Idaho’s population has grown 44 percent since the turn of the century. The 2020 decennial census, showed the continuation of Idaho’s strong growth with a 2.9 percent increase, making it one of the fastest-growing states in the US. Its growth was much faster than the national growth rate of 1.0 percentage points. It was similar to the state’s peak growth rate in the 2000-2010 decade, occurring in 2006 just before the recession, and more than four times the growth rate in the recession decade of the 1980s. Idaho’s population increased by 52,041 in 2020 to 1,839,106. Idaho ranks 38<sup>th</sup> among the states in overall population, up two compared to the 40<sup>th</sup> most populous ranking in 2010.</p>
|
614 |
|
|
1025 |
|
|
615 |
|
<p><strong>In-Migration </strong></p>
|
1026 |
|
<p><strong>In-Migration </strong></p>
|
616 |
|
|
1027 |
|
|
617 |
- |
<p>Idaho’s net migration during 2019 was 27,527 or 1.5 percent of the population growth while the rest of the population growth was due to the difference between births and deaths. This much growth from immigration sets the state as the fastest recipient of population from the surrounding states and California.</p>
|
1028 |
+ |
<p>Idaho’s net migration during 2020 was 30,961 or 82 percent of the population growth while the rest of the population growth was due to the difference between births and deaths. This much growth through in-migration sets the state as one of the fastest recipients of population growth, primarily from the surrounding states and California.</p>
|
618 |
|
|
1029 |
|
|
619 |
- |
<p>The 2019 county population data will not be available until March 2020. In 2018 more people moved into 35 of Idaho counties than moved out. The increase from net migration ranged from 11,056 in Ada County to just 1 in Bear Lake County. Nine counties—Butte, Lincoln, Fremont, Cassia, Clark Lewis, Gooding, Minidoka and Madison—experienced negative migration – in total, 1,355 more people left than moved in. The 13 counties that make up Idaho’s metropolitan areas accounted for 87 percent of the state’s net migration.</p>
|
1030 |
+ |
<p>In 2020 more people moved into 40 of Idaho counties than moved out. The increase from net migration ranged from 12,519 in Ada County to just 7 in Power County. Four counties—Caribou, Custer, Lemhi, Lewis — experienced negative migration, where 70 more total people left than moved in. The 14 counties that make up Idaho’s metropolitan areas accounted for 87 percent of the state’s net migration.</p>
|
620 |
|
|
1031 |
|
|
621 |
- |
<p>In-migration is expected to increase as Idaho’s economy continues its growth as the state attracts new businesses and local companies expand. With the creation of additional jobs, more local job seekers stay in Idaho, reducing out-migration. At present, there is a shortage of workers and a need for an influx of skilled workforce into the state.</p>
|
1032 |
+ |
<p>As the state attracts new businesses and local companies expand, in-migration is expected to increase as Idaho’s economy continues its growth. With the creation of additional jobs, more local job seekers stay in Idaho, reducing out-migration. At present, there is a shortage of workers and a need for an influx of a skilled workforce into the state.</p>
|
622 |
|
|
1033 |
|
|
623 |
- |
<p>The table below shows in-migration between 2010 and 2019. The recession caused the drop in net migration from 2009 to 2010. Domestic in-migration and out-migration consist of moves where both the origin and destination are within the United States. International migration accounts for any change of residence across the borders of the United States and Puerto Rico. Net international migration is estimated in four parts: foreign born, between the United States and Puerto Rico, of natives to and from the United States and movement of the Armed Forces population between the United States and overseas. The largest component, net international migration of the foreign born, includes lawful permanent residents (immigrants), temporary migrants (such as students), humanitarian migrants (such as refugees) and people illegally present in the United States. After 2011 net migration increased primarily due to the international portion. However, since 2012 net migration increases are largely due to the domestic portion. </p>
|
1034 |
+ |
<p>The table below shows in-migration between 2010 and 2020. The recession caused the drop in net migration from 2009 to 2010. Domestic in-migration and out-migration consist of moves where both the origin and destination are within the United States. International migration accounts for any change of residence across the borders of the United States and Puerto Rico. Net international migration is estimated in four parts:</p>
|
624 |
|
|
1035 |
|
|
625 |
- |
<p><strong>Table 15: Idaho Net Migration, July 2010 through Jun 2019</strong></p>
|
1036 |
+ |
<ul>
|
|
|
|
1037 |
+ |
<li>Foreign born</li>
|
|
|
|
1038 |
+ |
<li>Between the United States and Puerto Rico</li>
|
|
|
|
1039 |
+ |
<li>Natives to and from the United States</li>
|
|
|
|
1040 |
+ |
<li>Movement of the Armed Forces population between the United States and overseas</li>
|
|
|
|
1041 |
+ |
</ul>
|
|
|
|
1042 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
1043 |
+ |
<p>The largest component, net international migration of the foreign born, includes lawful permanent residents (immigrants), temporary migrants (such as students), humanitarian migrants (such as refugees) and people illegally present in the United States. After 2011 net migration increased primarily due to the international portion. However, since 2012 net migration increases are largely due to the domestic portion; international migration has since declined significantly following 2017.</p>
|
|
|
|
1044 |
+ |
|
|
|
|
1045 |
+ |
<p><strong>Table 15: Idaho Net Migration, July 2010 through Jun 2020</strong></p>
|
626 |
|
|
1046 |
|
|
627 |
|
<table>
|
1047 |
|
<table>
|
628 |
|
<thead>
|
1048 |
|
<thead>
|
629 |
|
<tr>
|
1049 |
|
<tr>
|
630 |
- |
<th>Time Period</th>
|
1050 |
+ |
<td>
|
631 |
- |
<th>Net Migration</th>
|
1051 |
+ |
<p>Time Period</p>
|
632 |
- |
<th>Domestic</th>
|
1052 |
+ |
</td>
|
633 |
- |
<th>International</th>
|
1053 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1054 |
+ |
<p>Net Migration</p>
|
|
|
|
1055 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1056 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1057 |
+ |
<p>Domestic</p>
|
|
|
|
1058 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1059 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1060 |
+ |
<p>International</p>
|
|
|
|
1061 |
+ |
</td>
|
634 |
|
</tr>
|
1062 |
|
</tr>
|
635 |
|
</thead>
|
1063 |
|
</thead>
|
636 |
|
<tbody>
|
1064 |
|
<tbody>
|
637 |
|
<tr>
|
1065 |
|
<tr>
|
638 |
- |
<td>July 2010</td>
|
1066 |
+ |
<td>
|
639 |
- |
<td>-264</td>
|
1067 |
+ |
<p>July 2010</p>
|
640 |
- |
<td>-378</td>
|
1068 |
+ |
</td>
|
641 |
- |
<td>114</td>
|
1069 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1070 |
+ |
<p>-194</p>
|
|
|
|
1071 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1072 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1073 |
+ |
<p>-381</p>
|
|
|
|
1074 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1075 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1076 |
+ |
<p>187</p>
|
|
|
|
1077 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1078 |
+ |
</tr>
|
|
|
|
1079 |
+ |
<tr>
|
|
|
|
1080 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1081 |
+ |
<p>July 2011</p>
|
|
|
|
1082 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1083 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1084 |
+ |
<p>2337</p>
|
|
|
|
1085 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1086 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1087 |
+ |
<p>524</p>
|
|
|
|
1088 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1089 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1090 |
+ |
<p>1813</p>
|
|
|
|
1091 |
+ |
</td>
|
642 |
|
</tr>
|
1092 |
|
</tr>
|
643 |
|
<tr>
|
1093 |
|
<tr>
|
644 |
- |
<td>July 2011</td>
|
1094 |
+ |
<td>
|
645 |
- |
<td>2,069</td>
|
1095 |
+ |
<p>July 2012</p>
|
646 |
- |
<td>528</td>
|
1096 |
+ |
</td>
|
647 |
- |
<td>1,541</td>
|
1097 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1098 |
+ |
<p>1035</p>
|
|
|
|
1099 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1100 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1101 |
+ |
<p>-721</p>
|
|
|
|
1102 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1103 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1104 |
+ |
<p>1756</p>
|
|
|
|
1105 |
+ |
</td>
|
648 |
|
</tr>
|
1106 |
|
</tr>
|
649 |
|
<tr>
|
1107 |
|
<tr>
|
650 |
- |
<td>July 2012</td>
|
1108 |
+ |
<td>
|
651 |
- |
<td>806</td>
|
1109 |
+ |
<p>July 2013</p>
|
652 |
- |
<td>-718</td>
|
1110 |
+ |
</td>
|
653 |
- |
<td>1,524</td>
|
1111 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1112 |
+ |
<p>5574</p>
|
|
|
|
1113 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1114 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1115 |
+ |
<p>3535</p>
|
|
|
|
1116 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1117 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1118 |
+ |
<p>2039</p>
|
|
|
|
1119 |
+ |
</td>
|
654 |
|
</tr>
|
1120 |
|
</tr>
|
655 |
|
<tr>
|
1121 |
|
<tr>
|
656 |
- |
<td>July 2013</td>
|
1122 |
+ |
<td>
|
657 |
- |
<td>5,325</td>
|
1123 |
+ |
<p>July 2014</p>
|
658 |
- |
<td>3,543</td>
|
1124 |
+ |
</td>
|
659 |
- |
<td>1,782</td>
|
1125 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1126 |
+ |
<p>10059</p>
|
|
|
|
1127 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1128 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1129 |
+ |
<p>8470</p>
|
|
|
|
1130 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1131 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1132 |
+ |
<p>1589</p>
|
|
|
|
1133 |
+ |
</td>
|
660 |
|
</tr>
|
1134 |
|
</tr>
|
661 |
|
<tr>
|
1135 |
|
<tr>
|
662 |
- |
<td>July 2014</td>
|
1136 |
+ |
<td>
|
663 |
- |
<td>9,804</td>
|
1137 |
+ |
<p>July 2015</p>
|
664 |
- |
<td>8,482</td>
|
1138 |
+ |
</td>
|
665 |
- |
<td>1,322</td>
|
1139 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1140 |
+ |
<p>10065</p>
|
|
|
|
1141 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1142 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1143 |
+ |
<p>6771</p>
|
|
|
|
1144 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1145 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1146 |
+ |
<p>3294</p>
|
|
|
|
1147 |
+ |
</td>
|
666 |
|
</tr>
|
1148 |
|
</tr>
|
667 |
|
<tr>
|
1149 |
|
<tr>
|
668 |
- |
<td>July 2015</td>
|
1150 |
+ |
<td>
|
669 |
- |
<td>9,761</td>
|
1151 |
+ |
<p>July 2016</p>
|
670 |
- |
<td>6,763</td>
|
1152 |
+ |
</td>
|
671 |
- |
<td>2,998</td>
|
1153 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1154 |
+ |
<p>22168</p>
|
|
|
|
1155 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1156 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1157 |
+ |
<p>18550</p>
|
|
|
|
1158 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1159 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1160 |
+ |
<p>3618</p>
|
|
|
|
1161 |
+ |
</td>
|
672 |
|
</tr>
|
1162 |
|
</tr>
|
673 |
|
<tr>
|
1163 |
|
<tr>
|
674 |
- |
<td>July 2016</td>
|
1164 |
+ |
<td>
|
675 |
- |
<td>21,910</td>
|
1165 |
+ |
<p>July 2017</p>
|
676 |
- |
<td>18,541</td>
|
1166 |
+ |
</td>
|
677 |
- |
<td>3,369</td>
|
1167 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1168 |
+ |
<p>26857</p>
|
|
|
|
1169 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1170 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1171 |
+ |
<p>25035</p>
|
|
|
|
1172 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1173 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1174 |
+ |
<p>1822</p>
|
|
|
|
1175 |
+ |
</td>
|
678 |
|
</tr>
|
1176 |
|
</tr>
|
679 |
|
<tr>
|
1177 |
|
<tr>
|
680 |
- |
<td>July 2017</td>
|
1178 |
+ |
<td>
|
681 |
- |
<td>26,525</td>
|
1179 |
+ |
<p>July 2018</p>
|
682 |
- |
<td>25,007</td>
|
1180 |
+ |
</td>
|
683 |
- |
<td>1,518</td>
|
1181 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1182 |
+ |
<p>24864</p>
|
|
|
|
1183 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1184 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1185 |
+ |
<p>24401</p>
|
|
|
|
1186 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1187 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1188 |
+ |
<p>463</p>
|
|
|
|
1189 |
+ |
</td>
|
684 |
|
</tr>
|
1190 |
|
</tr>
|
685 |
|
<tr>
|
1191 |
|
<tr>
|
686 |
- |
<td>July 2018</td>
|
1192 |
+ |
<td>
|
687 |
- |
<td>24,142</td>
|
1193 |
+ |
<p>July 2019</p>
|
688 |
- |
<td>24,020</td>
|
1194 |
+ |
</td>
|
689 |
- |
<td>122</td>
|
1195 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1196 |
+ |
<p>29224</p>
|
|
|
|
1197 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1198 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1199 |
+ |
<p>28466</p>
|
|
|
|
1200 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1201 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1202 |
+ |
<p>758</p>
|
|
|
|
1203 |
+ |
</td>
|
690 |
|
</tr>
|
1204 |
|
</tr>
|
691 |
|
<tr>
|
1205 |
|
<tr>
|
692 |
- |
<td>July 2019</td>
|
1206 |
+ |
<td>
|
693 |
- |
<td>27,527</td>
|
1207 |
+ |
<p>July 2020</p>
|
694 |
- |
<td>27,360</td>
|
1208 |
+ |
</td>
|
695 |
- |
<td>167</td>
|
1209 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1210 |
+ |
<p>30961</p>
|
|
|
|
1211 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1212 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1213 |
+ |
<p>30283</p>
|
|
|
|
1214 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1215 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1216 |
+ |
<p>678</p>
|
|
|
|
1217 |
+ |
</td>
|
696 |
|
</tr>
|
1218 |
|
</tr>
|
697 |
|
</tbody>
|
1219 |
|
</tbody>
|
698 |
|
<p><sup>SOURCE: Annual Population Estimates, U.S. Census Bureau</sup></p>
|
1220 |
|
<p><sup>SOURCE: Annual Population Estimates, U.S. Census Bureau</sup></p>
|
699 |
|
|
1221 |
|
|
700 |
- |
<p>International migration could be the reason that 10.7 percent of the population over the age of 18 speaks a language other than English – with the predominant language being Spanish. Of those who speak a language other than English, nearly 50 percent were foreign-born, 17 percent have incomes below the poverty level and 33 percent have less than a high school education.</p>
|
1222 |
+ |
<p>International migration could be the reason that 10.8 percent of the population over the age of 5 speaks a language other than English – with the predominant language being Spanish. Of those who speak a language other than English, nearly 45 percent were foreign-born, 17 percent have incomes below the poverty level and 30 percent have less than a high school education.</p>
|
701 |
|
|
1223 |
|
|
702 |
|
<p><strong>Demographic Trends</strong></p>
|
1224 |
|
<p><strong>Demographic Trends</strong></p>
|
703 |
|
|
1225 |
|
|
704 |
- |
<p>According to EMSI, Idaho’s population is expected to grow by 13.7 percent from 2016 to 2026 (Table16a). In the same period, Hispanics, the state’s largest minority, will grow much faster at 23.9 percent (Table 16b).</p>
|
1226 |
+ |
<p>According to Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) – a labor market analytics and economics firm – Idaho’s population is expected to grow by 18 percent from 2020 to 2030 (Table16a). In the same period, Hispanics, the state’s largest minority, will grow much faster at 33 percent (Table 16b).</p>
|
705 |
|
|
1227 |
|
|
706 |
- |
<p>Over the next decade however, the major demographic impact in Idaho will come from the aging of the population. Although Idaho has a higher percentage of workers aged 24 and younger than the nation as a whole, the state will not be immune from an aging labor force as workers age 55 and older leave the workplace. This will encourage employers to provide a work environment that entices experienced and highly skilled workers to remain on the job and in the state.</p>
|
1228 |
+ |
<p>Over the next decade however, the major demographic impact in Idaho will come from the aged. Although Idaho has a higher percentage of workers aged 24 and younger than the rest of the country, the state will not be immune from an aging labor force as workers age 55 and older leave the workplace. This will encourage employers to provide a work environment that entices experienced and highly skilled workers to remain on the job and in the state.</p>
|
707 |
|
|
1229 |
|
|
708 |
- |
<p>The overall composition of the population is also changing. Projections indicate that Idahoans aged 55 to 59 years will decrease by 7.7 percent. The age group 10 to 14 will have the smallest growth at only 0.8 percent. The second smallest growth rate will be in the 25 to 29 year olds, 2.9 percent. Over time, this may mean fewer workers aging into the labor force to replace those aging out. While this trend was somewhat evident between 2000 and 2010, it will become much more pronounced as the youngest in the baby boomer generation pass the threshold of 65 in the coming decade. Even with an expanding cadre of older workers, Idaho has a relatively large number of young people entering or soon to enter the labor force.</p>
|
1230 |
+ |
<p>The overall composition of the population is also changing. Projections indicate that Idahoans aged 60 to 64 years will decrease by 1 percent while age groups 65 and older will all increase by 15 percent or more. The age group 55 to 59 will have the smallest growth at only 2 percent. The second and third smallest growth rates will be in the 10 to 14-year-old at 3 percent, and 15 to 19-year-old at 8 percent. Over time, this may mean fewer workers aging into the labor force to replace those aging out. While this trend was somewhat evident between 2000 and 2010, it will become much more pronounced as the youngest in the baby boomer generation pass the threshold of 65 in the present decade. Even with an expanding cadre of older workers, Idaho has a relatively large number of young people entering or soon to enter the labor force.</p>
|
709 |
|
|
1231 |
|
|
710 |
- |
<p><strong>Table 16: Projected Population by Age for Idaho, 2016-2026</strong></p>
|
1232 |
+ |
<p><strong>Table 16: Projected Population by Age for Idaho, 2020-2030</strong></p>
|
711 |
|
|
1233 |
|
|
712 |
|
<table>
|
1234 |
|
<table>
|
713 |
|
<thead>
|
1235 |
|
<thead>
|
714 |
|
<tr>
|
1236 |
|
<tr>
|
715 |
- |
<th> </th>
|
1237 |
+ |
<td>
|
716 |
- |
<th>2016</th>
|
1238 |
+ |
<p> </p>
|
717 |
- |
<th>2026</th>
|
1239 |
+ |
</td>
|
718 |
- |
<th>Percent Change</th>
|
1240 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1241 |
+ |
<p>2020</p>
|
|
|
|
1242 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1243 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1244 |
+ |
<p>2030</p>
|
|
|
|
1245 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1246 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1247 |
+ |
<p>Percent Change</p>
|
|
|
|
1248 |
+ |
</td>
|
719 |
|
</tr>
|
1249 |
|
</tr>
|
720 |
|
</thead>
|
1250 |
|
</thead>
|
721 |
|
<tbody>
|
1251 |
|
<tbody>
|
722 |
|
<tr>
|
1252 |
|
<tr>
|
723 |
- |
<td><strong>Total Population</strong></td>
|
1253 |
+ |
<td>
|
724 |
- |
<td><strong>1,682,935</strong></td>
|
1254 |
+ |
<p><strong>Total Population</strong></p>
|
725 |
- |
<td><strong>1,913,855</strong></td>
|
1255 |
+ |
</td>
|
726 |
- |
<td><strong>13.70%</strong></td>
|
1256 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1257 |
+ |
<p><strong>1,826,913</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
1258 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1259 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1260 |
+ |
<p><strong>2,148,168</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
1261 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1262 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1263 |
+ |
<p><strong>18%</strong></p>
|
|
|
|
1264 |
+ |
</td>
|
727 |
|
</tr>
|
1265 |
|
</tr>
|
728 |
|
<tr>
|
1266 |
|
<tr>
|
729 |
- |
<td>Age</td>
|
1267 |
+ |
<td>
|
730 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
1268 |
+ |
<p>Age</p>
|
731 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
1269 |
+ |
</td>
|
732 |
- |
<td> </td>
|
1270 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1271 |
+ |
<p> </p>
|
|
|
|
1272 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1273 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1274 |
+ |
<p> </p>
|
|
|
|
1275 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1276 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1277 |
+ |
<p> </p>
|
|
|
|
1278 |
+ |
</td>
|
733 |
|
</tr>
|
1279 |
|
</tr>
|
734 |
|
<tr>
|
1280 |
|
<tr>
|
735 |
- |
<td>Under 5 years</td>
|
1281 |
+ |
<td>
|
736 |
- |
<td>114,743</td>
|
1282 |
+ |
<p>Under 5 years</p>
|
737 |
- |
<td>137,005</td>
|
1283 |
+ |
</td>
|
738 |
- |
<td>19.4%</td>
|
1284 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1285 |
+ |
<p>113,848</p>
|
|
|
|
1286 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1287 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1288 |
+ |
<p>137,818</p>
|
|
|
|
1289 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1290 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1291 |
+ |
<p>21%</p>
|
|
|
|
1292 |
+ |
</td>
|
739 |
|
</tr>
|
1293 |
|
</tr>
|
740 |
|
<tr>
|
1294 |
|
<tr>
|
741 |
- |
<td>5 to 9 years</td>
|
1295 |
+ |
<td>
|
742 |
- |
<td>123,004</td>
|
1296 |
+ |
<p>5 to 9 years</p>
|
743 |
- |
<td>130,355</td>
|
1297 |
+ |
</td>
|
744 |
- |
<td>6.0%</td>
|
1298 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1299 |
+ |
<p>125,055</p>
|
|
|
|
1300 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1301 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1302 |
+ |
<p>139,107</p>
|
|
|
|
1303 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1304 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1305 |
+ |
<p>11%</p>
|
|
|
|
1306 |
+ |
</td>
|
745 |
|
</tr>
|
1307 |
|
</tr>
|
746 |
|
<tr>
|
1308 |
|
<tr>
|
747 |
- |
<td>10 to 14 years</td>
|
1309 |
+ |
<td>
|
748 |
- |
<td>125,303</td>
|
1310 |
+ |
<p>10 to 14 years</p>
|
749 |
- |
<td>126,251</td>
|
1311 |
+ |
</td>
|
750 |
- |
<td>0.8%</td>
|
1312 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1313 |
+ |
<p>132,772</p>
|
|
|
|
1314 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1315 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1316 |
+ |
<p>136,595</p>
|
|
|
|
1317 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1318 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1319 |
+ |
<p>3%</p>
|
|
|
|
1320 |
+ |
</td>
|
751 |
|
</tr>
|
1321 |
|
</tr>
|
752 |
|
<tr>
|
1322 |
|
<tr>
|
753 |
- |
<td>15 to 19 years</td>
|
1323 |
+ |
<td>
|
754 |
- |
<td>120,786</td>
|
1324 |
+ |
<p>15 to 19 years</p>
|
755 |
- |
<td>131,912</td>
|
1325 |
+ |
</td>
|
756 |
- |
<td>9.2%</td>
|
1326 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1327 |
+ |
<p>127,139</p>
|
|
|
|
1328 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1329 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1330 |
+ |
<p>137,227</p>
|
|
|
|
1331 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1332 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1333 |
+ |
<p>8%</p>
|
|
|
|
1334 |
+ |
</td>
|
757 |
|
</tr>
|
1335 |
|
</tr>
|
758 |
|
<tr>
|
1336 |
|
<tr>
|
759 |
- |
<td>20 to 24 years</td>
|
1337 |
+ |
<td>
|
760 |
- |
<td>112,423</td>
|
1338 |
+ |
<p>20 to 24 years</p>
|
761 |
- |
<td>124,096</td>
|
1339 |
+ |
</td>
|
762 |
- |
<td>10.4%</td>
|
1340 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1341 |
+ |
<p>119,974</p>
|
|
|
|
1342 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1343 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1344 |
+ |
<p>134,146</p>
|
|
|
|
1345 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1346 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1347 |
+ |
<p>12%</p>
|
|
|
|
1348 |
+ |
</td>
|
763 |
|
</tr>
|
1349 |
|
</tr>
|
764 |
|
<tr>
|
1350 |
|
<tr>
|
765 |
- |
<td>25 to 29 years</td>
|
1351 |
+ |
<td>
|
766 |
- |
<td>112,158</td>
|
1352 |
+ |
<p>25 to 29 years</p>
|
767 |
- |
<td>115,379</td>
|
1353 |
+ |
</td>
|
768 |
- |
<td>2.9%</td>
|
1354 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1355 |
+ |
<p>122,723</p>
|
|
|
|
1356 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1357 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1358 |
+ |
<p>135,302</p>
|
|
|
|
1359 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1360 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1361 |
+ |
<p>10%</p>
|
|
|
|
1362 |
+ |
</td>
|
769 |
|
</tr>
|
1363 |
|
</tr>
|
770 |
|
<tr>
|
1364 |
|
<tr>
|
771 |
- |
<td>30 to 34 years</td>
|
1365 |
+ |
<td>
|
772 |
- |
<td>109,006</td>
|
1366 |
+ |
<p>30 to 34 years</p>
|
773 |
- |
<td>122,637</td>
|
1367 |
+ |
</td>
|
774 |
- |
<td>12.5%</td>
|
1368 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1369 |
+ |
<p>118,855</p>
|
|
|
|
1370 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1371 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1372 |
+ |
<p>137,615</p>
|
|
|
|
1373 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1374 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1375 |
+ |
<p>16%</p>
|
|
|
|
1376 |
+ |
</td>
|
775 |
|
</tr>
|
1377 |
|
</tr>
|
776 |
|
<tr>
|
1378 |
|
<tr>
|
777 |
- |
<td>35 to 39 years</td>
|
1379 |
+ |
<td>
|
778 |
- |
<td>108,863</td>
|
1380 |
+ |
<p>35 to 39 years</p>
|
779 |
- |
<td>122,739</td>
|
1381 |
+ |
</td>
|
780 |
- |
<td>12.7%</td>
|
1382 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1383 |
+ |
<p>120,252</p>
|
|
|
|
1384 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1385 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1386 |
+ |
<p>144,479</p>
|
|
|
|
1387 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1388 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1389 |
+ |
<p>20%</p>
|
|
|
|
1390 |
+ |
</td>
|
781 |
|
</tr>
|
1391 |
|
</tr>
|
782 |
|
<tr>
|
1392 |
|
<tr>
|
783 |
- |
<td>40 to 44 years</td>
|
1393 |
+ |
<td>
|
784 |
- |
<td>98,164</td>
|
1394 |
+ |
<p>40 to 44 years</p>
|
785 |
- |
<td>120,018</td>
|
1395 |
+ |
</td>
|
786 |
- |
<td>22.3%</td>
|
1396 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1397 |
+ |
<p>113,978</p>
|
|
|
|
1398 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1399 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1400 |
+ |
<p>139,533</p>
|
|
|
|
1401 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1402 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1403 |
+ |
<p>22%</p>
|
|
|
|
1404 |
+ |
</td>
|
787 |
|
</tr>
|
1405 |
|
</tr>
|
788 |
|
<tr>
|
1406 |
|
<tr>
|
789 |
- |
<td>45 to 49 years</td>
|
1407 |
+ |
<td>
|
790 |
- |
<td>98,203</td>
|
1408 |
+ |
<p>45 to 49 years</p>
|
791 |
- |
<td>113,755</td>
|
1409 |
+ |
</td>
|
792 |
- |
<td>15.8%</td>
|
1410 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1411 |
+ |
<p>104,222</p>
|
|
|
|
1412 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1413 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1414 |
+ |
<p>134,175</p>
|
|
|
|
1415 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1416 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1417 |
+ |
<p>29%</p>
|
|
|
|
1418 |
+ |
</td>
|
793 |
|
</tr>
|
1419 |
|
</tr>
|
794 |
|
<tr>
|
1420 |
|
<tr>
|
795 |
- |
<td>50 to 54 years</td>
|
1421 |
+ |
<td>
|
796 |
- |
<td>100,505</td>
|
1422 |
+ |
<p>50 to 54 years</p>
|
797 |
- |
<td>104,517</td>
|
1423 |
+ |
</td>
|
798 |
- |
<td>4.0%</td>
|
1424 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1425 |
+ |
<p>101,277</p>
|
|
|
|
1426 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1427 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1428 |
+ |
<p>121,866</p>
|
|
|
|
1429 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1430 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1431 |
+ |
<p>20%</p>
|
|
|
|
1432 |
+ |
</td>
|
799 |
|
</tr>
|
1433 |
|
</tr>
|
800 |
|
<tr>
|
1434 |
|
<tr>
|
801 |
- |
<td>55 to 59 years</td>
|
1435 |
+ |
<td>
|
802 |
- |
<td>106,767</td>
|
1436 |
+ |
<p>55 to 59 years</p>
|
803 |
- |
<td>98,565</td>
|
1437 |
+ |
</td>
|
804 |
- |
<td>-7.7%</td>
|
1438 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1439 |
+ |
<p>109,050</p>
|
|
|
|
1440 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1441 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1442 |
+ |
<p>111,586</p>
|
|
|
|
1443 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1444 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1445 |
+ |
<p>2%</p>
|
|
|
|
1446 |
+ |
</td>
|
805 |
|
</tr>
|
1447 |
|
</tr>
|
806 |
|
<tr>
|
1448 |
|
<tr>
|
807 |
- |
<td>60 to 64 years</td>
|
1449 |
+ |
<td>
|
808 |
- |
<td>100,604</td>
|
1450 |
+ |
<p>60 to 64 years</p>
|
809 |
- |
<td>103,706</td>
|
1451 |
+ |
</td>
|
810 |
- |
<td>3.1%</td>
|
1452 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1453 |
+ |
<p>111,774</p>
|
|
|
|
1454 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1455 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1456 |
+ |
<p>110,442</p>
|
|
|
|
1457 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1458 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1459 |
+ |
<p> (1%)</p>
|
|
|
|
1460 |
+ |
</td>
|
811 |
|
</tr>
|
1461 |
|
</tr>
|
812 |
|
<tr>
|
1462 |
|
<tr>
|
813 |
- |
<td>65 to 69 years</td>
|
1463 |
+ |
<td>
|
814 |
- |
<td>89,658</td>
|
1464 |
+ |
<p>65 to 69 years</p>
|
815 |
- |
<td>109,612</td>
|
1465 |
+ |
</td>
|
816 |
- |
<td>22.3%</td>
|
1466 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1467 |
+ |
<p>102,392</p>
|
|
|
|
1468 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1469 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1470 |
+ |
<p>117,943</p>
|
|
|
|
1471 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1472 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1473 |
+ |
<p>15%</p>
|
|
|
|
1474 |
+ |
</td>
|
817 |
|
</tr>
|
1475 |
|
</tr>
|
818 |
|
<tr>
|
1476 |
|
<tr>
|
819 |
- |
<td>70 to 74 years</td>
|
1477 |
+ |
<td>
|
820 |
- |
<td>63,153</td>
|
1478 |
+ |
<p>70 to 74 years</p>
|
821 |
- |
<td>97,255</td>
|
1479 |
+ |
</td>
|
822 |
- |
<td>54.0%</td>
|
1480 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1481 |
+ |
<p>83,550</p>
|
|
|
|
1482 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1483 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1484 |
+ |
<p>112,655</p>
|
|
|
|
1485 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1486 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1487 |
+ |
<p>35%</p>
|
|
|
|
1488 |
+ |
</td>
|
823 |
|
</tr>
|
1489 |
|
</tr>
|
824 |
|
<tr>
|
1490 |
|
<tr>
|
825 |
- |
<td>75 to 79 years</td>
|
1491 |
+ |
<td>
|
826 |
- |
<td>43,351</td>
|
1492 |
+ |
<p>75 to 79 years</p>
|
827 |
- |
<td>73,316</td>
|
1493 |
+ |
</td>
|
828 |
- |
<td>69.1%</td>
|
1494 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1495 |
+ |
<p>55,797</p>
|
|
|
|
1496 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1497 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1498 |
+ |
<p>90,659</p>
|
|
|
|
1499 |
+ |
</td>
|
|
|
|
1500 |
+ |
<td>
|
|
|
|
1501 |
+ |
<p>62%</p>
|
|
|
|
1502 |
+ |
</td>
|
|